<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Firefox 3 Vulnerability Found in 5-hours</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-vulnerability-found-in-5-hours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-vulnerability-found-in-5-hours/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:40:50 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Firefoxy</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-vulnerability-found-in-5-hours/#comment-157776</link> <dc:creator>Firefoxy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 00:35:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13230#comment-157776</guid> <description>Latest version- Firefox 7 is awesome &lt;3&lt;3&lt;3 I luv firefox!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Latest version- Firefox 7 is awesome &lt;3&lt;3&lt;3 I luv firefox!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-vulnerability-found-in-5-hours/#comment-139652</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:05:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13230#comment-139652</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-139591&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Guru wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Firefox 2.0.0.15 has been pushed back to July 1st because of this. A respin was just done on Friday, June 20th.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Interesting that the release got pushed back because of this. You would have thought that this would bring the 2.0.0.15 release even sooner. Heck, even Flock grabbed the patch from Mozilla&#039;s servers, incorporated it into their current version, and already posted the new release.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-139591" rel="nofollow">The Guru wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Firefox 2.0.0.15 has been pushed back to July 1st because of this. A respin was just done on Friday, June 20th.</p></blockquote></div><p>Interesting that the release got pushed back because of this. You would have thought that this would bring the 2.0.0.15 release even sooner. Heck, even Flock grabbed the patch from Mozilla&#8217;s servers, incorporated it into their current version, and already posted the new release.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Firefox 3 Vulnerability Found &#171; Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-vulnerability-found-in-5-hours/#comment-139592</link> <dc:creator>Firefox 3 Vulnerability Found &#171; Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:23:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13230#comment-139592</guid> <description>[...] CyberNet News [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CyberNet News [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Guru</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-vulnerability-found-in-5-hours/#comment-139591</link> <dc:creator>The Guru</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:18:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13230#comment-139591</guid> <description>Firefox 2.0.0.15 has been pushed back to July 1st because of this. A respin was just done on Friday, June 20th.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox 2.0.0.15 has been pushed back to July 1st because of this. A respin was just done on Friday, June 20th.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Guru</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-vulnerability-found-in-5-hours/#comment-139583</link> <dc:creator>The Guru</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:31:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13230#comment-139583</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-139565&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ryan wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-139550&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ken wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The final product crashes more than the beta!!!!&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; You might want to try starting with a fresh profile… I haven’t had Firefox 3 crash on me in months.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; You are not trying hard enough.  :P</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-139565" rel="nofollow">Ryan wrote:</a><br /><blockquote><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-139550" rel="nofollow">Ken wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>The final product crashes more than the beta!!!!</p></blockquote></div><p>You might want to try starting with a fresh profile… I haven’t had Firefox 3 crash on me in months.</p></blockquote></div><p>You are not trying hard enough. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-vulnerability-found-in-5-hours/#comment-139565</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:44:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13230#comment-139565</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-139530&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;James wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I have a feeling the anonymous tipster behind it waited until the Firefox 3.0 release in order rain on Mozilla’s parade as he may have found it a while ago in RC or Beta earlier as RC2 on Windows/Linux is the same as Final for example as RC3 was mainly for Mac.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; I&#039;m sure that&#039;s exactly what happened, which is unfortunate. I guess we just have to be happy that it wasn&#039;t publicly disclosed.&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-139550&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ken wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The final product crashes more than the beta!!!!&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; You might want to try starting with a fresh profile... I haven&#039;t had Firefox 3 crash on me in months.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-139530" rel="nofollow">James wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>I have a feeling the anonymous tipster behind it waited until the Firefox 3.0 release in order rain on Mozilla’s parade as he may have found it a while ago in RC or Beta earlier as RC2 on Windows/Linux is the same as Final for example as RC3 was mainly for Mac.</p></blockquote></div><p>I&#8217;m sure that&#8217;s exactly what happened, which is unfortunate. I guess we just have to be happy that it wasn&#8217;t publicly disclosed.</p><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-139550" rel="nofollow">Ken wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>The final product crashes more than the beta!!!!</p></blockquote></div><p>You might want to try starting with a fresh profile&#8230; I haven&#8217;t had Firefox 3 crash on me in months.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JK</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-vulnerability-found-in-5-hours/#comment-139559</link> <dc:creator>JK</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:59:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13230#comment-139559</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-139555&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Andrew wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Well the new FF3 sucks… the whole font rendering system is horrible the fonts constantly changing size and appears all whacked when it shouldn’t, already uninstalled and went back to FF2 since it doesn’t have this problem!&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;huh??i&#039;m a bit sensitive to font issues myself, but i have no idea what you&#039;re talking about.so far i&#039;m loving FF3.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-139555" rel="nofollow">Andrew wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Well the new FF3 sucks… the whole font rendering system is horrible the fonts constantly changing size and appears all whacked when it shouldn’t, already uninstalled and went back to FF2 since it doesn’t have this problem!</p></blockquote></div><p>huh??</p><p>i&#8217;m a bit sensitive to font issues myself, but i have no idea what you&#8217;re talking about.</p><p>so far i&#8217;m loving FF3.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-vulnerability-found-in-5-hours/#comment-139555</link> <dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:02:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13230#comment-139555</guid> <description>Well the new FF3 sucks... the whole font rendering system is horrible the fonts constantly changing size and appears all whacked when it shouldn&#039;t, already uninstalled and went back to FF2 since it doesn&#039;t have this problem!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the new FF3 sucks&#8230; the whole font rendering system is horrible the fonts constantly changing size and appears all whacked when it shouldn&#8217;t, already uninstalled and went back to FF2 since it doesn&#8217;t have this problem!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Asgard</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-vulnerability-found-in-5-hours/#comment-139551</link> <dc:creator>Asgard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:52:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13230#comment-139551</guid> <description>Hehe sorry man :)That nick was automatically filled so I did not mean to use your nick... Did you know that mr. Smithers is gay? ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe sorry man <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>That nick was automatically filled so I did not mean to use your nick&#8230; Did you know that mr. Smithers is gay? <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ken</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-3-vulnerability-found-in-5-hours/#comment-139550</link> <dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:50:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13230#comment-139550</guid> <description>The final product crashes more than the beta!!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The final product crashes more than the beta!!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 304/323 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-02-13 09:41:50 -->
