<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Google Not So Subtle When Advertising Firefox Now</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 02:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: ffextensionguru</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/#comment-50631</link> <dc:creator>ffextensionguru</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:37:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/08/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/#comment-50631</guid> <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Yes, we were blocked around two-months ago for being a â€œmiddle-man.â€ It was a little disappointing but there are still a lot of people that read the site so we werenâ€™t too bothered by it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;What the heck, you mean to tell me GEICO owns DIGG? :P</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Yes, we were blocked around two-months ago for being a â€œmiddle-man.â€ It was a little disappointing but there are still a lot of people that read the site so we werenâ€™t too bothered by it.</p></blockquote><p>What the heck, you mean to tell me GEICO owns DIGG? <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Someone</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/#comment-50530</link> <dc:creator>Someone</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 18:51:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/08/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/#comment-50530</guid> <description>Yeah I don&#039;t see the ad anywhere on Google&#039;s site when using IE.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I don&#8217;t see the ad anywhere on Google&#8217;s site when using IE.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/#comment-50503</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 16:40:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/08/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/#comment-50503</guid> <description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-50415&quot;&gt;Clazh wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;you been blocked on DIGG ???? too bad&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Yes, we were blocked around two-months ago for being a &quot;middle-man.&quot; It was a little disappointing but there are still a lot of people that read the site so we weren&#039;t too bothered by it.For all of those people who thinks this might be bogus I found it interesting that the original source reporting this is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.zdnet.com/micro-markets/?p=745&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ZDNet blog&lt;/a&gt; but they don&#039;t say how they came across it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-50415">Clazh wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>you been blocked on DIGG ???? too bad</p></blockquote></div><p>Yes, we were blocked around two-months ago for being a &#8220;middle-man.&#8221; It was a little disappointing but there are still a lot of people that read the site so we weren&#8217;t too bothered by it.</p><p>For all of those people who thinks this might be bogus I found it interesting that the original source reporting this is a [<a href='http://blogs.zdnet.com/micro-markets/?p=745' rel='nofollow'>blogs.zdnet.com</a>] but they don&#8217;t say how they came across it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Shannon</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/#comment-50452</link> <dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 14:14:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/08/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/#comment-50452</guid> <description>I do not have this bar.  I checked both personalized homepage and regular hompage.  Nothing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not have this bar.  I checked both personalized homepage and regular hompage.  Nothing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pdedecker</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/#comment-50442</link> <dc:creator>pdedecker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 13:24:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/08/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/#comment-50442</guid> <description>Update: I don&#039;t see the Firefox bar on Google either (I live in Belgium).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update: I don&#8217;t see the Firefox bar on Google either (I live in Belgium).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pdedecker</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/#comment-50436</link> <dc:creator>pdedecker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 12:56:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/08/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/#comment-50436</guid> <description>Yahoo! displays exactly the same message on their home page, but it promotes IE7 instead of Firefox:&lt;blockquote&gt;Yahoo! recommends upgrading to the NEW, safer Internet Explorer 7&lt;/blockquote&gt;Safer? I doubt it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo! displays exactly the same message on their home page, but it promotes IE7 instead of Firefox:</p><blockquote><p>Yahoo! recommends upgrading to the NEW, safer Internet Explorer 7</p></blockquote><p>Safer? I doubt it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Clazh</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/#comment-50415</link> <dc:creator>Clazh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 07:26:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/08/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/#comment-50415</guid> <description>you been blocked on DIGG ???? too bad</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you been blocked on DIGG ???? too bad</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CoryC</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/#comment-50385</link> <dc:creator>CoryC</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 00:28:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/08/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/#comment-50385</guid> <description>I think it&#039;s bogus.  It just happens that the Yahoo home page has an ad for IE 7 and it&#039;s says Yahoo is &quot;Optimized for IE 7&quot;. It&#039;s too similar in my opinion.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s bogus.  It just happens that the Yahoo home page has an ad for IE 7 and it&#8217;s says Yahoo is &#8220;Optimized for IE 7&#8243;. It&#8217;s too similar in my opinion.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 280/301 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-26 23:47:04 -->
