Comments on: How has Google’s Feed Numbers Affected the Top Blogs? http://cybernetnews.com/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/ Technology News Sun, 27 May 2012 02:30:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Dario Salvelli’s Blog » Blog Archive » Rss Feed Subscriber Dancehttp://cybernetnews.com/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88955 Dario Salvelli’s Blog » Blog Archive » Rss Feed Subscriber Dance Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:48:24 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/17/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88955 [...] che può avvenire da 1 a 4 ore. CyberNet ha analizzato questa “feed dance” con un post ed ha calcolato qual è la percentuale di previsione dei lettori, determinabile mediante la [...] [...] che può avvenire da 1 a 4 ore. CyberNet ha analizzato questa “feed dance” con un post ed ha calcolato qual è la percentuale di previsione dei lettori, determinabile mediante la [...]

]]> By: Ryanhttp://cybernetnews.com/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88824 Ryan Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:34:46 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/17/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88824 Indeed they are! So I'm guessing Google is everyone's largest feed reader source. Indeed they are! So I’m guessing Google is everyone’s largest feed reader source.

]]> By: Ajayhttp://cybernetnews.com/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88813 Ajay Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:45:21 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/17/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88813 I had a 40% jump on http://ajaydsouza.com and 50% jump on http://techtites.comAtleast the numbers are more impressive now! I had a 40% jump on [ajaydsouza.com] and 50% jump on [techtites.com]

Atleast the numbers are more impressive now!

]]> By: Ryanhttp://cybernetnews.com/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88811 Ryan Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:17:45 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/17/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88811 <div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-88792">Allen Stern wrote:</a><blockquote>CenterNetworks (<a href="http://www.centernetworks.com" rel="nofollow">) had a 42% increase.</a>The only question I haven't seen answered is whether the count from Google will change daily based on whether a user actually "looks" at the feed.What we need is an active and a total rss feed subs number.</blockquote></div> I believe I read that Google is only reporting the number of subscribers, so the numbers may not accurately reflect how many "readers" you actually have.<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-88794">Tom Edwards wrote:</a><blockquote>And then they were gone: I'm back down to one and two Google subscribers on my respective feeds. Anyone know who's messing up?</blockquote></div> It's probably just because of the weekend. Feed subscribers always dip then so check back on Tuesday to see what your Monday numbers are like.<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-88798">Richard wrote:</a><blockquote>i only know techcrunch and i do not like, this is like everything, just fame, it doesnt meant they are the best or something.</blockquote></div> You're absolutely right, these numbers don't mean that you're the best by any means. Allen Stern wrote:
CenterNetworks ([centernetworks.com]

The only question I haven’t seen answered is whether the count from Google will change daily based on whether a user actually “looks” at the feed.

What we need is an active and a total rss feed subs number.

I believe I read that Google is only reporting the number of subscribers, so the numbers may not accurately reflect how many “readers” you actually have.

Tom Edwards wrote:
And then they were gone: I’m back down to one and two Google subscribers on my respective feeds. Anyone know who’s messing up?

It’s probably just because of the weekend. Feed subscribers always dip then so check back on Tuesday to see what your Monday numbers are like.

Richard wrote:
i only know techcrunch and i do not like, this is like everything, just fame, it doesnt meant they are the best or something.

You’re absolutely right, these numbers don’t mean that you’re the best by any means.

]]> By: Blog Mirrors » links for 2007-02-19http://cybernetnews.com/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88804 Blog Mirrors » links for 2007-02-19 Mon, 19 Feb 2007 05:13:06 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/17/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88804 [...] How has Google’s Feed Numbers Affected the Top Blogs? - CyberNet News My feed subscriber count rose 24% but Problogger is the big percentage winner - at least as far as we know. (tags: RSS Google FeedBurner Analytics) [...] [...] How has Google’s Feed Numbers Affected the Top Blogs? – CyberNet News My feed subscriber count rose 24% but Problogger is the big percentage winner – at least as far as we know. (tags: RSS Google FeedBurner Analytics) [...]

]]> By: Recent Feedburner Increases - Don’t Count Your Chickens Just Yet | Connected Internethttp://cybernetnews.com/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88803 Recent Feedburner Increases - Don’t Count Your Chickens Just Yet | Connected Internet Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:45:00 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/17/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88803 [...] you want to see some analysis of the big movers on ‘Feed Day’ then head on over to CyberNet Leave A Comment (0) | Trackback | Comments [...] [...] you want to see some analysis of the big movers on ‘Feed Day’ then head on over to CyberNet Leave A Comment (0) | Trackback | Comments [...]

]]> By: Richardhttp://cybernetnews.com/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88798 Richard Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:12:11 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/17/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88798 i only know techcrunch and i do not like, this is like everything, just fame, it doesnt meant they are the best or something. i only know techcrunch and i do not like, this is like everything, just fame, it doesnt meant they are the best or something.

]]> By: Tom Edwardshttp://cybernetnews.com/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88794 Tom Edwards Sun, 18 Feb 2007 09:31:14 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/17/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88794 And then they were gone: I'm back down to one and two Google subscribers on my respective feeds. Anyone know who's messing up? And then they were gone: I’m back down to one and two Google subscribers on my respective feeds. Anyone know who’s messing up?

]]> By: Allen Sternhttp://cybernetnews.com/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88792 Allen Stern Sun, 18 Feb 2007 03:10:32 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/17/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88792 CenterNetworks (<a href="http://www.centernetworks.com" rel="nofollow">) had a 42% increase.</a>The only question I haven't seen answered is whether the count from Google will change daily based on whether a user actually "looks" at the feed.What we need is an active and a total rss feed subs number. CenterNetworks ([centernetworks.com]

The only question I haven’t seen answered is whether the count from Google will change daily based on whether a user actually “looks” at the feed.

What we need is an active and a total rss feed subs number.

]]> By: Ryanhttp://cybernetnews.com/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88791 Ryan Sun, 18 Feb 2007 03:06:34 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/17/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88791 <div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-88789">Fx Extension Guru wrote:</a><blockquote><p>Something is a fishy...I had a 55% increase yesterday going from 31 to 49 subscribers. This is not logical, it was not like I had a big surge of traffic on my blog yesterday. :evil:</p> <p><a href="http://i104.photobucket.com/albums/m195/ffextensionguru/Blog/feedstats.png" rel="nofollow">http://i104.photobucket.com/albums/m195/ffextensionguru/Blog/feedstats.png</a></p></blockquote></div> Yep, Chris is right. Your subscriber count went up because of the "Google Feedfetcher" addition to the pie chart. Before these numbers weren't reported.I am happy to see that Google has had a similar impact on the other blogs out there. In fact, I would almost say that Google probably has the largest share of readers on most blogs (compared to other services like Bloglines) which was something a lot of people were wondering. I guess everyone likes the new Google Reader. ;) Fx Extension Guru wrote:

Something is a fishy…I had a 55% increase yesterday going from 31 to 49 subscribers. This is not logical, it was not like I had a big surge of traffic on my blog yesterday. :evil:

[i104.photobucket.com]

Yep, Chris is right. Your subscriber count went up because of the “Google Feedfetcher” addition to the pie chart. Before these numbers weren’t reported.

I am happy to see that Google has had a similar impact on the other blogs out there. In fact, I would almost say that Google probably has the largest share of readers on most blogs (compared to other services like Bloglines) which was something a lot of people were wondering. I guess everyone likes the new Google Reader. ;)

]]>