<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3 Performance Gets a Boost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-performance-gets-a-boost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-performance-gets-a-boost/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:45:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Espen Pespen</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-performance-gets-a-boost/comment-page-1/#comment-148104</link>
		<dc:creator>Espen Pespen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/25/firefox-3-performance-gets-a-boost/#comment-148104</guid>
		<description>542 ms.

Safari 4.0 on a Mac Pro:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>542 ms.</p>
<p>Safari 4.0 on a Mac Pro:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kpss sonuçlar?</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-performance-gets-a-boost/comment-page-1/#comment-147431</link>
		<dc:creator>kpss sonuçlar?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/25/firefox-3-performance-gets-a-boost/#comment-147431</guid>
		<description>I love FF 3 :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love FF 3 <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ???IE?? &#124; ??</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-performance-gets-a-boost/comment-page-1/#comment-147027</link>
		<dc:creator>???IE?? &#124; ??</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/25/firefox-3-performance-gets-a-boost/#comment-147027</guid>
		<description>[...] CyberNet ??Firefox 3? JavaScript ???SunSpider JavaScript Benchmark??????????? 1. Firefox 3 Nightly (PGO Optimized): 7263.8ms 2. Firefox 3 Nightly (02/25/2008 build): 8219.4ms 3. Opera 9.5.9807 Beta: 10824.0ms 4. Firefox 3 Beta 3: 16080.6ms 5. Safari 3.0.4 Beta: 18012.6ms 6. Firefox 2.0.0.12: 29376.4ms 7. Internet Explorer 7: 72375.0ms [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CyberNet ??Firefox 3? JavaScript ???SunSpider JavaScript Benchmark??????????? 1. Firefox 3 Nightly (PGO Optimized): 7263.8ms 2. Firefox 3 Nightly (02/25/2008 build): 8219.4ms 3. Opera 9.5.9807 Beta: 10824.0ms 4. Firefox 3 Beta 3: 16080.6ms 5. Safari 3.0.4 Beta: 18012.6ms 6. Firefox 2.0.0.12: 29376.4ms 7. Internet Explorer 7: 72375.0ms [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox 3 and gmail &#171; How things &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-performance-gets-a-boost/comment-page-1/#comment-146947</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox 3 and gmail &#171; How things &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/25/firefox-3-performance-gets-a-boost/#comment-146947</guid>
		<description>[...] could load faster, I checked if firefox 3 can actually load gmail faster. And it can! A look at this site will tell you that firefox 3 (pre-release) runs javascript more than 3 times faster than firefox 2. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] could load faster, I checked if firefox 3 can actually load gmail faster. And it can! A look at this site will tell you that firefox 3 (pre-release) runs javascript more than 3 times faster than firefox 2. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ST</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-performance-gets-a-boost/comment-page-1/#comment-145933</link>
		<dc:creator>ST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/25/firefox-3-performance-gets-a-boost/#comment-145933</guid>
		<description>Not everyone can afford to upgrade from win98. 
Lack of work in a sick economy an all. :(
And Linux is not always a good alternative.
I&#039;m hesitant to dual boot, but we&#039;ll see. 
Still, it would be nice to be able to run 
FF3 on win9x. :?

Besides, how can you truly declare it runs faster,
until you run it on one of those old win98 machines.
That&#039;s the real test. :o</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not everyone can afford to upgrade from win98.<br />
Lack of work in a sick economy an all. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
And Linux is not always a good alternative.<br />
I&#8217;m hesitant to dual boot, but we&#8217;ll see.<br />
Still, it would be nice to be able to run<br />
FF3 on win9x. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_confused.gif' alt=':?' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Besides, how can you truly declare it runs faster,<br />
until you run it on one of those old win98 machines.<br />
That&#8217;s the real test. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iphone games</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-performance-gets-a-boost/comment-page-1/#comment-143513</link>
		<dc:creator>iphone games</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 22:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/25/firefox-3-performance-gets-a-boost/#comment-143513</guid>
		<description>Firefox fantastic. thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox fantastic. thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-performance-gets-a-boost/comment-page-1/#comment-143394</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/25/firefox-3-performance-gets-a-boost/#comment-143394</guid>
		<description>Version 3 is junk! I removed it because a lot of my add-ons are not supported with this new version. The browser is slow, the shortcut feature is stupid. Just junk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Version 3 is junk! I removed it because a lot of my add-ons are not supported with this new version. The browser is slow, the shortcut feature is stupid. Just junk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcowboys21</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-performance-gets-a-boost/comment-page-1/#comment-143388</link>
		<dc:creator>dcowboys21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/25/firefox-3-performance-gets-a-boost/#comment-143388</guid>
		<description>cant find where u can download it.how much different is it really.is it worth downloading.also i heard google chrome is really good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cant find where u can download it.how much different is it really.is it worth downloading.also i heard google chrome is really good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sbs</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-performance-gets-a-boost/comment-page-1/#comment-143356</link>
		<dc:creator>sbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/25/firefox-3-performance-gets-a-boost/#comment-143356</guid>
		<description>Firefox 3 number one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox 3 number one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: türkçe öss</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-performance-gets-a-boost/comment-page-1/#comment-143355</link>
		<dc:creator>türkçe öss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/25/firefox-3-performance-gets-a-boost/#comment-143355</guid>
		<description>With that said, I, personally, am waiting anxiously for the performance improvements of Firefox 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With that said, I, personally, am waiting anxiously for the performance improvements of Firefox 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
