<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Google Docs &amp; Spreadsheets Overhaul Complete</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/google-docs-spreadsheets-overhaul-complete/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-docs-spreadsheets-overhaul-complete/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 02:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-docs-spreadsheets-overhaul-complete/#comment-99641</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 17:37:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/06/27/google-docs-spreadsheets-overhaul-complete/#comment-99641</guid> <description>...and Google Talk. Heck, most of their services could probably benefit from an expandable/collapsible folder list like this. Then I could group my contacts!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and Google Talk. Heck, most of their services could probably benefit from an expandable/collapsible folder list like this. Then I could group my contacts!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris Rossini</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-docs-spreadsheets-overhaul-complete/#comment-99595</link> <dc:creator>Chris Rossini</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 03:05:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/06/27/google-docs-spreadsheets-overhaul-complete/#comment-99595</guid> <description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-99588&quot;&gt;Ryan wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt; And actually, why not just integrate Google Docs with Gmail? They can have one unified sidebar that has expandable folders for both your Inbox and your documents.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;While they&#039;re at it, maybe they can throw Google Reader in there as well.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-99588">Ryan wrote:</a><br /><blockquote> And actually, why not just integrate Google Docs with Gmail? They can have one unified sidebar that has expandable folders for both your Inbox and your documents.</p></blockquote></div><p>While they&#8217;re at it, maybe they can throw Google Reader in there as well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-docs-spreadsheets-overhaul-complete/#comment-99588</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:55:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/06/27/google-docs-spreadsheets-overhaul-complete/#comment-99588</guid> <description>Google really did a great job with this design, and I would also like to seem them implement something similar in GMail as the other people stated above. I would even prefer to see this idea of folders implemented so that I can have nested labels...it would make organizing so much better!And actually, why not just integrate Google Docs with Gmail? They can have one unified sidebar that has expandable folders for both your Inbox and your documents.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google really did a great job with this design, and I would also like to seem them implement something similar in GMail as the other people stated above. I would even prefer to see this idea of folders implemented so that I can have nested labels&#8230;it would make organizing so much better!</p><p>And actually, why not just integrate Google Docs with Gmail? They can have one unified sidebar that has expandable folders for both your Inbox and your documents.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-docs-spreadsheets-overhaul-complete/#comment-99555</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:36:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/06/27/google-docs-spreadsheets-overhaul-complete/#comment-99555</guid> <description>They kept the tags and named them folders. For people who like folders (?!). But THOSE ARE NOT FOLDERS. You cannot have the same file in two folders - that&#039;s a rule. So now Google just &quot;sell&quot; the &lt;em&gt;tags&lt;/em&gt; idea with &lt;em&gt;folder&lt;/em&gt; name. It&#039;s a great change for the file list, but this is usefull for people who have there a lot of files. For the rest of us, the editor of the files is what matter, not the list of files.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They kept the tags and named them folders. For people who like folders (?!). But THOSE ARE NOT FOLDERS. You cannot have the same file in two folders &#8211; that&#8217;s a rule. So now Google just &#8220;sell&#8221; the <em>tags</em> idea with <em>folder</em> name. It&#8217;s a great change for the file list, but this is usefull for people who have there a lot of files. For the rest of us, the editor of the files is what matter, not the list of files.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Motang</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-docs-spreadsheets-overhaul-complete/#comment-99552</link> <dc:creator>Motang</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:11:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/06/27/google-docs-spreadsheets-overhaul-complete/#comment-99552</guid> <description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-99549&quot;&gt;Chris Rossini wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I like the new look...It makes me wonder if this new interface will be carried over to the other Google services.I, for one, like it better..so I hope so!&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Yeah I also like it better, and Gmail would look way better.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-99549">Chris Rossini wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>I like the new look&#8230;It makes me wonder if this new interface will be carried over to the other Google services.</p><p>I, for one, like it better..so I hope so!</p></blockquote></div><p>Yeah I also like it better, and Gmail would look way better.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ashley</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-docs-spreadsheets-overhaul-complete/#comment-99551</link> <dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:38:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/06/27/google-docs-spreadsheets-overhaul-complete/#comment-99551</guid> <description>Hmmm... would be nice to see the shiny blue in Gmail, wouldn&#039;t it?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; would be nice to see the shiny blue in Gmail, wouldn&#8217;t it?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris Rossini</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-docs-spreadsheets-overhaul-complete/#comment-99549</link> <dc:creator>Chris Rossini</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:06:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/06/27/google-docs-spreadsheets-overhaul-complete/#comment-99549</guid> <description>I like the new look...It makes me wonder if this new interface will be carried over to the other Google services.I, for one, like it better..so I hope so!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the new look&#8230;It makes me wonder if this new interface will be carried over to the other Google services.</p><p>I, for one, like it better..so I hope so!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 265/286 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-27 02:32:56 -->
