<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Google Is Experimenting With A New Homepage</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/google-is-experimenting-with-a-new-homepage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-is-experimenting-with-a-new-homepage/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 02:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-is-experimenting-with-a-new-homepage/#comment-7413</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 03:11:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/05/29/google-is-experimenting-with-a-new-homepage/#comment-7413</guid> <description>I think you&#039;re right PhoenixP3K, it would be nice if Google came out with some snazzy page or maybe some skins for the Personalized Homepage.They should always offer the option to roll back to the old style because just like with Windows not everyone likes all that eye candy. Just because some people don&#039;t like the eye candy doesn&#039;t stop Microsoft from making more graphic intensive version of Windows though.-Ryan</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re right PhoenixP3K, it would be nice if Google came out with some snazzy page or maybe some skins for the Personalized Homepage.</p><p>They should always offer the option to roll back to the old style because just like with Windows not everyone likes all that eye candy. Just because some people don&#8217;t like the eye candy doesn&#8217;t stop Microsoft from making more graphic intensive version of Windows though.</p><p>-Ryan</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PhoenixP3K</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-is-experimenting-with-a-new-homepage/#comment-7408</link> <dc:creator>PhoenixP3K</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:58:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/05/29/google-is-experimenting-with-a-new-homepage/#comment-7408</guid> <description>I know Google is bent on classic style, I don&#039;t mind it much but we&#039;re in the era of eye-candy for both websites and operation systemss. I believe they could keep their website very simple and clean while not looking like a website from the 90&#039;s.I want to see a re-imaginating of Google design and given the option to roll back to the original if needed.Things that don&#039;t evolve don&#039;t need to be broken, they just are taken over by alternatives that evolved and they become extinct. It will not be the case of Google but I like change! Thats all :p</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know Google is bent on classic style, I don&#8217;t mind it much but we&#8217;re in the era of eye-candy for both websites and operation systemss. I believe they could keep their website very simple and clean while not looking like a website from the 90&#8242;s.</p><p>I want to see a re-imaginating of Google design and given the option to roll back to the original if needed.</p><p>Things that don&#8217;t evolve don&#8217;t need to be broken, they just are taken over by alternatives that evolved and they become extinct. It will not be the case of Google but I like change! Thats all :p</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Max</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-is-experimenting-with-a-new-homepage/#comment-3504</link> <dc:creator>Max</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 16:56:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/05/29/google-is-experimenting-with-a-new-homepage/#comment-3504</guid> <description>In my opinion, that looks very ugly. Google has a simple homepage that everyone recognizes. Don&#039;t fix what&#039;s not broken.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, that looks very ugly. Google has a simple homepage that everyone recognizes. Don&#8217;t fix what&#8217;s not broken.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 221/242 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-27 02:43:33 -->
