<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Google to Launch Gdrive Soon? I Think So!</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/google-to-launch-gdrive-soon-i-think-so/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-to-launch-gdrive-soon-i-think-so/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 02:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-to-launch-gdrive-soon-i-think-so/#comment-127304</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 20:29:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/27/google-to-launch-gdrive-soon-i-think-so/#comment-127304</guid> <description>From what I&#039;ve heard it will probably be shared space between all the Google products. So you could have let&#039;s say 5 GB space and you can use it for Picasa, Docs, mails, etc. Of course space slowly increasing (just like what Gmail does now)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I&#8217;ve heard it will probably be shared space between all the Google products. So you could have let&#8217;s say 5 GB space and you can use it for Picasa, Docs, mails, etc. Of course space slowly increasing (just like what Gmail does now)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-to-launch-gdrive-soon-i-think-so/#comment-126460</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 04:30:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/27/google-to-launch-gdrive-soon-i-think-so/#comment-126460</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-126394&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Helios wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;You could have stopped doing that a while ago, there are 3rd party applications that let you use your Gmail account as a drive. And yes all the folders and sub folders are kept intact when you download them to another computer. &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; We&#039;ve actually written an article before outlining those various tools available, but nothing would beat Google developing their own service that is well integrated.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-126394" rel="nofollow">Helios wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>You could have stopped doing that a while ago, there are 3rd party applications that let you use your Gmail account as a drive. And yes all the folders and sub folders are kept intact when you download them to another computer.</p></blockquote></div><p>We&#8217;ve actually written an article before outlining those various tools available, but nothing would beat Google developing their own service that is well integrated.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Helios</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-to-launch-gdrive-soon-i-think-so/#comment-126394</link> <dc:creator>Helios</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:47:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/27/google-to-launch-gdrive-soon-i-think-so/#comment-126394</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-124200&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ryan wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-124119&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nosh wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;What if they integrate it into our Gmail accounts and keep the 5GB cap or maybe increase it by a couple of gigs?  That way they give the Gdrive to everyone with a Gmail account with way less overhead. It’ll also make sense to have all our attachments easily accessible through a file manager.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;I hope it will have some kind of integration in Gmail. That way I could stop having to email files to myself.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;You could have stopped doing that a while ago, there are 3rd party applications that let you use your Gmail account as a drive. And yes all the folders and sub folders are kept intact when you download them to another computer.However there is the slight problem where your account may get suspended if you upload more than 400Mb at any one time, there are no issues/limits on downloading though which is good.Most of my files that I store online are pictures and media but the only way I would use an official &quot;G-Drive&quot; would be if I could use it as a normal drive. The problem I have will all of the online storage places like DivShare, MediaMax, AOL&#039;s X-Drive, Photobucket, is they all have these horrendously slow java applets that are geared towards &#039;mediacenter&#039; functions like photo albums. All I need is a place to dump files, don&#039;t care how pretty it is.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-124200" rel="nofollow">Ryan wrote:</a><br /><blockquote><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-124119" rel="nofollow">Nosh wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>What if they integrate it into our Gmail accounts and keep the 5GB cap or maybe increase it by a couple of gigs?  That way they give the Gdrive to everyone with a Gmail account with way less overhead. It’ll also make sense to have all our attachments easily accessible through a file manager.</p></blockquote></div><p>I hope it will have some kind of integration in Gmail. That way I could stop having to email files to myself.</p></blockquote></div><p>You could have stopped doing that a while ago, there are 3rd party applications that let you use your Gmail account as a drive. And yes all the folders and sub folders are kept intact when you download them to another computer.</p><p>However there is the slight problem where your account may get suspended if you upload more than 400Mb at any one time, there are no issues/limits on downloading though which is good.</p><p>Most of my files that I store online are pictures and media but the only way I would use an official &#8220;G-Drive&#8221; would be if I could use it as a normal drive. The problem I have will all of the online storage places like DivShare, MediaMax, AOL&#8217;s X-Drive, Photobucket, is they all have these horrendously slow java applets that are geared towards &#8216;mediacenter&#8217; functions like photo albums. All I need is a place to dump files, don&#8217;t care how pretty it is.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-to-launch-gdrive-soon-i-think-so/#comment-124200</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:02:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/27/google-to-launch-gdrive-soon-i-think-so/#comment-124200</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-124119&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nosh wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;What if they integrate it into our Gmail accounts and keep the 5GB cap or maybe increase it by a couple of gigs?  That way they give the Gdrive to everyone with a Gmail account with way less overhead. It’ll also make sense to have all our attachments easily accessible through a file manager.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; I hope it will have some kind of integration in Gmail. That way I could stop having to email files to myself.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-124119" rel="nofollow">Nosh wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>What if they integrate it into our Gmail accounts and keep the 5GB cap or maybe increase it by a couple of gigs?  That way they give the Gdrive to everyone with a Gmail account with way less overhead. It’ll also make sense to have all our attachments easily accessible through a file manager.</p></blockquote></div><p>I hope it will have some kind of integration in Gmail. That way I could stop having to email files to myself.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Google News Roundup &#124; Maun Tech</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-to-launch-gdrive-soon-i-think-so/#comment-124151</link> <dc:creator>Google News Roundup &#124; Maun Tech</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:32:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/27/google-to-launch-gdrive-soon-i-think-so/#comment-124151</guid> <description>[...] which will be an online storage system for your documents, files, photos, and more.&#160; See Cybernetnews on Google G-Drive and [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which will be an online storage system for your documents, files, photos, and more.&nbsp; See Cybernetnews on Google G-Drive and [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nosh</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-to-launch-gdrive-soon-i-think-so/#comment-124119</link> <dc:creator>Nosh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:23:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/27/google-to-launch-gdrive-soon-i-think-so/#comment-124119</guid> <description>What if they integrate it into our Gmail accounts and keep the 5GB cap or maybe increase it by a couple of gigs?  That way they give the Gdrive to everyone with a Gmail account with way less overhead. It&#039;ll also make sense to have all our attachments easily accessible through a file manager.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if they integrate it into our Gmail accounts and keep the 5GB cap or maybe increase it by a couple of gigs?  That way they give the Gdrive to everyone with a Gmail account with way less overhead. It&#8217;ll also make sense to have all our attachments easily accessible through a file manager.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ashley</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-to-launch-gdrive-soon-i-think-so/#comment-124079</link> <dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 02:49:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/27/google-to-launch-gdrive-soon-i-think-so/#comment-124079</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-123999&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Inferno_str1ke wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Comments about privacy here do amuse me - if you don’t want Google having access to your data here’s a clever idea - don’t f**king give it to them.I agree with the comment about DivShare though - at the end of the day whatever system they come up with will need to be as easy as using a USB drive if they want me to use it for regular data transfer. With a USB drive I can access my documents quickly, save them directly to the drive etc. Unless they come up with some sort of uber FTP software you won’t get the same quick portability.I would use it, but as backup rather than for transfer. The size doesn’t bother me - the fact that it’s there would be good enough.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; I agree that if you&#039;re worried about privacy, you shouldn&#039;t use it. It&#039;s just one of those topics that will always come up though.&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-124001&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Max wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Start off with 5 and increase it like Gmail is increasing. I think they should slow down the Gmail counter because people don’t really need 5GB for e-mail, but for files and documents, 5GB could be filled up quickly.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; 5GB does seem excessive for Gmail, so I think they could probably stop it all together.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-123999" rel="nofollow">Inferno_str1ke wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Comments about privacy here do amuse me &#8211; if you don’t want Google having access to your data here’s a clever idea &#8211; don’t f**king give it to them.</p><p>I agree with the comment about DivShare though &#8211; at the end of the day whatever system they come up with will need to be as easy as using a USB drive if they want me to use it for regular data transfer. With a USB drive I can access my documents quickly, save them directly to the drive etc. Unless they come up with some sort of uber FTP software you won’t get the same quick portability.</p><p>I would use it, but as backup rather than for transfer. The size doesn’t bother me &#8211; the fact that it’s there would be good enough.</p></blockquote></div><p>I agree that if you&#8217;re worried about privacy, you shouldn&#8217;t use it. It&#8217;s just one of those topics that will always come up though.<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-124001" rel="nofollow">Max wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Start off with 5 and increase it like Gmail is increasing. I think they should slow down the Gmail counter because people don’t really need 5GB for e-mail, but for files and documents, 5GB could be filled up quickly.</p></blockquote></div><p>5GB does seem excessive for Gmail, so I think they could probably stop it all together.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-to-launch-gdrive-soon-i-think-so/#comment-124078</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 02:47:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/27/google-to-launch-gdrive-soon-i-think-so/#comment-124078</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-123983&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;netster007x wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I don’t think any web interfaces let you upload and download a whole folder, with all it’s subfolders in tact.  That’s what I want to see.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; That would be really awesome, but I think they would have to create a software application to do that.&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-123999&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Inferno_str1ke wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I would use it, but as backup rather than for transfer. The size doesn’t bother me - the fact that it’s there would be good enough.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; That&#039;s all I would use it for as well. There are some things that I wouldn&#039;t mind having backed up at an offsite location, but I want something that is easier to use than any of the solutions currently available.&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-124001&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Max wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Start off with 5 and increase it like Gmail is increasing. I think they should slow down the Gmail counter because people don’t really need 5GB for e-mail, but for files and documents, 5GB could be filled up quickly.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; I agree, 5GB is a lot just for email. That&#039;s probably why they offer it though, because they are counting on people not actually using it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-123983" rel="nofollow">netster007x wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>I don’t think any web interfaces let you upload and download a whole folder, with all it’s subfolders in tact.  That’s what I want to see.</p></blockquote></div><p>That would be really awesome, but I think they would have to create a software application to do that.</p><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-123999" rel="nofollow">Inferno_str1ke wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>I would use it, but as backup rather than for transfer. The size doesn’t bother me &#8211; the fact that it’s there would be good enough.</p></blockquote></div><p>That&#8217;s all I would use it for as well. There are some things that I wouldn&#8217;t mind having backed up at an offsite location, but I want something that is easier to use than any of the solutions currently available.</p><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-124001" rel="nofollow">Max wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Start off with 5 and increase it like Gmail is increasing. I think they should slow down the Gmail counter because people don’t really need 5GB for e-mail, but for files and documents, 5GB could be filled up quickly.</p></blockquote></div><p>I agree, 5GB is a lot just for email. That&#8217;s probably why they offer it though, because they are counting on people not actually using it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DKong</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-to-launch-gdrive-soon-i-think-so/#comment-124077</link> <dc:creator>DKong</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 02:45:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/27/google-to-launch-gdrive-soon-i-think-so/#comment-124077</guid> <description>I think I&#039;d use this for storing mp3s and junk....but probably not much else. I already am giving google access to my calendar, email, and docs....so I don&#039;t want to dump ALL my stuff to them. :D</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;d use this for storing mp3s and junk&#8230;.but probably not much else. I already am giving google access to my calendar, email, and docs&#8230;.so I don&#8217;t want to dump ALL my stuff to them. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rumor Mill: GDrive to Launch Soon?</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-to-launch-gdrive-soon-i-think-so/#comment-124050</link> <dc:creator>Rumor Mill: GDrive to Launch Soon?</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:18:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/27/google-to-launch-gdrive-soon-i-think-so/#comment-124050</guid> <description>[...] Via CyberNet News [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via CyberNet News [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 302/323 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-27 00:21:59 -->
