Comments on: Firefox 3.1 to Get More JavaScript Speed Optimizations http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-31-to-get-more-javascript-speed-optimizations/ Technology News Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:29:52 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: blah http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-31-to-get-more-javascript-speed-optimizations/comment-page-1/#comment-146426 blah Thu, 15 Jan 2009 04:40:14 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15012#comment-146426 @ anonymous ...it doesnt suck like chrome @ anonymous …it doesnt suck like chrome

]]> By: Anonymous http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-31-to-get-more-javascript-speed-optimizations/comment-page-1/#comment-146393 Anonymous Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:01:13 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15012#comment-146393 How does this compare to Google Chrome? How does this compare to Google Chrome?

]]> By: Ryan http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-31-to-get-more-javascript-speed-optimizations/comment-page-1/#comment-146387 Ryan Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:17:27 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15012#comment-146387 <div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-146345" rel="nofollow">Brian wrote:</a><blockquote>the 1/11/2009 nightly of 3.1b3pre does this test in 1442.4ms. They shaved another 200ms off the time.</blockquote></div> Nice! Mozilla is really putting a lot of focus on speed it seems. Brian wrote:
the 1/11/2009 nightly of 3.1b3pre does this test in 1442.4ms. They shaved another 200ms off the time.

Nice! Mozilla is really putting a lot of focus on speed it seems.

]]> By: Brian http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-31-to-get-more-javascript-speed-optimizations/comment-page-1/#comment-146345 Brian Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:08:47 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15012#comment-146345 the 1/11/2009 nightly of 3.1b3pre does this test in 1442.4ms. They shaved another 200ms off the time. the 1/11/2009 nightly of 3.1b3pre does this test in 1442.4ms. They shaved another 200ms off the time.

]]> By: Ryan http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-31-to-get-more-javascript-speed-optimizations/comment-page-1/#comment-142657 Ryan Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:18:14 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15012#comment-142657 It's definitely not the most stable thing to use right now, but given how new it is I'm sure there will be a lot of attention focused on it. It’s definitely not the most stable thing to use right now, but given how new it is I’m sure there will be a lot of attention focused on it.

]]> By: hAiRiL http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-31-to-get-more-javascript-speed-optimizations/comment-page-1/#comment-142645 hAiRiL Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:54:02 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15012#comment-142645 <div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-142630" rel="nofollow">xpgeek wrote:</a><blockquote>Tempted to play with it now, but reading Trunk build threads on Mozillazine forums, seems a bit crashy with it enabled right now.</blockquote></div> yea. was surprised www.engadget.com crashed on me. had to disable it xpgeek wrote:
Tempted to play with it now, but reading Trunk build threads on Mozillazine forums, seems a bit crashy with it enabled right now.

yea. was surprised [engadget.com] crashed on me. had to disable it

]]> By: pinkman1 http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-31-to-get-more-javascript-speed-optimizations/comment-page-1/#comment-142640 pinkman1 Tue, 26 Aug 2008 06:44:40 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15012#comment-142640 :arrow: can't not wait for A1 FireFox is a reason to use the web :arrow: can’t not wait for A1

FireFox is a reason to use the web

]]> By: xpgeek http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-31-to-get-more-javascript-speed-optimizations/comment-page-1/#comment-142630 xpgeek Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:48:15 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15012#comment-142630 Tempted to play with it now, but reading Trunk build threads on Mozillazine forums, seems a bit crashy with it enabled right now. Tempted to play with it now, but reading Trunk build threads on Mozillazine forums, seems a bit crashy with it enabled right now.

]]>