<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Firefox 3 Beta 1 &#8211; It&#8217;s Really Here!</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-beta-1-its-really-here/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-beta-1-its-really-here/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 23:23:45 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Fx Year In Review 2007 Edition &#171; Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-beta-1-its-really-here/#comment-127475</link> <dc:creator>Fx Year In Review 2007 Edition &#171; Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 07:06:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/20/firefox-3-beta-1-its-really-here/#comment-127475</guid> <description>[...] official, Firefox 3 will not be released in 2007. Also because this is a &#8216;Beta&#8217; release CyberNet News warned &#8220;be prepared for poor extension compatibility. Many extensions, especially those [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] official, Firefox 3 will not be released in 2007. Also because this is a &#8216;Beta&#8217; release CyberNet News warned &#8220;be prepared for poor extension compatibility. Many extensions, especially those [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: &#124; Firefox 3 beta goes portable</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-beta-1-its-really-here/#comment-126104</link> <dc:creator>&#124; Firefox 3 beta goes portable</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 13:19:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/20/firefox-3-beta-1-its-really-here/#comment-126104</guid> <description>[...] even count the number of requests I&#8217;ve had to create a Portable Firefox 3 from the latest Beta version that was released. There has been at least a few dozen requests, and I try to do my best explaining how users can [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] even count the number of requests I&#8217;ve had to create a Portable Firefox 3 from the latest Beta version that was released. There has been at least a few dozen requests, and I try to do my best explaining how users can [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-beta-1-its-really-here/#comment-124088</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 03:04:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/20/firefox-3-beta-1-its-really-here/#comment-124088</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-123922&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;netster007x wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;That’s the thing.  Fx3 places was supposed to do all these magical things w/ bookmarks and history.  One of these things, at least as reported here, was bookmark sync.  Instead, they change up the bookmarking system in the background, so the user doesn’t know the difference, but now re-written extensions are necessary for bookmark sync.  I don’t see how that’s better.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Well, their goal all along was to just implement a backend for syncing so that extension developers had a hassle-free way to create the bookmark syncing extensions. It&#039;s really smart because so many of the Firefox users have their own preference as to what bookmarking system they want to use, but I would have liked to see Mozilla team up with Foxmarks to offer a built-in solution.&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-123924&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;netster007x wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Another thing.  I really like that Fx3 star icon on the right of the address bar, so here’s what I did in Opera.  I opened the bookmarks sidebar, right click &gt; customize, dragged the “Add” button just to the right of the address bar.  That was EZ.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; That&#039;s really clever! &lt;em&gt;*Goes to do the same thing*&lt;/em&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-123922" rel="nofollow">netster007x wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>That’s the thing.  Fx3 places was supposed to do all these magical things w/ bookmarks and history.  One of these things, at least as reported here, was bookmark sync.  Instead, they change up the bookmarking system in the background, so the user doesn’t know the difference, but now re-written extensions are necessary for bookmark sync.  I don’t see how that’s better.</p></blockquote></div><p>Well, their goal all along was to just implement a backend for syncing so that extension developers had a hassle-free way to create the bookmark syncing extensions. It&#8217;s really smart because so many of the Firefox users have their own preference as to what bookmarking system they want to use, but I would have liked to see Mozilla team up with Foxmarks to offer a built-in solution.</p><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-123924" rel="nofollow">netster007x wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Another thing.  I really like that Fx3 star icon on the right of the address bar, so here’s what I did in Opera.  I opened the bookmarks sidebar, right click &gt; customize, dragged the “Add” button just to the right of the address bar.  That was EZ.</p></blockquote></div><p>That&#8217;s really clever! <em>*Goes to do the same thing*</em></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: netster007x</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-beta-1-its-really-here/#comment-123924</link> <dc:creator>netster007x</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:51:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/20/firefox-3-beta-1-its-really-here/#comment-123924</guid> <description>Another thing.  I really like that Fx3 star icon on the right of the address bar, so here&#039;s what I did in Opera.  I opened the bookmarks sidebar, right click &gt; customize, dragged the &quot;Add&quot; button just to the right of the address bar.  That was EZ.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thing.  I really like that Fx3 star icon on the right of the address bar, so here&#8217;s what I did in Opera.  I opened the bookmarks sidebar, right click &gt; customize, dragged the &#8220;Add&#8221; button just to the right of the address bar.  That was EZ.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: netster007x</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-beta-1-its-really-here/#comment-123922</link> <dc:creator>netster007x</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:47:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/20/firefox-3-beta-1-its-really-here/#comment-123922</guid> <description>That&#039;s the thing.  Fx3 places was supposed to do all these magical things w/ bookmarks and history.  One of these things, at least as reported here, was bookmark sync.  Instead, they change up the bookmarking system in the background, so the user doesn&#039;t know the difference, but now re-written extensions are necessary for bookmark sync.  I don&#039;t see how that&#039;s better.  How this browser is massively popular I don&#039;t know.That&#039;s really the reason I prefer Opera over Firefox (and I don&#039;t want ext&#039;s in Opera).  I&#039;d rather get handed a giant sack of cool features than have to go find them one by one and cram them all into a small plastic bag as it gets holes and more holes and eventually just tears apart.  Then you get another small plastic bag (create a new profile) and start over again.  It&#039;s the circle of Firefox life.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the thing.  Fx3 places was supposed to do all these magical things w/ bookmarks and history.  One of these things, at least as reported here, was bookmark sync.  Instead, they change up the bookmarking system in the background, so the user doesn&#8217;t know the difference, but now re-written extensions are necessary for bookmark sync.  I don&#8217;t see how that&#8217;s better.  How this browser is massively popular I don&#8217;t know.</p><p>That&#8217;s really the reason I prefer Opera over Firefox (and I don&#8217;t want ext&#8217;s in Opera).  I&#8217;d rather get handed a giant sack of cool features than have to go find them one by one and cram them all into a small plastic bag as it gets holes and more holes and eventually just tears apart.  Then you get another small plastic bag (create a new profile) and start over again.  It&#8217;s the circle of Firefox life.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-beta-1-its-really-here/#comment-123893</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:35:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/20/firefox-3-beta-1-its-really-here/#comment-123893</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-123857&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;netster007x wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;We’ll see if there’s a way to sync w/ bookmark services like delicious by release.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; I&#039;m sure there will be, but not by Mozilla. I think it will come in the form of extensions.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-123857" rel="nofollow">netster007x wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>We’ll see if there’s a way to sync w/ bookmark services like delicious by release.</p></blockquote></div><p>I&#8217;m sure there will be, but not by Mozilla. I think it will come in the form of extensions.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: netster007x</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-beta-1-its-really-here/#comment-123857</link> <dc:creator>netster007x</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:29:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/20/firefox-3-beta-1-its-really-here/#comment-123857</guid> <description>We&#039;ll see if there&#039;s a way to sync w/ bookmark services like delicious by release.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll see if there&#8217;s a way to sync w/ bookmark services like delicious by release.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-beta-1-its-really-here/#comment-123782</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:58:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/20/firefox-3-beta-1-its-really-here/#comment-123782</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-123772&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;netster007x wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I think I found the right zipped Fx3.0b1.  I just put it on that $0.72 1GB flash drive (AWESOME tip).  It’s remarkable how few software enhancements you notice just by using the software.  Really, the biggest thing I noticed was that star button, which is a very small (yet cool) feature.  Then there’s the resizer which I don’t really care about (too much choice, now I’ll be moving it over and over never finding a good spot) and the plugins in AddOns which I’ll admit is pretty darn cool.  Otherwise, forgot all the new features.  I’ll re-read your info then check it out.&lt;a href=&quot;http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/2007-11-07-03-firefox3.0b1/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/moz.....efox3.0b1/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Yep, what you downloaded is essentially the same thing as the Beta. If you really just wanted to test out the features you could use the nightlies, which are equal to the Beta&#039;s plus have some enhancements.&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-123778&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;netster007x wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Overall, Fx doesn’t have many big improvements.  It’s probably not going to get much more this release, also.  Opera in a much shorter development cycle got out a 9.5 beta w/ a big feature: auto bookmark sync w/ no extra install.  I’m guessing Opera still has a few more features coming this release, also.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; This release of Firefox definitely seems to pay more attention to the finer details, instead of having the &quot;big&quot; new features. Although I would have to say that their bookmark system redesign is rather big considering the addition of tags. This will likely mean that bookmarking systems such as Delicious will be able to integrate directly into the browser&#039;s bookmarks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-123772" rel="nofollow">netster007x wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>I think I found the right zipped Fx3.0b1.  I just put it on that $0.72 1GB flash drive (AWESOME tip).  It’s remarkable how few software enhancements you notice just by using the software.  Really, the biggest thing I noticed was that star button, which is a very small (yet cool) feature.  Then there’s the resizer which I don’t really care about (too much choice, now I’ll be moving it over and over never finding a good spot) and the plugins in AddOns which I’ll admit is pretty darn cool.  Otherwise, forgot all the new features.  I’ll re-read your info then check it out.</p><p><a href="[<a href='http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/2007-11-07-03-firefox3.0b1/' rel='nofollow'>ftp.mozilla.org</a>]" rel="nofollow">[<a href='http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/moz&#8230;..efox3.0b1/' rel='nofollow'>ftp.mozilla.org</a>]</p></blockquote></div><p>Yep, what you downloaded is essentially the same thing as the Beta. If you really just wanted to test out the features you could use the nightlies, which are equal to the Beta&#8217;s plus have some enhancements.</p><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-123778" rel="nofollow">netster007x wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Overall, Fx doesn’t have many big improvements.  It’s probably not going to get much more this release, also.  Opera in a much shorter development cycle got out a 9.5 beta w/ a big feature: auto bookmark sync w/ no extra install.  I’m guessing Opera still has a few more features coming this release, also.</p></blockquote></div><p>This release of Firefox definitely seems to pay more attention to the finer details, instead of having the &#8220;big&#8221; new features. Although I would have to say that their bookmark system redesign is rather big considering the addition of tags. This will likely mean that bookmarking systems such as Delicious will be able to integrate directly into the browser&#8217;s bookmarks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: netster007x</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-beta-1-its-really-here/#comment-123778</link> <dc:creator>netster007x</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:39:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/20/firefox-3-beta-1-its-really-here/#comment-123778</guid> <description>Wow, BUG, if you drag the search bar way to the left it horizontally squishes the back/fwd/home... icons (unlike Opera which can make icons scale nicely).  After shrinking the searchbar back, the icons stayed squished.  Had to customize toolbar, and re-add the icons.OK, for features, there&#039;s the real zoom which is good (and overdue).  They should get it in the tray like IE7 &amp; Opera9.5 so people actually notice it.  And, unlike in Opera, you can&#039;t put it in the tray yourself.  Restart Fx is also overdue.  Permissions are kinda cool (also something Opera has had).  I like that there&#039;s all the options on one tab.  It doesn&#039;t seem to fit, though, that it&#039;s a part of Page Info.  Maybe they should make it Page Info/Permissions.  Fx still has I think the worst theme of Opera/IE/FxOverall, Fx doesn&#039;t have many big improvements.  It&#039;s probably not going to get much more this release, also.  Opera in a much shorter development cycle got out a 9.5 beta w/ a big feature: auto bookmark sync w/ no extra install.  I&#039;m guessing Opera still has a few more features coming this release, also.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, BUG, if you drag the search bar way to the left it horizontally squishes the back/fwd/home&#8230; icons (unlike Opera which can make icons scale nicely).  After shrinking the searchbar back, the icons stayed squished.  Had to customize toolbar, and re-add the icons.</p><p>OK, for features, there&#8217;s the real zoom which is good (and overdue).  They should get it in the tray like IE7 &amp; Opera9.5 so people actually notice it.  And, unlike in Opera, you can&#8217;t put it in the tray yourself.  Restart Fx is also overdue.  Permissions are kinda cool (also something Opera has had).  I like that there&#8217;s all the options on one tab.  It doesn&#8217;t seem to fit, though, that it&#8217;s a part of Page Info.  Maybe they should make it Page Info/Permissions.  Fx still has I think the worst theme of Opera/IE/Fx</p><p>Overall, Fx doesn&#8217;t have many big improvements.  It&#8217;s probably not going to get much more this release, also.  Opera in a much shorter development cycle got out a 9.5 beta w/ a big feature: auto bookmark sync w/ no extra install.  I&#8217;m guessing Opera still has a few more features coming this release, also.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: netster007x</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-beta-1-its-really-here/#comment-123772</link> <dc:creator>netster007x</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:24:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/20/firefox-3-beta-1-its-really-here/#comment-123772</guid> <description>I think I found the right zipped Fx3.0b1.  I just put it on that $0.72 1GB flash drive (AWESOME tip).  It&#039;s remarkable how few software enhancements you notice just by using the software.  Really, the biggest thing I noticed was that star button, which is a very small (yet cool) feature.  Then there&#039;s the resizer which I don&#039;t really care about (too much choice, now I&#039;ll be moving it over and over never finding a good spot) and the plugins in AddOns which I&#039;ll admit is pretty darn cool.  Otherwise, forgot all the new features.  I&#039;ll re-read your info then check it out.http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/2007-11-07-03-firefox3.0b1/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I found the right zipped Fx3.0b1.  I just put it on that $0.72 1GB flash drive (AWESOME tip).  It&#8217;s remarkable how few software enhancements you notice just by using the software.  Really, the biggest thing I noticed was that star button, which is a very small (yet cool) feature.  Then there&#8217;s the resizer which I don&#8217;t really care about (too much choice, now I&#8217;ll be moving it over and over never finding a good spot) and the plugins in AddOns which I&#8217;ll admit is pretty darn cool.  Otherwise, forgot all the new features.  I&#8217;ll re-read your info then check it out.</p><p>[<a href='http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/2007-11-07-03-firefox3.0b1/' rel='nofollow'>ftp.mozilla.org</a>]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 298/319 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-26 18:48:31 -->
