<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome Master Password Still Non-Existent?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/google-chrome-master-password/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-chrome-master-password/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:45:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: HereWeGoAgain</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-chrome-master-password/comment-page-1/#comment-148640</link>
		<dc:creator>HereWeGoAgain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 02:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=16287#comment-148640</guid>
		<description>Diego Sierra wrote &quot;Have you noticed that the same thing happens with Firefox? I mean, just go to the Menu &gt; Tools &gt; Options &gt; Security &gt; Saved Passwords, and there is a “Show Passwords” button, I mean, it is as “safe” as Chrome.&quot;

The above is only true if a master password has NOT been set.
After you HAVE set a master password, you can only view your
saved password by again typing in the master password each
and every time you request to view the stored passwords.

One can argue about the strength of Firefox password encryption, 
but it does keep one&#039;s passwords hidden from the casual user (like
a kid buying stuff on Amazon.com with a parent&#039;s stored account password and account info!!!).

I REALLY want to use Google Chrome, but I simply can&#039;t until they plug this feature hole.  I call this a &quot;feature hole&quot; because, while Google is free to argue about how people don&#039;t need a master password, the fact is that people (myself included) want one. So rather than lecture Chrome users about why what they want is an &quot;illusion of security&quot;, Google should focus on how to deliver a master password feature that IS secure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diego Sierra wrote &#8220;Have you noticed that the same thing happens with Firefox? I mean, just go to the Menu &gt; Tools &gt; Options &gt; Security &gt; Saved Passwords, and there is a “Show Passwords” button, I mean, it is as “safe” as Chrome.&#8221;</p>
<p>The above is only true if a master password has NOT been set.<br />
After you HAVE set a master password, you can only view your<br />
saved password by again typing in the master password each<br />
and every time you request to view the stored passwords.</p>
<p>One can argue about the strength of Firefox password encryption,<br />
but it does keep one&#8217;s passwords hidden from the casual user (like<br />
a kid buying stuff on Amazon.com with a parent&#8217;s stored account password and account info!!!).</p>
<p>I REALLY want to use Google Chrome, but I simply can&#8217;t until they plug this feature hole.  I call this a &#8220;feature hole&#8221; because, while Google is free to argue about how people don&#8217;t need a master password, the fact is that people (myself included) want one. So rather than lecture Chrome users about why what they want is an &#8220;illusion of security&#8221;, Google should focus on how to deliver a master password feature that IS secure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cad Blog</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-chrome-master-password/comment-page-1/#comment-148160</link>
		<dc:creator>Cad Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 03:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=16287#comment-148160</guid>
		<description>I was thinking that the master password feature does look like an illusion of security but at least anyone who attempts to look for your password will have a hard time. Unlike if there was no password, it&#039;s like a sitting duck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking that the master password feature does look like an illusion of security but at least anyone who attempts to look for your password will have a hard time. Unlike if there was no password, it&#8217;s like a sitting duck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diego Sierra</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-chrome-master-password/comment-page-1/#comment-148122</link>
		<dc:creator>Diego Sierra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=16287#comment-148122</guid>
		<description>Have you noticed that the same thing happens with Firefox? I mean, just go to the Menu &gt; Tools &gt; Options &gt; Security &gt; Saved Passwords, and there is a &quot;Show Passwords&quot; button, I mean, it is as &quot;safe&quot; as Chrome.

As Vish wrote: 

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-146944&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Vish wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;If someone has physical access to your machine, its anyway easy for him get all your passwords and any other information(even with a master password). So, as he said, its an illusion of security.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

So now, or since I don&#039;t know when, anyone can see the saved passwords, sorry, but that is the stupidest thing I have ever seen. I hope Firefox takes it back. For the moment I think i&#039;ll start using Explorer, which I don&#039;t like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you noticed that the same thing happens with Firefox? I mean, just go to the Menu &gt; Tools &gt; Options &gt; Security &gt; Saved Passwords, and there is a &#8220;Show Passwords&#8221; button, I mean, it is as &#8220;safe&#8221; as Chrome.</p>
<p>As Vish wrote: </p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-146944" rel="nofollow">Vish wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>If someone has physical access to your machine, its anyway easy for him get all your passwords and any other information(even with a master password). So, as he said, its an illusion of security.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>So now, or since I don&#8217;t know when, anyone can see the saved passwords, sorry, but that is the stupidest thing I have ever seen. I hope Firefox takes it back. For the moment I think i&#8217;ll start using Explorer, which I don&#8217;t like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BritSwedeGuy</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-chrome-master-password/comment-page-1/#comment-146968</link>
		<dc:creator>BritSwedeGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=16287#comment-146968</guid>
		<description>ChromePass didn&#039;t work for me - maybe because I am on the dev path (version 2.0.164.0)
The internals of the chrome user profile have changed quite a bit since it was first released, any program that worked one day might well stop working shortly after.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ChromePass didn&#8217;t work for me &#8211; maybe because I am on the dev path (version 2.0.164.0)<br />
The internals of the chrome user profile have changed quite a bit since it was first released, any program that worked one day might well stop working shortly after.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scopri Tutte le Password Salvate su Google Chrome con ChromePass</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-chrome-master-password/comment-page-1/#comment-146959</link>
		<dc:creator>Scopri Tutte le Password Salvate su Google Chrome con ChromePass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=16287#comment-146959</guid>
		<description>[...] [Via]  heyos_ad_user = 8808; heyos_ad_type = &quot;G&quot;; heyos_ad_format = &quot;1&quot;; heyos_color_border = &quot;5BBF00&quot;; heyos_color_bg = &quot;F5FFEC&quot;; heyos_color_link = &quot;005B88&quot;; heyos_color_text = &quot;000000&quot;; heyos_color_url = &quot;0033FF&quot;;  Post simili6 Suggerimenti e Risorse per Usare al Meglio Google ChromeNuovo Aggiornameto di Google ChromeAnteprima delle tab di Firefox con ShowcaseScarica Rapidamente Ebooks da Google con Google Book Downloader Ecco le Prime ScreenShot di Google Chrome per Mac           Scrivi un commento [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Via]  heyos_ad_user = 8808; heyos_ad_type = &#8220;G&#8221;; heyos_ad_format = &#8220;1&#8243;; heyos_color_border = &#8220;5BBF00&#8243;; heyos_color_bg = &#8220;F5FFEC&#8221;; heyos_color_link = &#8220;005B88&#8243;; heyos_color_text = &#8220;000000&#8243;; heyos_color_url = &#8220;0033FF&#8221;;  Post simili6 Suggerimenti e Risorse per Usare al Meglio Google ChromeNuovo Aggiornameto di Google ChromeAnteprima delle tab di Firefox con ShowcaseScarica Rapidamente Ebooks da Google con Google Book Downloader Ecco le Prime ScreenShot di Google Chrome per Mac           Scrivi un commento [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Idodialog</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-chrome-master-password/comment-page-1/#comment-146956</link>
		<dc:creator>Idodialog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 06:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=16287#comment-146956</guid>
		<description>&quot;not stored in a manor that would keep&quot; - should be &quot;MANNER&quot;, strange coz manor is kind of rare and archaic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;not stored in a manor that would keep&#8221; &#8211; should be &#8220;MANNER&#8221;, strange coz manor is kind of rare and archaic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-chrome-master-password/comment-page-1/#comment-146948</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=16287#comment-146948</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-146940&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Michael Dobrofsky wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;In the meantime, I can’t go past Roboform. It’s brilliant.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Glad you are enjoying Roboform. It&#039;s definitely a good solution for storing passwords.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-146944&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Vish wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;If someone has physical access to your machine, its anyway easy for him get all your passwords and any other information(even with a master password). So, as he said, its an illusion of security.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
True, but Google could encrypt the password storage using your master password, and then it would pretty much require brute force to decrypt them. Also, I found this comment to be a rather good analogy:
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1397&amp;q=password&amp;colspec=ID%20Stars%20Pri%20Area%20Type%20Status%20Summary%20Modified%20Owner#c36</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-146940" rel="nofollow">Michael Dobrofsky wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>In the meantime, I can’t go past Roboform. It’s brilliant.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Glad you are enjoying Roboform. It&#8217;s definitely a good solution for storing passwords.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-146944" rel="nofollow">Vish wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>If someone has physical access to your machine, its anyway easy for him get all your passwords and any other information(even with a master password). So, as he said, its an illusion of security.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>True, but Google could encrypt the password storage using your master password, and then it would pretty much require brute force to decrypt them. Also, I found this comment to be a rather good analogy:<br />
[<a href='http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1397&#038;q=password&#038;colspec=ID%20Stars%20Pri%20Area%20Type%20Status%20Summary%20Modified%20Owner#c36' rel='nofollow'>code.google.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vish</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-chrome-master-password/comment-page-1/#comment-146944</link>
		<dc:creator>Vish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 02:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=16287#comment-146944</guid>
		<description>There was been a lot of discussion on this in Chrome&#039;s bug list.
I too was furious about the absence of master passwords until I read the comments on the bug.  See the bug @ http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=53 and the 13th comment about the resolution. If someone has physical access to your machine, its anyway easy for him get all your passwords and any other information(even with a master password). So, as he said, its an illusion of security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was been a lot of discussion on this in Chrome&#8217;s bug list.<br />
I too was furious about the absence of master passwords until I read the comments on the bug.  See the bug @ [<a href='http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=53' rel='nofollow'>code.google.com</a>] and the 13th comment about the resolution. If someone has physical access to your machine, its anyway easy for him get all your passwords and any other information(even with a master password). So, as he said, its an illusion of security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Dobrofsky</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-chrome-master-password/comment-page-1/#comment-146940</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Dobrofsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=16287#comment-146940</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t even trust Firefox, either...sadly :( It&#039;s one thing I don&#039;t trust a browser for yet. I wish FF would really secure their password storage - it&#039;d be a nice icing on the cake. In the meantime, I can&#039;t go past Roboform. It&#039;s brilliant. (Hope this doesn&#039;t sound infomercial-ish since I won a copy on Cybernet...hehe) ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t even trust Firefox, either&#8230;sadly <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  It&#8217;s one thing I don&#8217;t trust a browser for yet. I wish FF would really secure their password storage &#8211; it&#8217;d be a nice icing on the cake. In the meantime, I can&#8217;t go past Roboform. It&#8217;s brilliant. (Hope this doesn&#8217;t sound infomercial-ish since I won a copy on Cybernet&#8230;hehe) <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
