<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 2.0.0.7 &#8211; QuickTime Vulnerability Squashed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-2007-quicktime-vulnerability-squashed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-2007-quicktime-vulnerability-squashed/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:42:57 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-2007-quicktime-vulnerability-squashed/comment-page-1/#comment-115772</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 02:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/18/firefox-2007-quicktime-vulnerability-squashed/#comment-115772</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-115761&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;James wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;And of course this was only for Windows and yet Mac and Linux users got what was basically 2.0.0.6 once again as 2.0.0.7 is 2.0.0.6 but with this fix as 2.0.0.7 does not have any of the branch fixes since 2.0.0.6. The 2.0.0.8 will be more of a actual update.

If Linux/Mac users did not get a 2.0.0.7 update, they would probably wonder why did not and wonder if the software updator was working, and why questions…etc and when 2.0.0.8 came out they would have likely gotten a full size update versus a partial perhaps.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I heard that the vulnerability worked on Macs as well though?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-115761" rel="nofollow">James wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>And of course this was only for Windows and yet Mac and Linux users got what was basically 2.0.0.6 once again as 2.0.0.7 is 2.0.0.6 but with this fix as 2.0.0.7 does not have any of the branch fixes since 2.0.0.6. The 2.0.0.8 will be more of a actual update.</p>
<p>If Linux/Mac users did not get a 2.0.0.7 update, they would probably wonder why did not and wonder if the software updator was working, and why questions…etc and when 2.0.0.8 came out they would have likely gotten a full size update versus a partial perhaps.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I heard that the vulnerability worked on Macs as well though?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-2007-quicktime-vulnerability-squashed/comment-page-1/#comment-115761</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 23:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/18/firefox-2007-quicktime-vulnerability-squashed/#comment-115761</guid>
		<description>And of course this was only for Windows and yet Mac and Linux users got what was basically 2.0.0.6 once again as 2.0.0.7 is 2.0.0.6 but with this fix as 2.0.0.7 does not have any of the branch fixes since 2.0.0.6. The 2.0.0.8 will be more of a actual update.

If Linux/Mac users did not get a 2.0.0.7 update, they would probably wonder why did not and wonder if the software updator was working, and why questions...etc and when 2.0.0.8 came out they would have likely gotten a full size update versus a partial perhaps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And of course this was only for Windows and yet Mac and Linux users got what was basically 2.0.0.6 once again as 2.0.0.7 is 2.0.0.6 but with this fix as 2.0.0.7 does not have any of the branch fixes since 2.0.0.6. The 2.0.0.8 will be more of a actual update.</p>
<p>If Linux/Mac users did not get a 2.0.0.7 update, they would probably wonder why did not and wonder if the software updator was working, and why questions&#8230;etc and when 2.0.0.8 came out they would have likely gotten a full size update versus a partial perhaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox Living Up to Updates - Firefox Facts</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-2007-quicktime-vulnerability-squashed/comment-page-1/#comment-115721</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox Living Up to Updates - Firefox Facts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/18/firefox-2007-quicktime-vulnerability-squashed/#comment-115721</guid>
		<description>[...] For more information about the problem, check out this post on CyberNet News about it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For more information about the problem, check out this post on CyberNet News about it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-2007-quicktime-vulnerability-squashed/comment-page-1/#comment-115685</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/18/firefox-2007-quicktime-vulnerability-squashed/#comment-115685</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-115673&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;And you would use Quicktime why? Shame on the people for even having it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I would have to agree with that, but some people like using it to watch trailers. Personally I always download the video to my computer and watch it in VLC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-115673" rel="nofollow">Google wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>And you would use Quicktime why? Shame on the people for even having it.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I would have to agree with that, but some people like using it to watch trailers. Personally I always download the video to my computer and watch it in VLC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-2007-quicktime-vulnerability-squashed/comment-page-1/#comment-115673</link>
		<dc:creator>Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 19:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/18/firefox-2007-quicktime-vulnerability-squashed/#comment-115673</guid>
		<description>And you would use Quicktime why? Shame on the people for even having it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you would use Quicktime why? Shame on the people for even having it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
