Comments on: Flock Will Be Based On Firefox 2 http://cybernetnews.com/flock-will-be-based-on-firefox-2/ Technology News Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:03:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: ffextensionguruhttp://cybernetnews.com/flock-will-be-based-on-firefox-2/#comment-25284 ffextensionguru Sun, 01 Oct 2006 21:52:27 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/29/flock-will-be-based-on-firefox-2/#comment-25284 Also, I tried running the latest trunk version but it seemed very unstable (sorta like Minefield) so I reverted back to 0.7.6, for now. Looking forward to see what 0.8.1 will have to offer once they get a little further along in the development. Also, I tried running the latest trunk version but it seemed very unstable (sorta like Minefield) so I reverted back to 0.7.6, for now. Looking forward to see what 0.8.1 will have to offer once they get a little further along in the development.

]]> By: ffextensionguruhttp://cybernetnews.com/flock-will-be-based-on-firefox-2/#comment-25283 ffextensionguru Sun, 01 Oct 2006 21:50:19 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/29/flock-will-be-based-on-firefox-2/#comment-25283 I like Flock's built-in news handler as well as the bloging options. But do too miss the spell checker. I was able to get Spellbound to work via the Flock'd extension, but I stile have to remember to run it! :roll: I like Flock’s built-in news handler as well as the bloging options. But do too miss the spell checker. I was able to get Spellbound to work via the Flock’d extension, but I stile have to remember to run it! :roll:

]]> By: Ryanhttp://cybernetnews.com/flock-will-be-based-on-firefox-2/#comment-24949 Ryan Sat, 30 Sep 2006 03:31:24 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/29/flock-will-be-based-on-firefox-2/#comment-24949 <div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-24914">WIll Pate wrote:</a><blockquote>Yeah, we're pretty pysched about having Flock 0.8 powered by Firefox 2.0. Don't worry, inline spell checking is probably just broken right now while we're in a dev sprint.</blockquote></div> I am sure you guys are keeping yourself busy over there and I'm confident that you'll make Flock 0.8 an amazing release just like the previous versions. Of course it looks like you all had some fun at the park riding the duck. :)(for those not aware of the duck type about:duck in Flock) WIll Pate wrote:
Yeah, we’re pretty pysched about having Flock 0.8 powered by Firefox 2.0. Don’t worry, inline spell checking is probably just broken right now while we’re in a dev sprint.

I am sure you guys are keeping yourself busy over there and I’m confident that you’ll make Flock 0.8 an amazing release just like the previous versions. Of course it looks like you all had some fun at the park riding the duck. :)

(for those not aware of the duck type about:duck in Flock)

]]> By: ffextensionguruhttp://cybernetnews.com/flock-will-be-based-on-firefox-2/#comment-24927 ffextensionguru Sat, 30 Sep 2006 01:12:09 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/29/flock-will-be-based-on-firefox-2/#comment-24927 Hmm, Flock is one I do NOT have, may have to take a look (if I had enough HD space left). Hmm, Flock is one I do NOT have, may have to take a look (if I had enough HD space left).

]]> By: WIll Patehttp://cybernetnews.com/flock-will-be-based-on-firefox-2/#comment-24914 WIll Pate Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:04:48 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/29/flock-will-be-based-on-firefox-2/#comment-24914 Yeah, we're pretty pysched about having Flock 0.8 powered by Firefox 2.0. Don't worry, inline spell checking is probably just broken right now while we're in a dev sprint. Yeah, we’re pretty pysched about having Flock 0.8 powered by Firefox 2.0. Don’t worry, inline spell checking is probably just broken right now while we’re in a dev sprint.

]]>