<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free ThreatFire Adds Extra Protection to Your PC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:53:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-123174</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 03:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/18/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/#comment-123174</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-123018&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Geek wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;My question is how much does it slow down your computer?

I think the best bet is to have a second computer running linux that you do all your random browsing or downloading with. Install the clamwin standalone executable, and then you can scan anything suspicious while in a safe environment.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Actually when I was using it there was very little memory and processor usage being dedicated to the program. As with some programs it my slow down your computer over time, but I didn&#039;t notice a difference in speed at first.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-123039&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CoryC wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I hope it does better then the firewall which has a memory leak. It was using over 1,000,000 Kb of memory.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
That is definitely a bad memory leak, but I haven&#039;t noticed any issues with this program.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-123054&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;S wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;you linked the article(first link in article) to a webroot product  not pc tools product.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://cybernetnews.com/pc-tools-firewall-plus-30-a-free-vista-firewall/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://cybernetnews.com/2007/1.....-firewall/&lt;/a&gt;
is the correct link&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Oops, thanks for the correct link. :oops:

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-123084&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;pacifika wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Installed it on two pcs, two scans found 2 hidden xml files in my temporary internet files which naturally shouldn’t be there - otherwise fine. Am impressed with it not having any noticable effect on performance on me, desktop search has a lot bigger slowdown then this. So even though I’m not running any realtime anti-spyware app, i can keep this running.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I&#039;m glad it worked out well for you, and that you didn&#039;t have a big performance hit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-123018" rel="nofollow">The Geek wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>My question is how much does it slow down your computer?</p>
<p>I think the best bet is to have a second computer running linux that you do all your random browsing or downloading with. Install the clamwin standalone executable, and then you can scan anything suspicious while in a safe environment.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Actually when I was using it there was very little memory and processor usage being dedicated to the program. As with some programs it my slow down your computer over time, but I didn&#8217;t notice a difference in speed at first.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-123039" rel="nofollow">CoryC wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I hope it does better then the firewall which has a memory leak. It was using over 1,000,000 Kb of memory.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>That is definitely a bad memory leak, but I haven&#8217;t noticed any issues with this program.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-123054" rel="nofollow">S wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>you linked the article(first link in article) to a webroot product  not pc tools product.<br />
[<a href='http://cybernetnews.com/pc-tools-firewall-plus-30-a-free-vista-firewall/' rel='nofollow'>cybernetnews.com</a>]<br />
is the correct link</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Oops, thanks for the correct link. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_redface.gif' alt=':oops:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-123084" rel="nofollow">pacifika wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Installed it on two pcs, two scans found 2 hidden xml files in my temporary internet files which naturally shouldn’t be there &#8211; otherwise fine. Am impressed with it not having any noticable effect on performance on me, desktop search has a lot bigger slowdown then this. So even though I’m not running any realtime anti-spyware app, i can keep this running.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I&#8217;m glad it worked out well for you, and that you didn&#8217;t have a big performance hit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pacifika</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-123084</link>
		<dc:creator>pacifika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/18/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/#comment-123084</guid>
		<description>Installed it on two pcs, two scans found 2 hidden xml files in my temporary internet files which naturally shouldn&#039;t be there - otherwise fine. Am impressed with it not having any noticable effect on performance on me, desktop search has a lot bigger slowdown then this. So even though I&#039;m not running any realtime anti-spyware app, i can keep this running.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Installed it on two pcs, two scans found 2 hidden xml files in my temporary internet files which naturally shouldn&#8217;t be there &#8211; otherwise fine. Am impressed with it not having any noticable effect on performance on me, desktop search has a lot bigger slowdown then this. So even though I&#8217;m not running any realtime anti-spyware app, i can keep this running.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-123054</link>
		<dc:creator>S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/18/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/#comment-123054</guid>
		<description>you linked the article(first link in article) to a webroot product  not pc tools product. 
http://cybernetnews.com/pc-tools-firewall-plus-30-a-free-vista-firewall/ 
is the correct link</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you linked the article(first link in article) to a webroot product  not pc tools product.<br />
[<a href='http://cybernetnews.com/pc-tools-firewall-plus-30-a-free-vista-firewall/' rel='nofollow'>cybernetnews.com</a>]<br />
is the correct link</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoryC</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-123039</link>
		<dc:creator>CoryC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 02:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/18/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/#comment-123039</guid>
		<description>I hope it does better then the firewall which has a memory leak. It was using over 1,000,000 Kb of memory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope it does better then the firewall which has a memory leak. It was using over 1,000,000 Kb of memory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douchrti</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-123037</link>
		<dc:creator>douchrti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 01:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/18/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/#comment-123037</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info. I&#039;ll check it out. It will be interesting to see how it performs on my puters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info. I&#8217;ll check it out. It will be interesting to see how it performs on my puters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Geek</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-123018</link>
		<dc:creator>The Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 22:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/18/free-threatfire-adds-extra-protection-to-your-pc/#comment-123018</guid>
		<description>My question is how much does it slow down your computer?

I think the best bet is to have a second computer running linux that you do all your random browsing or downloading with. Install the clamwin standalone executable, and then you can scan anything suspicious while in a safe environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My question is how much does it slow down your computer?</p>
<p>I think the best bet is to have a second computer running linux that you do all your random browsing or downloading with. Install the clamwin standalone executable, and then you can scan anything suspicious while in a safe environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
