<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Free ThreatFire Adds Extra Protection to Your PC</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 02:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/#comment-123174</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 03:27:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/18/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/#comment-123174</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-123018&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Geek wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;My question is how much does it slow down your computer?I think the best bet is to have a second computer running linux that you do all your random browsing or downloading with. Install the clamwin standalone executable, and then you can scan anything suspicious while in a safe environment.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Actually when I was using it there was very little memory and processor usage being dedicated to the program. As with some programs it my slow down your computer over time, but I didn&#039;t notice a difference in speed at first.&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-123039&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CoryC wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I hope it does better then the firewall which has a memory leak. It was using over 1,000,000 Kb of memory.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; That is definitely a bad memory leak, but I haven&#039;t noticed any issues with this program.&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-123054&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;S wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;you linked the article(first link in article) to a webroot product  not pc tools product. &lt;a href=&quot;http://cybernetnews.com/pc-tools-firewall-plus-30-a-free-vista-firewall/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://cybernetnews.com/2007/1.....-firewall/&lt;/a&gt; is the correct link&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Oops, thanks for the correct link. :oops:&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-123084&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;pacifika wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Installed it on two pcs, two scans found 2 hidden xml files in my temporary internet files which naturally shouldn’t be there - otherwise fine. Am impressed with it not having any noticable effect on performance on me, desktop search has a lot bigger slowdown then this. So even though I’m not running any realtime anti-spyware app, i can keep this running.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; I&#039;m glad it worked out well for you, and that you didn&#039;t have a big performance hit.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-123018" rel="nofollow">The Geek wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>My question is how much does it slow down your computer?</p><p>I think the best bet is to have a second computer running linux that you do all your random browsing or downloading with. Install the clamwin standalone executable, and then you can scan anything suspicious while in a safe environment.</p></blockquote></div><p>Actually when I was using it there was very little memory and processor usage being dedicated to the program. As with some programs it my slow down your computer over time, but I didn&#8217;t notice a difference in speed at first.</p><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-123039" rel="nofollow">CoryC wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>I hope it does better then the firewall which has a memory leak. It was using over 1,000,000 Kb of memory.</p></blockquote></div><p>That is definitely a bad memory leak, but I haven&#8217;t noticed any issues with this program.</p><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-123054" rel="nofollow">S wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>you linked the article(first link in article) to a webroot product  not pc tools product.<br /> <a href="[<a href='http://cybernetnews.com/pc-tools-firewall-plus-30-a-free-vista-firewall/' rel='nofollow'>cybernetnews.com</a>]" rel="nofollow">[<a href='http://cybernetnews.com/2007/1&#8230;..-firewall/' rel='nofollow'>cybernetnews.com</a>]<br /> is the correct link</p></blockquote></div><p>Oops, thanks for the correct link. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_redface.gif' alt=':oops:' class='wp-smiley' /></p><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-123084" rel="nofollow">pacifika wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Installed it on two pcs, two scans found 2 hidden xml files in my temporary internet files which naturally shouldn’t be there &#8211; otherwise fine. Am impressed with it not having any noticable effect on performance on me, desktop search has a lot bigger slowdown then this. So even though I’m not running any realtime anti-spyware app, i can keep this running.</p></blockquote></div><p>I&#8217;m glad it worked out well for you, and that you didn&#8217;t have a big performance hit.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pacifika</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/#comment-123084</link> <dc:creator>pacifika</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:49:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/18/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/#comment-123084</guid> <description>Installed it on two pcs, two scans found 2 hidden xml files in my temporary internet files which naturally shouldn&#039;t be there - otherwise fine. Am impressed with it not having any noticable effect on performance on me, desktop search has a lot bigger slowdown then this. So even though I&#039;m not running any realtime anti-spyware app, i can keep this running.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Installed it on two pcs, two scans found 2 hidden xml files in my temporary internet files which naturally shouldn&#8217;t be there &#8211; otherwise fine. Am impressed with it not having any noticable effect on performance on me, desktop search has a lot bigger slowdown then this. So even though I&#8217;m not running any realtime anti-spyware app, i can keep this running.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: S</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/#comment-123054</link> <dc:creator>S</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:28:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/18/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/#comment-123054</guid> <description>you linked the article(first link in article) to a webroot product  not pc tools product. http://cybernetnews.com/pc-tools-firewall-plus-30-a-free-vista-firewall/ is the correct link</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you linked the article(first link in article) to a webroot product  not pc tools product.<br /> [<a href='http://cybernetnews.com/pc-tools-firewall-plus-30-a-free-vista-firewall/' rel='nofollow'>cybernetnews.com</a>]<br /> is the correct link</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CoryC</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/#comment-123039</link> <dc:creator>CoryC</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 02:44:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/18/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/#comment-123039</guid> <description>I hope it does better then the firewall which has a memory leak. It was using over 1,000,000 Kb of memory.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope it does better then the firewall which has a memory leak. It was using over 1,000,000 Kb of memory.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: douchrti</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/#comment-123037</link> <dc:creator>douchrti</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 01:25:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/18/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/#comment-123037</guid> <description>Thanks for the info. I&#039;ll check it out. It will be interesting to see how it performs on my puters.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info. I&#8217;ll check it out. It will be interesting to see how it performs on my puters.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Geek</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/#comment-123018</link> <dc:creator>The Geek</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 22:16:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/18/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/#comment-123018</guid> <description>My question is how much does it slow down your computer?I think the best bet is to have a second computer running linux that you do all your random browsing or downloading with. Install the clamwin standalone executable, and then you can scan anything suspicious while in a safe environment.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My question is how much does it slow down your computer?</p><p>I think the best bet is to have a second computer running linux that you do all your random browsing or downloading with. Install the clamwin standalone executable, and then you can scan anything suspicious while in a safe environment.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 258/279 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-27 00:54:27 -->
