<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How has Google&#8217;s Feed Numbers Affected the Top Blogs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:53:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dario Salvelli&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rss Feed Subscriber Dance</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-88955</link>
		<dc:creator>Dario Salvelli&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rss Feed Subscriber Dance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/17/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88955</guid>
		<description>[...] che puÃ² avvenire da 1 a 4 ore. CyberNet ha analizzato questa &#8220;feed dance&#8221; con un post ed ha calcolato qual Ã¨ la percentuale di previsione dei lettori, determinabile mediante la [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] che puÃ² avvenire da 1 a 4 ore. CyberNet ha analizzato questa &#8220;feed dance&#8221; con un post ed ha calcolato qual Ã¨ la percentuale di previsione dei lettori, determinabile mediante la [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-88824</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/17/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88824</guid>
		<description>Indeed they are! So I&#039;m guessing Google is everyone&#039;s largest feed reader source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed they are! So I&#8217;m guessing Google is everyone&#8217;s largest feed reader source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajay</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-88813</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/17/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88813</guid>
		<description>I had a 40% jump on http://ajaydsouza.com and 50% jump on http://techtites.com

Atleast the numbers are more impressive now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a 40% jump on [<a href='http://ajaydsouza.com' rel='nofollow'>ajaydsouza.com</a>] and 50% jump on [<a href='http://techtites.com' rel='nofollow'>techtites.com</a>]</p>
<p>Atleast the numbers are more impressive now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-88811</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/17/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88811</guid>
		<description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-88792&quot;&gt;Allen Stern wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;CenterNetworks (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.centernetworks.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;) had a 42% increase.&lt;/a&gt;

The only question I haven&#039;t seen answered is whether the count from Google will change daily based on whether a user actually &quot;looks&quot; at the feed.

What we need is an active and a total rss feed subs number.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I believe I read that Google is only reporting the number of subscribers, so the numbers may not accurately reflect how many &quot;readers&quot; you actually have.

&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-88794&quot;&gt;Tom Edwards wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;And then they were gone: I&#039;m back down to one and two Google subscribers on my respective feeds. Anyone know who&#039;s messing up?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
It&#039;s probably just because of the weekend. Feed subscribers always dip then so check back on Tuesday to see what your Monday numbers are like.

&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-88798&quot;&gt;Richard wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;i only know techcrunch and i do not like, this is like everything, just fame, it doesnt meant they are the best or something.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
You&#039;re absolutely right, these numbers don&#039;t mean that you&#039;re the best by any means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-88792">Allen Stern wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>CenterNetworks ([<a href='http://www.centernetworks.com' rel='nofollow'>centernetworks.com</a>]</p>
<p>The only question I haven&#8217;t seen answered is whether the count from Google will change daily based on whether a user actually &#8220;looks&#8221; at the feed.</p>
<p>What we need is an active and a total rss feed subs number.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I believe I read that Google is only reporting the number of subscribers, so the numbers may not accurately reflect how many &#8220;readers&#8221; you actually have.</p>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-88794">Tom Edwards wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>And then they were gone: I&#8217;m back down to one and two Google subscribers on my respective feeds. Anyone know who&#8217;s messing up?</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>It&#8217;s probably just because of the weekend. Feed subscribers always dip then so check back on Tuesday to see what your Monday numbers are like.</p>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-88798">Richard wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>i only know techcrunch and i do not like, this is like everything, just fame, it doesnt meant they are the best or something.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right, these numbers don&#8217;t mean that you&#8217;re the best by any means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Mirrors &#187; links for 2007-02-19</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-88804</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Mirrors &#187; links for 2007-02-19</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 05:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/17/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88804</guid>
		<description>[...] How has Googleâ€™s Feed Numbers Affected the Top Blogs? - CyberNet News My feed subscriber count rose 24% but Problogger is the big percentage winner - at least as far as we know. (tags: RSS Google FeedBurner Analytics) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How has Googleâ€™s Feed Numbers Affected the Top Blogs? &#8211; CyberNet News My feed subscriber count rose 24% but Problogger is the big percentage winner &#8211; at least as far as we know. (tags: RSS Google FeedBurner Analytics) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recent Feedburner Increases - Don&#8217;t Count Your Chickens Just Yet &#124; Connected Internet</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-88803</link>
		<dc:creator>Recent Feedburner Increases - Don&#8217;t Count Your Chickens Just Yet &#124; Connected Internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/17/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88803</guid>
		<description>[...] you want to see some analysis of the big movers on &#8216;Feed Day&#8217; then head on over to CyberNet          Leave A Comment (0) &#124; Trackback &#124; Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you want to see some analysis of the big movers on &#8216;Feed Day&#8217; then head on over to CyberNet          Leave A Comment (0) | Trackback | Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-88798</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/17/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88798</guid>
		<description>i only know techcrunch and i do not like, this is like everything, just fame, it doesnt meant they are the best or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i only know techcrunch and i do not like, this is like everything, just fame, it doesnt meant they are the best or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Edwards</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-88794</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 09:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/17/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88794</guid>
		<description>And then they were gone: I&#039;m back down to one and two Google subscribers on my respective feeds. Anyone know who&#039;s messing up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And then they were gone: I&#8217;m back down to one and two Google subscribers on my respective feeds. Anyone know who&#8217;s messing up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Stern</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-88792</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Stern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 03:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/17/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88792</guid>
		<description>CenterNetworks (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.centernetworks.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;) had a 42% increase.&lt;/a&gt;

The only question I haven&#039;t seen answered is whether the count from Google will change daily based on whether a user actually &quot;looks&quot; at the feed.

What we need is an active and a total rss feed subs number.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CenterNetworks ([<a href='http://www.centernetworks.com' rel='nofollow'>centernetworks.com</a>]</p>
<p>The only question I haven&#8217;t seen answered is whether the count from Google will change daily based on whether a user actually &#8220;looks&#8221; at the feed.</p>
<p>What we need is an active and a total rss feed subs number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-88791</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 03:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/02/17/how-has-googles-feed-numbers-affected-the-top-blogs/#comment-88791</guid>
		<description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-88789&quot;&gt;Fx Extension Guru wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Something is a fishy...I had a 55% increase yesterday going from 31 to 49 subscribers.  This is not logical, it was not like I had a big surge of traffic on my blog yesterday. :evil:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://i104.photobucket.com/albums/m195/ffextensionguru/Blog/feedstats.png&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://i104.photobucket.com/albums/m195/ffextensionguru/Blog/feedstats.png&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Yep, Chris is right. Your subscriber count went up because of the &quot;Google Feedfetcher&quot; addition to the pie chart. Before these numbers weren&#039;t reported.

I am happy to see that Google has had a similar impact on the other blogs out there. In fact, I would almost say that Google probably has the largest share of readers on most blogs (compared to other services like Bloglines) which was something a lot of people were wondering. I guess everyone likes the new Google Reader. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-88789">Fx Extension Guru wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>
<p>Something is a fishy&#8230;I had a 55% increase yesterday going from 31 to 49 subscribers.  This is not logical, it was not like I had a big surge of traffic on my blog yesterday. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_evil.gif' alt=':evil:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>[<a href='http://i104.photobucket.com/albums/m195/ffextensionguru/Blog/feedstats.png' rel='nofollow'>i104.photobucket.com</a>]</p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p>Yep, Chris is right. Your subscriber count went up because of the &#8220;Google Feedfetcher&#8221; addition to the pie chart. Before these numbers weren&#8217;t reported.</p>
<p>I am happy to see that Google has had a similar impact on the other blogs out there. In fact, I would almost say that Google probably has the largest share of readers on most blogs (compared to other services like Bloglines) which was something a lot of people were wondering. I guess everyone likes the new Google Reader. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
