<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Google Introduces Google Desktop for Mac</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/google-introduces-google-desktop-for-mac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-introduces-google-desktop-for-mac/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 02:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: bloodsugarwilksm</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-introduces-google-desktop-for-mac/#comment-92606</link> <dc:creator>bloodsugarwilksm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 21:46:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/04/google-introduces-google-desktop-for-mac/#comment-92606</guid> <description>Yeah good points as well guys.  Google does seem to act like they can do something in everything no matter what it is and I think Ryan has brought up the point a few times - something like:Why doesn&#039;t Google just concentrate on their core products and make them the best they can be?  Better than everyone else, more features, stability etc.  Just make their most popular stuff killer and not worry about dipping their hands in every little niche.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah good points as well guys.  Google does seem to act like they can do something in everything no matter what it is and I think Ryan has brought up the point a few times &#8211; something like:</p><p>Why doesn&#8217;t Google just concentrate on their core products and make them the best they can be?  Better than everyone else, more features, stability etc.  Just make their most popular stuff killer and not worry about dipping their hands in every little niche.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris Rossini</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-introduces-google-desktop-for-mac/#comment-92600</link> <dc:creator>Chris Rossini</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:22:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/04/google-introduces-google-desktop-for-mac/#comment-92600</guid> <description>I agree with Ashley here. Google may not necessarily be looking to dominate Mac desktop search. They may be taking the attitude (not publicly of course) that they&#039;ll take what they can get.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Ashley here. Google may not necessarily be looking to dominate Mac desktop search. They may be taking the attitude (not publicly of course) that they&#8217;ll take what they can get.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JR</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-introduces-google-desktop-for-mac/#comment-92597</link> <dc:creator>JR</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:15:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/04/google-introduces-google-desktop-for-mac/#comment-92597</guid> <description>I am a huge Google fan and get excited almost every time they make an announcement - especially with regard to mac applications!  However, with a program like &lt;a href=&quot;http://quicksilver.blacktree.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Quicksilver&lt;/a&gt; out there for free, the Google Desktop Search for Mac&#039;s just won&#039;t be a crowd pleaser.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a huge Google fan and get excited almost every time they make an announcement &#8211; especially with regard to mac applications!  However, with a program like [<a href='http://quicksilver.blacktree.com/' rel='nofollow'>quicksilver.blacktree.com</a>] out there for free, the Google Desktop Search for Mac&#8217;s just won&#8217;t be a crowd pleaser.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ashley</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-introduces-google-desktop-for-mac/#comment-92595</link> <dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:10:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/04/google-introduces-google-desktop-for-mac/#comment-92595</guid> <description>While I generally like Google and most of the products that they have to offer- at times it seems as though they want to get their hand in everything. And not always does it work for them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I generally like Google and most of the products that they have to offer- at times it seems as though they want to get their hand in everything. And not always does it work for them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-introduces-google-desktop-for-mac/#comment-92589</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 19:57:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/04/google-introduces-google-desktop-for-mac/#comment-92589</guid> <description>I&#039;m in the same boat as you! I love Vista&#039;s built-in search because it is everywhere and much more integrated than Google&#039;s search can ever be. So I stay away from Google Desktop because the usefulness is nowhere near what it was on XP.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in the same boat as you! I love Vista&#8217;s built-in search because it is everywhere and much more integrated than Google&#8217;s search can ever be. So I stay away from Google Desktop because the usefulness is nowhere near what it was on XP.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bloodsugarwilksm</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-introduces-google-desktop-for-mac/#comment-92573</link> <dc:creator>bloodsugarwilksm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 18:49:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/04/google-introduces-google-desktop-for-mac/#comment-92573</guid> <description>See I just don&#039;t get it.  I would never use Google Desktop on my Vista machine because Vista&#039;s search is fine and works great.Similarly, Mac&#039;s Spotlight is awesome and does a fantastic job of indexing and searching Mac computers... so I don&#039;t know why Google developed a desktop search for Mac.  I understand why they did for XP but not for Mac.... oh well I still love Google!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See I just don&#8217;t get it.  I would never use Google Desktop on my Vista machine because Vista&#8217;s search is fine and works great.</p><p>Similarly, Mac&#8217;s Spotlight is awesome and does a fantastic job of indexing and searching Mac computers&#8230; so I don&#8217;t know why Google developed a desktop search for Mac.  I understand why they did for XP but not for Mac&#8230;. oh well I still love Google!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 254/275 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-27 02:40:55 -->
