<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: IBM Roadrunner Supercomputer Shatters Record</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/ibm-roadrunner-supercomputer-shatters-record/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/ibm-roadrunner-supercomputer-shatters-record/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:03:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/ibm-roadrunner-supercomputer-shatters-record/#comment-153383</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:21:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13009#comment-153383</guid> <description>Scientists always find new discoveries in things people question at first.Who knows, maybe they&#039;ll find more proof towards the big bang. Maybe they&#039;ll find new forms of matter. There is a lot going on during a nuclear explosion and they want to know what all of it is.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scientists always find new discoveries in things people question at first.</p><p>Who knows, maybe they&#8217;ll find more proof towards the big bang. Maybe they&#8217;ll find new forms of matter. There is a lot going on during a nuclear explosion and they want to know what all of it is.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vic</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/ibm-roadrunner-supercomputer-shatters-record/#comment-146949</link> <dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:43:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13009#comment-146949</guid> <description>Wow! A 133M dollar powerful machine! So powerful. I want to have it in my business operation. But oh, my business is just worth a 1,000 dollar. LOL. But can they create that so powerful machine as a movable portable object like a laptop? Lol</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! A 133M dollar powerful machine! So powerful. I want to have it in my business operation. But oh, my business is just worth a 1,000 dollar. LOL. But can they create that so powerful machine as a movable portable object like a laptop? Lol</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/ibm-roadrunner-supercomputer-shatters-record/#comment-139060</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:01:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13009#comment-139060</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-139015&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Alexandre wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I’m not concerned about numbers. I’m talking about CPUs like used in PS3 and nightly “classified” LAN partys… This would be wonderful! :P&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Ahh, gotcha! That would make for a good LAN party. ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-139015" rel="nofollow">Alexandre wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>I’m not concerned about numbers. I’m talking about CPUs like used in PS3 and nightly “classified” LAN partys… This would be wonderful!<br /> <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /></p></blockquote></div><p>Ahh, gotcha! That would make for a good LAN party. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alexandre</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/ibm-roadrunner-supercomputer-shatters-record/#comment-139015</link> <dc:creator>Alexandre</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 20:25:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13009#comment-139015</guid> <description>I&#039;m not concerned about numbers. I&#039;m talking about CPUs like used in PS3 and nightly “classified” LAN partys... This would be wonderful! :P</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not concerned about numbers. I&#8217;m talking about CPUs like used in PS3 and nightly “classified” LAN partys&#8230; This would be wonderful!<br /> <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/ibm-roadrunner-supercomputer-shatters-record/#comment-138997</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:59:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13009#comment-138997</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-138975&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Alexandre wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Hi Ryan!You forgot to mention the “12,960 ‘improved’ Cell processors (yes, like those powering your PS3)” according to Engadget: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/09/worlds-fastest-ibms-roadrunner-supercomputer-breaks-petaflop/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.engadget.com/2008/0.....-petaflop/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; That would be the 6,480 dual-core Opterons that I mentioned. Engadget just counted each core individually, which equals the 12,960 figure they came up with.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-138975" rel="nofollow">Alexandre wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Hi Ryan!</p><p>You forgot to mention the “12,960 ‘improved’ Cell processors (yes, like those powering your PS3)” according to Engadget: [<a href='http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/09/worlds-fastest-ibms-roadrunner-supercomputer-breaks-petaflop/' rel='nofollow'>engadget.com</a>]</p></blockquote></div><p>That would be the 6,480 dual-core Opterons that I mentioned. Engadget just counted each core individually, which equals the 12,960 figure they came up with.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alexandre</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/ibm-roadrunner-supercomputer-shatters-record/#comment-138975</link> <dc:creator>Alexandre</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 06:16:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13009#comment-138975</guid> <description>Hi Ryan!You forgot to mention the &quot;12,960 &#039;improved&#039; Cell processors (yes, like those powering your PS3)&quot; according to Engadget: http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/09/worlds-fastest-ibms-roadrunner-supercomputer-breaks-petaflop/:!:</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ryan!</p><p>You forgot to mention the &#8220;12,960 &#8216;improved&#8217; Cell processors (yes, like those powering your PS3)&#8221; according to Engadget: [<a href='http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/09/worlds-fastest-ibms-roadrunner-supercomputer-breaks-petaflop/' rel='nofollow'>engadget.com</a>]</p><p> <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_exclaim.gif' alt=':!:' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/ibm-roadrunner-supercomputer-shatters-record/#comment-138962</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 02:25:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13009#comment-138962</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-138943&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;StationStops.com wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Seriously, WTF is so interesting about the first few moments of a nuclear detonation that we need to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on this stuff?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; It&#039;s going to be used for other stuff too they said, but that was just one of the main highlights. My guess is that by simulating the early part of the nuclear explosion they&#039;ll be able to determine the radius it will cover.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-138943" rel="nofollow">StationStops.com wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Seriously, WTF is so interesting about the first few moments of a nuclear detonation that we need to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on this stuff?</p></blockquote></div><p>It&#8217;s going to be used for other stuff too they said, but that was just one of the main highlights. My guess is that by simulating the early part of the nuclear explosion they&#8217;ll be able to determine the radius it will cover.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: StationStops.com</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/ibm-roadrunner-supercomputer-shatters-record/#comment-138943</link> <dc:creator>StationStops.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 21:34:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13009#comment-138943</guid> <description>Supercomputers are cool, but...Its disgusting how much money we have to spend just in *computing* power to support nuclear weapons.Seriously, WTF is so interesting about the first few moments of a nuclear detonation that we need to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on this stuff?Oh and of course these computers not only compute, but depreciate, at the speed of light.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supercomputers are cool, but&#8230;</p><p>Its disgusting how much money we have to spend just in *computing* power to support nuclear weapons.</p><p>Seriously, WTF is so interesting about the first few moments of a nuclear detonation that we need to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on this stuff?</p><p>Oh and of course these computers not only compute, but depreciate, at the speed of light.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 286/305 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-02-13 06:31:54 -->
