<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Helpful Tip: Remove Old Versions of Java (JRE)</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/helpful-tip-remove-old-versions-of-java-jre/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/helpful-tip-remove-old-versions-of-java-jre/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:40:50 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Transcontinental</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/helpful-tip-remove-old-versions-of-java-jre/#comment-144064</link> <dc:creator>Transcontinental</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:14:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14500#comment-144064</guid> <description>I&#039;m not really sure about this updater ... and as for the fact of updating itself (&#039;Additional Tasks&#039; =&gt; &#039;Update JavaRa&#039;), it downloads JavaRa version 1.10 whilst my installed version is latest 1.11. If it cannot update itself, am I entitled to believe it will perform better win Sun Java ?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not really sure about this updater &#8230; and as for the fact of updating itself (&#8216;Additional Tasks&#8217; =&gt; &#8216;Update JavaRa&#8217;), it downloads JavaRa version 1.10 whilst my installed version is latest 1.11. If it cannot update itself, am I entitled to believe it will perform better win Sun Java ?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/helpful-tip-remove-old-versions-of-java-jre/#comment-141931</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:15:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14500#comment-141931</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-141859&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;leland wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;There is actually a better reason than freeing up space to use this.  Carefully written code can call up a specific version of JRE and if it happens to be a version that is vulnerable then they may be able to get control of your computer.  This is the real reason to get rid of these old versions.  I have always uninstalled the old versions manually and never found a need for the older versions except one specific app that controls the postscript processor on our printer/copier at work.  Still I keep that 1.4 JRE up to date to stay secure.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Very true. I didn&#039;t even think about the vulnerability aspect, but that can be a big security problem for users.&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-141890&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Schwinn wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Excellent program. Even if you are removing only one version of JRE, it’s SO MUCH FASTER than the Add/Remove version of the uninstaller! Why on earth does the built in removal take so damn long?!&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; I always wondered why it was so slow as well. If you&#039;ve got multiple versions to remove this is definitely the way to go.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-141859" rel="nofollow">leland wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>There is actually a better reason than freeing up space to use this.  Carefully written code can call up a specific version of JRE and if it happens to be a version that is vulnerable then they may be able to get control of your computer.  This is the real reason to get rid of these old versions.  I have always uninstalled the old versions manually and never found a need for the older versions except one specific app that controls the postscript processor on our printer/copier at work.  Still I keep that 1.4 JRE up to date to stay secure.</p></blockquote></div><p>Very true. I didn&#8217;t even think about the vulnerability aspect, but that can be a big security problem for users.</p><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-141890" rel="nofollow">Schwinn wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Excellent program. Even if you are removing only one version of JRE, it’s SO MUCH FASTER than the Add/Remove version of the uninstaller! Why on earth does the built in removal take so damn long?!</p></blockquote></div><p>I always wondered why it was so slow as well. If you&#8217;ve got multiple versions to remove this is definitely the way to go.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sridhar Katakam</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/helpful-tip-remove-old-versions-of-java-jre/#comment-141901</link> <dc:creator>Sridhar Katakam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:47:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14500#comment-141901</guid> <description>@Schwinn: Try the free Zsoft uninstaller.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Schwinn: Try the free Zsoft uninstaller.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Schwinn</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/helpful-tip-remove-old-versions-of-java-jre/#comment-141890</link> <dc:creator>Schwinn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:44:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14500#comment-141890</guid> <description>Excellent program. Even if you are removing only one version of JRE, it&#039;s SO MUCH FASTER than the Add/Remove version of the uninstaller! Why on earth does the built in removal take so damn long?!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent program. Even if you are removing only one version of JRE, it&#8217;s SO MUCH FASTER than the Add/Remove version of the uninstaller! Why on earth does the built in removal take so damn long?!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Helpful Tip: Remove Old Versions of Java (JRE) - Tactical Gamer</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/helpful-tip-remove-old-versions-of-java-jre/#comment-141884</link> <dc:creator>Helpful Tip: Remove Old Versions of Java (JRE) - Tactical Gamer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 02:58:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14500#comment-141884</guid> <description>[...] want to give it a go, especially since you don&#039;t even have to install it. I ran it and all good.  Helpful Tip: Remove Old Versions of Java (JRE)   [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] want to give it a go, especially since you don&#8217;t even have to install it. I ran it and all good.  Helpful Tip: Remove Old Versions of Java (JRE)   [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Change</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/helpful-tip-remove-old-versions-of-java-jre/#comment-141867</link> <dc:creator>Change</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:25:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14500#comment-141867</guid> <description>Worked great for me, thanks! Always felt a little bothered with all those old Java folders on my system.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worked great for me, thanks! Always felt a little bothered with all those old Java folders on my system.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: leland</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/helpful-tip-remove-old-versions-of-java-jre/#comment-141859</link> <dc:creator>leland</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 02:59:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14500#comment-141859</guid> <description>There is actually a better reason than freeing up space to use this.  Carefully written code can call up a specific version of JRE and if it happens to be a version that is vulnerable then they may be able to get control of your computer.  This is the real reason to get rid of these old versions.  I have always uninstalled the old versions manually and never found a need for the older versions except one specific app that controls the postscript processor on our printer/copier at work.  Still I keep that 1.4 JRE up to date to stay secure.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is actually a better reason than freeing up space to use this.  Carefully written code can call up a specific version of JRE and if it happens to be a version that is vulnerable then they may be able to get control of your computer.  This is the real reason to get rid of these old versions.  I have always uninstalled the old versions manually and never found a need for the older versions except one specific app that controls the postscript processor on our printer/copier at work.  Still I keep that 1.4 JRE up to date to stay secure.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael Dobrofsky</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/helpful-tip-remove-old-versions-of-java-jre/#comment-141857</link> <dc:creator>Michael Dobrofsky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 00:13:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14500#comment-141857</guid> <description>Thanks, I&#039;ll try this out. Hate how companies leave this crap. They should have an *option* to remove.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I&#8217;ll try this out. Hate how companies leave this crap. They should have an *option* to remove.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Drake</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/helpful-tip-remove-old-versions-of-java-jre/#comment-141853</link> <dc:creator>Drake</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 22:56:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14500#comment-141853</guid> <description>I followed instructions, said all removed, rebooted, still there. Went to Revouninstaller, still there. Did a full remove of v6 updates 2,4,5,6 and left 7. Not sure why the other program didn&#039;t do the trick?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I followed instructions, said all removed, rebooted, still there. Went to Revouninstaller, still there. Did a full remove of v6 updates 2,4,5,6 and left 7. Not sure why the other program didn&#8217;t do the trick?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 281/300 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-02-13 10:33:47 -->
