<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good-Riddance Snap Previews!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/good-riddance-snap-previews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/good-riddance-snap-previews/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:18:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: curtissthompson</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/good-riddance-snap-previews/comment-page-1/#comment-88339</link>
		<dc:creator>curtissthompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 02:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/01/good-riddance-snap-previews/#comment-88339</guid>
		<description>Ryan, I&#039;d definitely agree, I can&#039;t say for certain about much of their activities....but based on patterns in their posts and marketing, etc....I&#039;m fairly certain they not only get paid for things like the snapshot feature, but furthermore from the sites they promote, and I&#039;m about certain they pay or have connections with a certain top digger to submit their content and have it promoted on digg.

Things like intentionally stealing original content from bloggers and purporting it as his own discovery, without giving credit.  A great example is how he stole content from a blog post I submitted about the discovery of www.diggriver.com taking it for his own discovery, having a top digger submit it as a dupe and trying to selfishly promote his stole blog post over the original.  (The fact that he tried to dupe me doesn&#039;t bother me personally...it&#039;s that he intentionally stole content, purported as his own discovery without sourcing, then uses top digger to promote his content):
Original: http://www.digg.com/tech_news/DiggRiver_Official_Digg_Page_For_Mobile_Devices
Stolen Dupe: http://www.digg.com/tech_news/Digg_Mobile_Inspired_by_Dave_Winer

the original link blog has since been taken down...but if you follow the comments in both submissions it tells the tale pretty well.  Michael Arrington will do anything to get ahead in the blogosphere, no matter how he has to do it.  Even if it means using the most irresponsible, tool on digg to do it, as this is the worst digger I&#039;ve seen on digg(to list all the reasons would require another rant in and of itself ;) ).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan, I&#8217;d definitely agree, I can&#8217;t say for certain about much of their activities&#8230;.but based on patterns in their posts and marketing, etc&#8230;.I&#8217;m fairly certain they not only get paid for things like the snapshot feature, but furthermore from the sites they promote, and I&#8217;m about certain they pay or have connections with a certain top digger to submit their content and have it promoted on digg.</p>
<p>Things like intentionally stealing original content from bloggers and purporting it as his own discovery, without giving credit.  A great example is how he stole content from a blog post I submitted about the discovery of [<a href='http://www.diggriver.com' rel='nofollow'>diggriver.com</a>] taking it for his own discovery, having a top digger submit it as a dupe and trying to selfishly promote his stole blog post over the original.  (The fact that he tried to dupe me doesn&#8217;t bother me personally&#8230;it&#8217;s that he intentionally stole content, purported as his own discovery without sourcing, then uses top digger to promote his content):<br />
Original: [<a href='http://www.digg.com/tech_news/DiggRiver_Official_Digg_Page_For_Mobile_Devices' rel='nofollow'>digg.com</a>]<br />
Stolen Dupe: [<a href='http://www.digg.com/tech_news/Digg_Mobile_Inspired_by_Dave_Winer' rel='nofollow'>digg.com</a>]</p>
<p>the original link blog has since been taken down&#8230;but if you follow the comments in both submissions it tells the tale pretty well.  Michael Arrington will do anything to get ahead in the blogosphere, no matter how he has to do it.  Even if it means using the most irresponsible, tool on digg to do it, as this is the worst digger I&#8217;ve seen on digg(to list all the reasons would require another rant in and of itself <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/good-riddance-snap-previews/comment-page-1/#comment-88300</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 03:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/01/good-riddance-snap-previews/#comment-88300</guid>
		<description>Actually, the thing I&#039;m the most surprised with is that Websites don&#039;t offer some quick way to disable these Snap previews. Sure some people may like them, but I don&#039;t think it would be many. This is just a hunch but I have a feeling that TechCrunch uses them because there is probably something in it for them (maybe money?). TechCrunch is essentially advertising the service so I would guess that they&#039;re getting a kickback from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the thing I&#8217;m the most surprised with is that Websites don&#8217;t offer some quick way to disable these Snap previews. Sure some people may like them, but I don&#8217;t think it would be many. This is just a hunch but I have a feeling that TechCrunch uses them because there is probably something in it for them (maybe money?). TechCrunch is essentially advertising the service so I would guess that they&#8217;re getting a kickback from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curtissthompson</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/good-riddance-snap-previews/comment-page-1/#comment-88281</link>
		<dc:creator>curtissthompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 08:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/01/good-riddance-snap-previews/#comment-88281</guid>
		<description>Haha, thanks....I do tend to go off on passionate tangential rants, glad they are amusing. :lol:

btw...this workaround has gotten me to start viewing sites I refused to because of the snapshot feature.  I love how such simple tips, can have really wide-reaching effects (opening me up to new sites and content). :) 

Now if I could only do the same thing for those equally pesky advertisements that pop-up in the same fashion over specifically linked words.  :&#124;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, thanks&#8230;.I do tend to go off on passionate tangential rants, glad they are amusing. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>btw&#8230;this workaround has gotten me to start viewing sites I refused to because of the snapshot feature.  I love how such simple tips, can have really wide-reaching effects (opening me up to new sites and content). <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Now if I could only do the same thing for those equally pesky advertisements that pop-up in the same fashion over specifically linked words.  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif' alt=':|' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/good-riddance-snap-previews/comment-page-1/#comment-88278</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 05:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/01/good-riddance-snap-previews/#comment-88278</guid>
		<description>Oh... and your rants make me laugh sometimes :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh&#8230; and your rants make me laugh sometimes <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/good-riddance-snap-previews/comment-page-1/#comment-88277</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 05:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/01/good-riddance-snap-previews/#comment-88277</guid>
		<description>Your welcome Curtiss! I figured I wasn&#039;t the only one that would find it useful :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your welcome Curtiss! I figured I wasn&#8217;t the only one that would find it useful <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curtissthompson</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/good-riddance-snap-previews/comment-page-1/#comment-88272</link>
		<dc:creator>curtissthompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 23:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/01/good-riddance-snap-previews/#comment-88272</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never understood any reason to have such pop-ups like the snap previews or advertisements that do the same thing.  It drives me so crazy when browsing the web, that I&#039;ve actually blocked websites that use it, or just never visit them.

It&#039;s a useless tool, that has no practical purpose for implementation.  Not only does it slow things down, it&#039;s glitchy at times, and find myself wanting to close the pop-up previews, and having absolutely no way to do it, leaving me with no way to read content that it covers up.

TechCrunch uses it, and it&#039;s the only site that I view on a rare occasion that does.  (No, I don&#039;t like the site, I only visit to see his idiotic takes on news stories.  I hate the site and Michael Arrington with a fuming passion, as he&#039;s the most irresponsible, egotistical, arrogant, ignorant blogger I&#039;ve ever seen.  He sources information poorly, takes information significantly out of context or spins it, he takes valid news stories from other bloggers, and promotes it as something he was the first to discover, and from what I can tell seems to be paying a digg to submit and promote his content.)  :twisted:

Thanks for this workaround btw!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never understood any reason to have such pop-ups like the snap previews or advertisements that do the same thing.  It drives me so crazy when browsing the web, that I&#8217;ve actually blocked websites that use it, or just never visit them.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a useless tool, that has no practical purpose for implementation.  Not only does it slow things down, it&#8217;s glitchy at times, and find myself wanting to close the pop-up previews, and having absolutely no way to do it, leaving me with no way to read content that it covers up.</p>
<p>TechCrunch uses it, and it&#8217;s the only site that I view on a rare occasion that does.  (No, I don&#8217;t like the site, I only visit to see his idiotic takes on news stories.  I hate the site and Michael Arrington with a fuming passion, as he&#8217;s the most irresponsible, egotistical, arrogant, ignorant blogger I&#8217;ve ever seen.  He sources information poorly, takes information significantly out of context or spins it, he takes valid news stories from other bloggers, and promotes it as something he was the first to discover, and from what I can tell seems to be paying a digg to submit and promote his content.)  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif' alt=':twisted:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks for this workaround btw!  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rub3X</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/good-riddance-snap-previews/comment-page-1/#comment-87667</link>
		<dc:creator>Rub3X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 16:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/01/good-riddance-snap-previews/#comment-87667</guid>
		<description>I too find those pointless.  If he talks about the website as interesting, I&#039;ll click.  If I&#039;m curious I&#039;ll click.  A 1 inch thumb nail just gets in the way of the content.  I&#039;ll def never put this on my blog  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too find those pointless.  If he talks about the website as interesting, I&#8217;ll click.  If I&#8217;m curious I&#8217;ll click.  A 1 inch thumb nail just gets in the way of the content.  I&#8217;ll def never put this on my blog  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrankZ</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/good-riddance-snap-previews/comment-page-1/#comment-87657</link>
		<dc:creator>FrankZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 14:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/01/good-riddance-snap-previews/#comment-87657</guid>
		<description>Nobody likes Browster? I like this mouse-over preview for FF &amp; IE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody likes Browster? I like this mouse-over preview for FF &amp; IE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/good-riddance-snap-previews/comment-page-1/#comment-87637</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 05:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/01/good-riddance-snap-previews/#comment-87637</guid>
		<description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-87636&quot;&gt;Dude wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;
BTW, not to be picky, but CCleaner has had the cookie save feature for a long time.  It&#039;s just been hiding under options.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

Thanks for pointing that out :) As I mentioned.. I haven&#039;t actually used CCleaner myself. I saw that in the comments of Lifehacker and thought it was a nice feature to have, and one that people might benefit from.  Nice to know it&#039;s always been there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-87636">Dude wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>
BTW, not to be picky, but CCleaner has had the cookie save feature for a long time.  It&#8217;s just been hiding under options.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Thanks for pointing that out <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  As I mentioned.. I haven&#8217;t actually used CCleaner myself. I saw that in the comments of Lifehacker and thought it was a nice feature to have, and one that people might benefit from.  Nice to know it&#8217;s always been there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dude</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/good-riddance-snap-previews/comment-page-1/#comment-87636</link>
		<dc:creator>Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 05:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/01/good-riddance-snap-previews/#comment-87636</guid>
		<description>Thumbnails are nice when doing searches but thumbnails for links are a bit of a waste.  If I&#039;m interested in an article odds are I&#039;ll click on the relevant links in it.  I don&#039;t need to preview it.

BTW, not to be picky, but CCleaner has had the cookie save feature for a long time.  It&#039;s just been hiding under options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thumbnails are nice when doing searches but thumbnails for links are a bit of a waste.  If I&#8217;m interested in an article odds are I&#8217;ll click on the relevant links in it.  I don&#8217;t need to preview it.</p>
<p>BTW, not to be picky, but CCleaner has had the cookie save feature for a long time.  It&#8217;s just been hiding under options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
