<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3 Vulnerability Found in 5-hours</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-vulnerability-found-in-5-hours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-vulnerability-found-in-5-hours/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:18:25 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-vulnerability-found-in-5-hours/comment-page-1/#comment-139652</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13230#comment-139652</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-139591&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Guru wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Firefox 2.0.0.15 has been pushed back to July 1st because of this. A respin was just done on Friday, June 20th.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Interesting that the release got pushed back because of this. You would have thought that this would bring the 2.0.0.15 release even sooner. Heck, even Flock grabbed the patch from Mozilla&#039;s servers, incorporated it into their current version, and already posted the new release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-139591" rel="nofollow">The Guru wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Firefox 2.0.0.15 has been pushed back to July 1st because of this. A respin was just done on Friday, June 20th.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Interesting that the release got pushed back because of this. You would have thought that this would bring the 2.0.0.15 release even sooner. Heck, even Flock grabbed the patch from Mozilla&#8217;s servers, incorporated it into their current version, and already posted the new release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox 3 Vulnerability Found &#171; Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-vulnerability-found-in-5-hours/comment-page-1/#comment-139592</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox 3 Vulnerability Found &#171; Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13230#comment-139592</guid>
		<description>[...] CyberNet News [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CyberNet News [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Guru</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-vulnerability-found-in-5-hours/comment-page-1/#comment-139591</link>
		<dc:creator>The Guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13230#comment-139591</guid>
		<description>Firefox 2.0.0.15 has been pushed back to July 1st because of this. A respin was just done on Friday, June 20th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox 2.0.0.15 has been pushed back to July 1st because of this. A respin was just done on Friday, June 20th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Guru</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-vulnerability-found-in-5-hours/comment-page-1/#comment-139583</link>
		<dc:creator>The Guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13230#comment-139583</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-139565&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ryan wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-139550&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ken wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The final product crashes more than the beta!!!!&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
You might want to try starting with a fresh profile… I haven’t had Firefox 3 crash on me in months.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
You are not trying hard enough.  :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-139565" rel="nofollow">Ryan wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-139550" rel="nofollow">Ken wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>The final product crashes more than the beta!!!!</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>You might want to try starting with a fresh profile… I haven’t had Firefox 3 crash on me in months.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>You are not trying hard enough.  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-vulnerability-found-in-5-hours/comment-page-1/#comment-139565</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13230#comment-139565</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-139530&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;James wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I have a feeling the anonymous tipster behind it waited until the Firefox 3.0 release in order rain on Mozilla’s parade as he may have found it a while ago in RC or Beta earlier as RC2 on Windows/Linux is the same as Final for example as RC3 was mainly for Mac.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I&#039;m sure that&#039;s exactly what happened, which is unfortunate. I guess we just have to be happy that it wasn&#039;t publicly disclosed.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-139550&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ken wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The final product crashes more than the beta!!!!&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
You might want to try starting with a fresh profile... I haven&#039;t had Firefox 3 crash on me in months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-139530" rel="nofollow">James wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I have a feeling the anonymous tipster behind it waited until the Firefox 3.0 release in order rain on Mozilla’s parade as he may have found it a while ago in RC or Beta earlier as RC2 on Windows/Linux is the same as Final for example as RC3 was mainly for Mac.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that&#8217;s exactly what happened, which is unfortunate. I guess we just have to be happy that it wasn&#8217;t publicly disclosed.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-139550" rel="nofollow">Ken wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>The final product crashes more than the beta!!!!</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>You might want to try starting with a fresh profile&#8230; I haven&#8217;t had Firefox 3 crash on me in months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-vulnerability-found-in-5-hours/comment-page-1/#comment-139559</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13230#comment-139559</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-139555&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Andrew wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Well the new FF3 sucks… the whole font rendering system is horrible the fonts constantly changing size and appears all whacked when it shouldn’t, already uninstalled and went back to FF2 since it doesn’t have this problem!&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

huh??

i&#039;m a bit sensitive to font issues myself, but i have no idea what you&#039;re talking about.

so far i&#039;m loving FF3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-139555" rel="nofollow">Andrew wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Well the new FF3 sucks… the whole font rendering system is horrible the fonts constantly changing size and appears all whacked when it shouldn’t, already uninstalled and went back to FF2 since it doesn’t have this problem!</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>huh??</p>
<p>i&#8217;m a bit sensitive to font issues myself, but i have no idea what you&#8217;re talking about.</p>
<p>so far i&#8217;m loving FF3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-vulnerability-found-in-5-hours/comment-page-1/#comment-139555</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13230#comment-139555</guid>
		<description>Well the new FF3 sucks... the whole font rendering system is horrible the fonts constantly changing size and appears all whacked when it shouldn&#039;t, already uninstalled and went back to FF2 since it doesn&#039;t have this problem!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the new FF3 sucks&#8230; the whole font rendering system is horrible the fonts constantly changing size and appears all whacked when it shouldn&#8217;t, already uninstalled and went back to FF2 since it doesn&#8217;t have this problem!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asgard</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-vulnerability-found-in-5-hours/comment-page-1/#comment-139551</link>
		<dc:creator>Asgard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13230#comment-139551</guid>
		<description>Hehe sorry man :)

That nick was automatically filled so I did not mean to use your nick... Did you know that mr. Smithers is gay? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe sorry man <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>That nick was automatically filled so I did not mean to use your nick&#8230; Did you know that mr. Smithers is gay? <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-vulnerability-found-in-5-hours/comment-page-1/#comment-139550</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13230#comment-139550</guid>
		<description>The final product crashes more than the beta!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The final product crashes more than the beta!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smithers (first one)</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-vulnerability-found-in-5-hours/comment-page-1/#comment-139545</link>
		<dc:creator>Smithers (first one)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13230#comment-139545</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-139543&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Smithers wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;IE7 version of this news report:

IE7 IS NOT SECURE!

No one has downloaded IE7 since Tuesday, but it took only five seconds for the browser’s first critical vulnerability to be discovered. Details about the vulnerability can be viewed through MSDN, and Linux fanboys has said that there’s over 100 known exploits for the bug at this time.

At this point very much is known about the vulnerability and you just would have to click on a link to initiate it:

Successful exploitation of the vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code. It works just by clicking on a link in email or visiting a malicious web page.

Only god knows when a patch is available to plug the hole. Total FAILURE! MS is so pathetic! Download Firefox!

This site is the best because it is not a site like that (like pathetic theinquirer.net for example).&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Please stop posting under my alias...  :&#124;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-139543" rel="nofollow">Smithers wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>IE7 version of this news report:</p>
<p>IE7 IS NOT SECURE!</p>
<p>No one has downloaded IE7 since Tuesday, but it took only five seconds for the browser’s first critical vulnerability to be discovered. Details about the vulnerability can be viewed through MSDN, and Linux fanboys has said that there’s over 100 known exploits for the bug at this time.</p>
<p>At this point very much is known about the vulnerability and you just would have to click on a link to initiate it:</p>
<p>Successful exploitation of the vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code. It works just by clicking on a link in email or visiting a malicious web page.</p>
<p>Only god knows when a patch is available to plug the hole. Total FAILURE! MS is so pathetic! Download Firefox!</p>
<p>This site is the best because it is not a site like that (like pathetic theinquirer.net for example).</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Please stop posting under my alias&#8230;  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif' alt=':|' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
