<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Half of Firefox Extensions Not Compatible with 3.1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-31-extensions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-31-extensions/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:57:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-31-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-145988</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15771#comment-145988</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-145927&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;netster007x wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;You think Fx3’s method is unintuitive?  In Chrome you do it by dragging the “add bookmark” star button to the bookmarks bar.  Doesn’t bother me, though, as I just click the star since it’s just a single click and I never sort (just search).&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Huh, I haven&#039;t used Chrome enough to have realized that. I do know that Chrome&#039;s tab tearing isn&#039;t nearly as sensitive as Firefox&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-145927" rel="nofollow">netster007x wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>You think Fx3’s method is unintuitive?  In Chrome you do it by dragging the “add bookmark” star button to the bookmarks bar.  Doesn’t bother me, though, as I just click the star since it’s just a single click and I never sort (just search).</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Huh, I haven&#8217;t used Chrome enough to have realized that. I do know that Chrome&#8217;s tab tearing isn&#8217;t nearly as sensitive as Firefox&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: netster007x</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-31-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-145927</link>
		<dc:creator>netster007x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15771#comment-145927</guid>
		<description>You think Fx3&#039;s method is unintuitive?  In Chrome you do it by dragging the &quot;add bookmark&quot; star button to the bookmarks bar.  Doesn&#039;t bother me, though, as I just click the star since it&#039;s just a single click and I never sort (just search).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You think Fx3&#8217;s method is unintuitive?  In Chrome you do it by dragging the &#8220;add bookmark&#8221; star button to the bookmarks bar.  Doesn&#8217;t bother me, though, as I just click the star since it&#8217;s just a single click and I never sort (just search).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Guru</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-31-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-145919</link>
		<dc:creator>El Guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15771#comment-145919</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-145899&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ryan wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-145235&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;netster007x wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;@Ryan: Try dragging the site favicon to to ur bookmarks :)&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;Huh, never really thought about that. It just doesn’t seem as intuitive to me though. I wish there was a way to disable the detaching feature, but I’m not sure Mozilla is going to offer that anytime soon. Thanks for the tip though… I’ll be using that.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Sadly after looking high and low, I have found no way of turning off the tab tearing other than reverting back to Beta 1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-145899" rel="nofollow">Ryan wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-145235" rel="nofollow">netster007x wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>@Ryan: Try dragging the site favicon to to ur bookmarks <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Huh, never really thought about that. It just doesn’t seem as intuitive to me though. I wish there was a way to disable the detaching feature, but I’m not sure Mozilla is going to offer that anytime soon. Thanks for the tip though… I’ll be using that.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Sadly after looking high and low, I have found no way of turning off the tab tearing other than reverting back to Beta 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-31-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-145899</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15771#comment-145899</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-145235&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;netster007x wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;@Ryan: Try dragging the site favicon to to ur bookmarks :)&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Huh, never really thought about that. It just doesn&#039;t seem as intuitive to me though. I wish there was a way to disable the detaching feature, but I&#039;m not sure Mozilla is going to offer that anytime soon. Thanks for the tip though... I&#039;ll be using that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-145235" rel="nofollow">netster007x wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>@Ryan: Try dragging the site favicon to to ur bookmarks <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Huh, never really thought about that. It just doesn&#8217;t seem as intuitive to me though. I wish there was a way to disable the detaching feature, but I&#8217;m not sure Mozilla is going to offer that anytime soon. Thanks for the tip though&#8230; I&#8217;ll be using that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Guru</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-31-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-145430</link>
		<dc:creator>El Guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15771#comment-145430</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-145235&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;netster007x wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;@Ryan: Try dragging the site favicon to to ur bookmarks :)&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
That is the way I&#039;ve always been doing it. But I&#039;ve noticed a lot of people try to drag the tab.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-145235" rel="nofollow">netster007x wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>@Ryan: Try dragging the site favicon to to ur bookmarks <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>That is the way I&#8217;ve always been doing it. But I&#8217;ve noticed a lot of people try to drag the tab.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: netster007x</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-31-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-145235</link>
		<dc:creator>netster007x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 22:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15771#comment-145235</guid>
		<description>@Ryan: Try dragging the site favicon to to ur bookmarks :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ryan: Try dragging the site favicon to to ur bookmarks <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-31-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-145068</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 01:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15771#comment-145068</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-144861&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;El Guru wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;One feature they need to fix and/or remove is the tab tearing. It is way too sensitive and a feature I really don’t have a use for. Worse yet I have poured over MozillaZine only to be disappointed to learn there is no way to turn this feature off. :(&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
That feature has actually been pissing me off lately. I used to be able to drag tabs into my bookmarks, but with the tab tearing I can&#039;t don&#039;t that anymore. It definitely needs some work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-144861" rel="nofollow">El Guru wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>One feature they need to fix and/or remove is the tab tearing. It is way too sensitive and a feature I really don’t have a use for. Worse yet I have poured over MozillaZine only to be disappointed to learn there is no way to turn this feature off. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>That feature has actually been pissing me off lately. I used to be able to drag tabs into my bookmarks, but with the tab tearing I can&#8217;t don&#8217;t that anymore. It definitely needs some work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Guru</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-31-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-144861</link>
		<dc:creator>El Guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 05:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15771#comment-144861</guid>
		<description>One feature they need to fix and/or remove is the tab tearing. It is way too sensitive and a feature I really don&#039;t have a use for. Worse yet I have poured over MozillaZine only to be disappointed to learn there is no way to turn this feature off. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One feature they need to fix and/or remove is the tab tearing. It is way too sensitive and a feature I really don&#8217;t have a use for. Worse yet I have poured over MozillaZine only to be disappointed to learn there is no way to turn this feature off. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Change</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-31-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-144840</link>
		<dc:creator>Change</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15771#comment-144840</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure how useful a compatibility check would be as you would need to upgrade sooner or later anyway. Perhaps it would help right after a new version has been released, but is it worth the effort then? You&#039;d effectively prevent people from upgrading to a better version (better experience, security, speed etc.) as there will always be extensions which won&#039;t get updated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure how useful a compatibility check would be as you would need to upgrade sooner or later anyway. Perhaps it would help right after a new version has been released, but is it worth the effort then? You&#8217;d effectively prevent people from upgrading to a better version (better experience, security, speed etc.) as there will always be extensions which won&#8217;t get updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-31-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-144837</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15771#comment-144837</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-144807&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;El Guru wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Back in June when we first started hearing about Firefox 3.1, it was made to sound as if it were going to a simple update from Firefox 3. A chance to get those features that were wanted in Firefox 3, but not quite ready at release time. It wasn’t suppose to be anything major that would cause so many issues with add-ons not working.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I wish that were the case, but they are definitely trying to clean things up in their code as well. It&#039;s their &quot;cleanup&quot; process that killed my extension a few times.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-144810&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Storytellerofsci-fi wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I don’t understand why Mozilla doesn’t have a compatibility browser check Utility that runs first and then asks if you want to Upgrade after it first shows you what Add-ons won’t function.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I actually thought they did have that if you&#039;re upgrading through the built-in upgrader. If you&#039;re just downloading the installer, however, I don&#039;t think it checks that. So it&#039;s really just the testers that don&#039;t get this convenience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-144807" rel="nofollow">El Guru wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Back in June when we first started hearing about Firefox 3.1, it was made to sound as if it were going to a simple update from Firefox 3. A chance to get those features that were wanted in Firefox 3, but not quite ready at release time. It wasn’t suppose to be anything major that would cause so many issues with add-ons not working.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I wish that were the case, but they are definitely trying to clean things up in their code as well. It&#8217;s their &#8220;cleanup&#8221; process that killed my extension a few times.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-144810" rel="nofollow">Storytellerofsci-fi wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I don’t understand why Mozilla doesn’t have a compatibility browser check Utility that runs first and then asks if you want to Upgrade after it first shows you what Add-ons won’t function.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I actually thought they did have that if you&#8217;re upgrading through the built-in upgrader. If you&#8217;re just downloading the installer, however, I don&#8217;t think it checks that. So it&#8217;s really just the testers that don&#8217;t get this convenience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
