<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Not So Subtle When Advertising Firefox Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:45:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ffextensionguru</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/comment-page-1/#comment-50631</link>
		<dc:creator>ffextensionguru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/08/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/#comment-50631</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Yes, we were blocked around two-months ago for being a â€œmiddle-man.â€ It was a little disappointing but there are still a lot of people that read the site so we werenâ€™t too bothered by it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What the heck, you mean to tell me GEICO owns DIGG? :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Yes, we were blocked around two-months ago for being a â€œmiddle-man.â€ It was a little disappointing but there are still a lot of people that read the site so we werenâ€™t too bothered by it.</p></blockquote>
<p>What the heck, you mean to tell me GEICO owns DIGG? <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Someone</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/comment-page-1/#comment-50530</link>
		<dc:creator>Someone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 18:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/08/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/#comment-50530</guid>
		<description>Yeah I don&#039;t see the ad anywhere on Google&#039;s site when using IE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I don&#8217;t see the ad anywhere on Google&#8217;s site when using IE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/comment-page-1/#comment-50503</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 16:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/08/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/#comment-50503</guid>
		<description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-50415&quot;&gt;Clazh wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;you been blocked on DIGG ???? too bad&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Yes, we were blocked around two-months ago for being a &quot;middle-man.&quot; It was a little disappointing but there are still a lot of people that read the site so we weren&#039;t too bothered by it.

For all of those people who thinks this might be bogus I found it interesting that the original source reporting this is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.zdnet.com/micro-markets/?p=745&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ZDNet blog&lt;/a&gt; but they don&#039;t say how they came across it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-50415">Clazh wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>you been blocked on DIGG ???? too bad</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Yes, we were blocked around two-months ago for being a &#8220;middle-man.&#8221; It was a little disappointing but there are still a lot of people that read the site so we weren&#8217;t too bothered by it.</p>
<p>For all of those people who thinks this might be bogus I found it interesting that the original source reporting this is a [<a href='http://blogs.zdnet.com/micro-markets/?p=745' rel='nofollow'>blogs.zdnet.com</a>] but they don&#8217;t say how they came across it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/comment-page-1/#comment-50452</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 14:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/08/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/#comment-50452</guid>
		<description>I do not have this bar.  I checked both personalized homepage and regular hompage.  Nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not have this bar.  I checked both personalized homepage and regular hompage.  Nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdedecker</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/comment-page-1/#comment-50442</link>
		<dc:creator>pdedecker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 13:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/08/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/#comment-50442</guid>
		<description>Update: I don&#039;t see the Firefox bar on Google either (I live in Belgium).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update: I don&#8217;t see the Firefox bar on Google either (I live in Belgium).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdedecker</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/comment-page-1/#comment-50436</link>
		<dc:creator>pdedecker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 12:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/08/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/#comment-50436</guid>
		<description>Yahoo! displays exactly the same message on their home page, but it promotes IE7 instead of Firefox:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Yahoo! recommends upgrading to the NEW, safer Internet Explorer 7&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Safer? I doubt it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo! displays exactly the same message on their home page, but it promotes IE7 instead of Firefox:</p>
<blockquote><p>Yahoo! recommends upgrading to the NEW, safer Internet Explorer 7</p></blockquote>
<p>Safer? I doubt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clazh</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/comment-page-1/#comment-50415</link>
		<dc:creator>Clazh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 07:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/08/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/#comment-50415</guid>
		<description>you been blocked on DIGG ???? too bad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you been blocked on DIGG ???? too bad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoryC</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/comment-page-1/#comment-50385</link>
		<dc:creator>CoryC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 00:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/08/google-not-so-subtle-when-advertising-firefox-now/#comment-50385</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s bogus.  It just happens that the Yahoo home page has an ad for IE 7 and it&#039;s says Yahoo is &quot;Optimized for IE 7&quot;. It&#039;s too similar in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s bogus.  It just happens that the Yahoo home page has an ad for IE 7 and it&#8217;s says Yahoo is &#8220;Optimized for IE 7&#8243;. It&#8217;s too similar in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
