<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Pack gets New Security Software, but loses Firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/google-pack-gets-new-security-software-but-loses-firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-pack-gets-new-security-software-but-loses-firefox/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:30:02 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-pack-gets-new-security-software-but-loses-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-95480</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 11:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/03/27/google-pack-gets-new-security-software-but-loses-firefox/#comment-95480</guid>
		<description>Firefox is still part of the Google Pack but isn&#039;t showing up for any Windows Vista system. I have had the same problem.

Just Download Firefox from Google at the following link and it should be added to the Google pack..
http://goo.products.googlepages.com/home22</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox is still part of the Google Pack but isn&#8217;t showing up for any Windows Vista system. I have had the same problem.</p>
<p>Just Download Firefox from Google at the following link and it should be added to the Google pack..<br />
[<a href='http://goo.products.googlepages.com/home22' rel='nofollow'>goo.products.googlepages.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-pack-gets-new-security-software-but-loses-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-91119</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 01:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/03/27/google-pack-gets-new-security-software-but-loses-firefox/#comment-91119</guid>
		<description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-91113&quot;&gt;CoryC wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I&#039;m not surprised the Google isn&#039;t offering a free anti-virus solution, they get paid to distribute the software.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
That is true, and Google probably wouldn&#039;t be paying $2 for each Google Pack referal from the ads without them being paid to distribute the software.

&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-91114&quot;&gt;Max wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I thought Firefox was Vista Compatible. If it&#039;s not *officially* Vista compatible, then that might be the reason it doesn&#039;t show up.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I was wondering the same thing and just pulled up the Firefox requirements page. Looks like the latest version is only labeled as 98/XP compatible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-91113">CoryC wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I&#8217;m not surprised the Google isn&#8217;t offering a free anti-virus solution, they get paid to distribute the software.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>That is true, and Google probably wouldn&#8217;t be paying $2 for each Google Pack referal from the ads without them being paid to distribute the software.</p>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-91114">Max wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I thought Firefox was Vista Compatible. If it&#8217;s not *officially* Vista compatible, then that might be the reason it doesn&#8217;t show up.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I was wondering the same thing and just pulled up the Firefox requirements page. Looks like the latest version is only labeled as 98/XP compatible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClausValca</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-pack-gets-new-security-software-but-loses-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-91118</link>
		<dc:creator>ClausValca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 01:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/03/27/google-pack-gets-new-security-software-but-loses-firefox/#comment-91118</guid>
		<description>I am also seeing the same thing...and then something else as well:

...the Optional Software offerings of Real Player, Google Video Player, and GalleryPlayer HD Images don&#039;t show up either on my Vista system, while they do under my XP.

Seems to be that way under both IE and Mozilla engines.

Hmmmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also seeing the same thing&#8230;and then something else as well:</p>
<p>&#8230;the Optional Software offerings of Real Player, Google Video Player, and GalleryPlayer HD Images don&#8217;t show up either on my Vista system, while they do under my XP.</p>
<p>Seems to be that way under both IE and Mozilla engines.</p>
<p>Hmmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-pack-gets-new-security-software-but-loses-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-91114</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/03/27/google-pack-gets-new-security-software-but-loses-firefox/#comment-91114</guid>
		<description>I thought Firefox was Vista Compatible. If it&#039;s not *officially* Vista compatible, then that might be the reason it doesn&#039;t show up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Firefox was Vista Compatible. If it&#8217;s not *officially* Vista compatible, then that might be the reason it doesn&#8217;t show up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoryC</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-pack-gets-new-security-software-but-loses-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-91113</link>
		<dc:creator>CoryC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/03/27/google-pack-gets-new-security-software-but-loses-firefox/#comment-91113</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not surprised the Google isn&#039;t offering a free anti-virus solution, they get paid to distribute the software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not surprised the Google isn&#8217;t offering a free anti-virus solution, they get paid to distribute the software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-pack-gets-new-security-software-but-loses-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-91109</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/03/27/google-pack-gets-new-security-software-but-loses-firefox/#comment-91109</guid>
		<description>This is super weird...I just tried it in Opera and Internet Explorer 7 and both don&#039;t show Firefox! The only thing I can think of is that it is reading my operating system and only displaying Vista compatible software?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is super weird&#8230;I just tried it in Opera and Internet Explorer 7 and both don&#8217;t show Firefox! The only thing I can think of is that it is reading my operating system and only displaying Vista compatible software?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-pack-gets-new-security-software-but-loses-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-91106</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/03/27/google-pack-gets-new-security-software-but-loses-firefox/#comment-91106</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re not crazy, but maybe your browser is. :P

&lt;a href=&quot;http://sixpop.com/images/images/49759456.png&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re not crazy, but maybe your browser is. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>[<a href='http://sixpop.com/images/images/49759456.png' rel='nofollow'>sixpop.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-pack-gets-new-security-software-but-loses-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-91103</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/03/27/google-pack-gets-new-security-software-but-loses-firefox/#comment-91103</guid>
		<description>Okay, tell me that I&#039;m not crazy. This is a screenshot of what I see when pulling up the Google Pack:
http://tech.cybernetnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/GooglePackNoFirefox.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, tell me that I&#8217;m not crazy. This is a screenshot of what I see when pulling up the Google Pack:<br />
[<a href='http://tech.cybernetnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/GooglePackNoFirefox.jpg' rel='nofollow'>tech.cybernetnews.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thilak</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-pack-gets-new-security-software-but-loses-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-91100</link>
		<dc:creator>Thilak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/03/27/google-pack-gets-new-security-software-but-loses-firefox/#comment-91100</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Firefox shows up for me as well. I would really like to see Google include ClamWin with Packs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Firefox shows up for me as well. I would really like to see Google include ClamWin with Packs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-pack-gets-new-security-software-but-loses-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-91099</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/03/27/google-pack-gets-new-security-software-but-loses-firefox/#comment-91099</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[quote]*Norton Security Scan detects but does not remove spyware or adware.[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well that&#039;s kinda pointless, isn&#039;t it... 
By the way, I also see Firefox there still.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote]*Norton Security Scan detects but does not remove spyware or adware.[/quote]</p>
<p>Well that&#8217;s kinda pointless, isn&#8217;t it&#8230;<br />
By the way, I also see Firefox there still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
