<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Video Gets Frames &#8211; Focuses on Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/google-video-gets-frames-focuses-on-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-video-gets-frames-focuses-on-search/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:45:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-video-gets-frames-focuses-on-search/comment-page-1/#comment-98561</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/06/14/google-video-gets-frames-focuses-on-search/#comment-98561</guid>
		<description>If you go into the advanced video search options you actually can choose a specific domain to search, so you could do just google videos or even just youtube if you wanted. Just type in whatever domain you want.

I&#039;ve had mixed feelings about YouTube being in the results as well. While it is a better site, that doesn&#039;t necessarily mean that the content is better. Not only that, but the YouTube results normally take over the search results...there are very few Google video results when compared to the amount of YouTube ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you go into the advanced video search options you actually can choose a specific domain to search, so you could do just google videos or even just youtube if you wanted. Just type in whatever domain you want.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had mixed feelings about YouTube being in the results as well. While it is a better site, that doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean that the content is better. Not only that, but the YouTube results normally take over the search results&#8230;there are very few Google video results when compared to the amount of YouTube ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Killby</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/google-video-gets-frames-focuses-on-search/comment-page-1/#comment-98529</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Killby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/06/14/google-video-gets-frames-focuses-on-search/#comment-98529</guid>
		<description>I have mixed feelings about Google including other &quot;Video&quot; results such as YouTube into the video search. I haven&#039;t played around with it enough to find out if there&#039;s a way to only search in Google Video results rather than the entire internet, but I believe they should have the option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have mixed feelings about Google including other &#8220;Video&#8221; results such as YouTube into the video search. I haven&#8217;t played around with it enough to find out if there&#8217;s a way to only search in Google Video results rather than the entire internet, but I believe they should have the option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
