<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Google Docs Privacy Concerns</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/google-docs-privacy-concerns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-docs-privacy-concerns/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:03:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Jack Yan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-docs-privacy-concerns/#comment-152079</link> <dc:creator>Jack Yan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:43:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/31/google-docs-privacy-concerns/#comment-152079</guid> <description>Wow, the image is still accessible, in 2010. Guess nothing ever gets deleted.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, the image is still accessible, in 2010. Guess nothing ever gets deleted.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-docs-privacy-concerns/#comment-112625</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 16:03:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/31/google-docs-privacy-concerns/#comment-112625</guid> <description>There is some speculation whether they are really deleting the data, so if you have something sensitive then I recommend not using their service.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is some speculation whether they are really deleting the data, so if you have something sensitive then I recommend not using their service.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mano</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-docs-privacy-concerns/#comment-112569</link> <dc:creator>Mano</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 06:26:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/31/google-docs-privacy-concerns/#comment-112569</guid> <description>Are the really deleting our data from backup too? Ofcourse i agree it is for us. But i dont want that private data anywhere. Then, Is there any provision to delete our data from backup?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the really deleting our data from backup too? Ofcourse i agree it is for us. But i dont want that private data anywhere. Then, Is there any provision to delete our data from backup?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-docs-privacy-concerns/#comment-112278</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 01:03:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/31/google-docs-privacy-concerns/#comment-112278</guid> <description>Okay netster...thanks to your feedback I was able to duplicate the problem and fix it. Let me know if you notice it happening anymore.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay netster&#8230;thanks to your feedback I was able to duplicate the problem and fix it. Let me know if you notice it happening anymore.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-docs-privacy-concerns/#comment-112271</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:52:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/31/google-docs-privacy-concerns/#comment-112271</guid> <description>I would think that they would check to see if the user is logged in, but they obviously aren&#039;t. It&#039;s definitely a problem whether the file has been deleted or not.Okay...now that I know you were the first commenter that might help pinpoint the comment racking issue.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would think that they would check to see if the user is logged in, but they obviously aren&#8217;t. It&#8217;s definitely a problem whether the file has been deleted or not.</p><p>Okay&#8230;now that I know you were the first commenter that might help pinpoint the comment racking issue.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: netster007x</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-docs-privacy-concerns/#comment-112209</link> <dc:creator>netster007x</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:47:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/31/google-docs-privacy-concerns/#comment-112209</guid> <description>Could they make the image URL only accessible if there is a cookie for the right Google account?  I think it&#039;s nearly just as serious that anyone can access the images while the doc is active as it is that they are kept when the doc is deleted.Also, uho, the &quot;track new comments&quot; box is unchecked by default.  I checked it manually :(</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could they make the image URL only accessible if there is a cookie for the right Google account?  I think it&#8217;s nearly just as serious that anyone can access the images while the doc is active as it is that they are kept when the doc is deleted.</p><p>Also, uho, the &#8220;track new comments&#8221; box is unchecked by default.  I checked it manually <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 252/271 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-02-13 04:28:57 -->
