<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Google Cancels Their Click-To-Call&#8230;Maybe?</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:03:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Italia SW &#187; Archivio &#187; Il blog di Google Blog &#232; stato &#34;vittima&#34; di un Hacker</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/#comment-26099</link> <dc:creator>Italia SW &#187; Archivio &#187; Il blog di Google Blog &#232; stato &#34;vittima&#34; di un Hacker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:32:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/07/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/#comment-26099</guid> <description>[...] Google has finalmente ammesso che la cancellazione del post Click-To-Call&#160; avvenuto nella giornata di ieri Ã¨ stato realizzato da un&#160;hacker. Bene, non si riferiscono alla persona come un hacker ma la chiamano &#8220;utente non autorizzato&#8221; (Ã¨ quantomeno carino non&#160;definire la persona che ha avuto l&#8217;accesso non autorizzato col termine appropriato ma, resta il fatto che sono stati vittima di un hacker..) [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google has finalmente ammesso che la cancellazione del post Click-To-Call&nbsp; avvenuto nella giornata di ieri Ã¨ stato realizzato da un&nbsp;hacker. Bene, non si riferiscono alla persona come un hacker ma la chiamano &#8220;utente non autorizzato&#8221; (Ã¨ quantomeno carino non&nbsp;definire la persona che ha avuto l&#8217;accesso non autorizzato col termine appropriato ma, resta il fatto che sono stati vittima di un hacker..) [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: curtissthompson</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/#comment-26033</link> <dc:creator>curtissthompson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 23:51:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/07/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/#comment-26033</guid> <description>Google has posted a retraction, explaining the post &lt;a href=&quot;http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/10/about-that-fake-post.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has posted a retraction, explaining the post [<a href='http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/10/about-that-fake-post.html.' rel='nofollow'>googleblog.blogspot.com</a>]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Publishers Thank Google for Book Saleseldavojohn writes &#8220;A few book -- Centplus Tech</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/#comment-25994</link> <dc:creator>Publishers Thank Google for Book Saleseldavojohn writes &#8220;A few book -- Centplus Tech</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 07:59:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/07/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/#comment-25994</guid> <description>[...] Google Cancels Their Click-To-Call Maybe?Google has apparently canceled their Click-To-Call feature according to a blog &#8230; I got the screenshot above from Google Blogoscoped and it shows how you &#8230; More information on how it works can be found in the Google Help section. &#8230; [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Cancels Their Click-To-Call Maybe?Google has apparently canceled their Click-To-Call feature according to a blog &#8230; I got the screenshot above from Google Blogoscoped and it shows how you &#8230; More information on how it works can be found in the Google Help section. &#8230; [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/#comment-25992</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 04:00:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/07/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/#comment-25992</guid> <description>Yep, looks like they removed it from their &quot;Recent Posts&quot; in their sidebar as well. I think you&#039;re right that it only sounds reasonable that it was a premature leak. That would probably be the reason that they haven&#039;t announced what happened.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, looks like they removed it from their &#8220;Recent Posts&#8221; in their sidebar as well. I think you&#8217;re right that it only sounds reasonable that it was a premature leak. That would probably be the reason that they haven&#8217;t announced what happened.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: curtissthompson</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/#comment-25991</link> <dc:creator>curtissthompson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 03:45:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/07/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/#comment-25991</guid> <description>Looks like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://googleblog.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google Blog&lt;/a&gt; removed the post from the RSS as well now.  Though it looks like it was fake, it could have also been speculation, or even an early announcement that was posted.  I can&#039;t see why Google hasn&#039;t officially come out and posted a retraction, explaining all this, unless maybe this was a premature leak.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the [<a href='http://googleblog.blogspot.com/' rel='nofollow'>googleblog.blogspot.com</a>] removed the post from the RSS as well now.  Though it looks like it was fake, it could have also been speculation, or even an early announcement that was posted.  I can&#8217;t see why Google hasn&#8217;t officially come out and posted a retraction, explaining all this, unless maybe this was a premature leak.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: curtissthompson</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/#comment-25990</link> <dc:creator>curtissthompson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 01:05:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/07/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/#comment-25990</guid> <description>Here is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/curtissthompson/263410063/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;screenshot &lt;/a&gt;I took after I Ryan pointed out to me that my &lt;a href=&quot;http://digg.com/tech_news/Google_Cancels_Click_to_Call_Project&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Digg submission&lt;/a&gt; link to the blog post, was deleted immediately after submission.  The follow up links that I posted in the comments on the submission are those provided to me by Ryan (Thanks btw).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a [<a href='http://www.flickr.com/photos/curtissthompson/263410063/I' rel='nofollow'>flickr.com</a>] took after I Ryan pointed out to me that my [<a href='http://digg.com/tech_news/Google_Cancels_Click_to_Call_Project' rel='nofollow'>digg.com</a>] link to the blog post, was deleted immediately after submission.  The follow up links that I posted in the comments on the submission are those provided to me by Ryan (Thanks btw).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 248/267 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-02-13 09:24:13 -->
