Comments on: Incompatible Vista SP1 Programs http://cybernetnews.com/incompatible-vista-sp1-programs/ Technology News Sun, 27 May 2012 02:30:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Ryanhttp://cybernetnews.com/incompatible-vista-sp1-programs/#comment-131719 Ryan Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:13:51 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/19/incompatible-vista-sp1-programs/#comment-131719 <div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-131671" rel="nofollow">Jidery wrote:</a><blockquote>Why did this happen?What did they change that would effect .exe?</blockquote></div> There's a lot of under-the-hood stuff that could affect these applications running, but I'm guessing it was some tweaks to the UAC/security settings that prevent the security related apps from running. Jidery wrote:
Why did this happen?

What did they change that would effect .exe?

There’s a lot of under-the-hood stuff that could affect these applications running, but I’m guessing it was some tweaks to the UAC/security settings that prevent the security related apps from running.

]]> By: FearZiphttp://cybernetnews.com/incompatible-vista-sp1-programs/#comment-131703 FearZip Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:01:52 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/19/incompatible-vista-sp1-programs/#comment-131703 It is not strange if they changed things in the kernel. If now don't appear more incompatible programs would be a surprise. It is not strange if they changed things in the kernel. If now don’t appear more incompatible programs would be a surprise.

]]> By: pacifikahttp://cybernetnews.com/incompatible-vista-sp1-programs/#comment-131702 pacifika Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:42:48 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/19/incompatible-vista-sp1-programs/#comment-131702 Seems its security related they're all antivirus / firewall software. Seems its security related they’re all antivirus / firewall software.

]]> By: Jideryhttp://cybernetnews.com/incompatible-vista-sp1-programs/#comment-131671 Jidery Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:25:41 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/19/incompatible-vista-sp1-programs/#comment-131671 Why did this happen?What did they change that would effect .exe? Why did this happen?

What did they change that would effect .exe?

]]>