<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Ready to Take on Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/google-ready-to-take-on-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-ready-to-take-on-twitter/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:45:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-ready-to-take-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-117603</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/09/google-ready-to-take-on-twitter/#comment-117603</guid>
		<description>Actually I think it makes sense that Google didn&#039;t buy Twitter. Jaiku has a lot more features than Twitter, and I think it presents less work for Google. Not only that but Google probably looked at the backend of things to see how easily it could be ported over. They know that whatever they do will become popular, and I&#039;m sure Twitter is worried now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I think it makes sense that Google didn&#8217;t buy Twitter. Jaiku has a lot more features than Twitter, and I think it presents less work for Google. Not only that but Google probably looked at the backend of things to see how easily it could be ported over. They know that whatever they do will become popular, and I&#8217;m sure Twitter is worried now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-ready-to-take-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-117590</link>
		<dc:creator>Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/09/google-ready-to-take-on-twitter/#comment-117590</guid>
		<description>I think you guys should start a new section. &quot;What Google bought......&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you guys should start a new section. &#8220;What Google bought&#8230;&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-ready-to-take-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-117586</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/09/google-ready-to-take-on-twitter/#comment-117586</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-117582&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Max wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I think they paid like $25 million for it. By the way, why didn’t Google just buy Twitter?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I was wondering the same thing because Twitter is more popular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-117582" rel="nofollow">Max wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I think they paid like $25 million for it. By the way, why didn’t Google just buy Twitter?</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I was wondering the same thing because Twitter is more popular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-ready-to-take-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-117582</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 18:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/09/google-ready-to-take-on-twitter/#comment-117582</guid>
		<description>I think they paid like $25 million for it. By the way, why didn&#039;t Google just buy Twitter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they paid like $25 million for it. By the way, why didn&#8217;t Google just buy Twitter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
