<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel&#8217;s Core 2 Duo Pushing AMD into the Red?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/intels-core-2-duo-pushing-amd-into-the-red/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/intels-core-2-duo-pushing-amd-into-the-red/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:45:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/intels-core-2-duo-pushing-amd-into-the-red/comment-page-1/#comment-94636</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/20/intes-core-2-duo-pushing-amd-into-the-red/#comment-94636</guid>
		<description>AMD really has some high quality processors, and while I&#039;m currently running mostly Intel processors on my PC&#039;s (I do have a computer with an X2 5000 though) I am confident that AMD will do something to revolutionize the market. They have been keeping quite a little too long and so I think they have a trick up their sleeve. 

I&#039;m sure it will somehow integrate their recent ATI acquisition? Maybe an all-in-one processor that also has a video card actually on the processor? If they figure out how to do that then that could really shrink and lighten mobile computers while offering fast graphical computations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMD really has some high quality processors, and while I&#8217;m currently running mostly Intel processors on my PC&#8217;s (I do have a computer with an X2 5000 though) I am confident that AMD will do something to revolutionize the market. They have been keeping quite a little too long and so I think they have a trick up their sleeve. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure it will somehow integrate their recent ATI acquisition? Maybe an all-in-one processor that also has a video card actually on the processor? If they figure out how to do that then that could really shrink and lighten mobile computers while offering fast graphical computations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hAiRiL</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/intels-core-2-duo-pushing-amd-into-the-red/comment-page-1/#comment-94591</link>
		<dc:creator>hAiRiL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 00:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/20/intes-core-2-duo-pushing-amd-into-the-red/#comment-94591</guid>
		<description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-94577&quot;&gt;CoryC wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;AMD has always been slow to get the jump on Intel but once they do they usually enjoy the lead for a couple of years.

It takes time and lots of money to create a great processor so while Intel enjoys top honors today it won&#039;t last forever.  I believe within a year AMD will be back on top with true quad-code and 8-core processors build on 45 NM technology.  This will put AMD at the top again.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

Yea, I agree with CoryC. It took me quite some time to switch from the infamous P4 478pin to AMD64x2 AM2, but the wait was worth it. Even at times the Core 2 Duo seems tempting :D But the major turn off for me is that Intel chips runs hot even @ idle, and the stock fan buzzes like mad.

Oh AMD will be back, thats for sure. Watch out, C2D  :twisted:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-94577">CoryC wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>AMD has always been slow to get the jump on Intel but once they do they usually enjoy the lead for a couple of years.</p>
<p>It takes time and lots of money to create a great processor so while Intel enjoys top honors today it won&#8217;t last forever.  I believe within a year AMD will be back on top with true quad-code and 8-core processors build on 45 NM technology.  This will put AMD at the top again.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Yea, I agree with CoryC. It took me quite some time to switch from the infamous P4 478pin to AMD64&#215;2 AM2, but the wait was worth it. Even at times the Core 2 Duo seems tempting <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  But the major turn off for me is that Intel chips runs hot even @ idle, and the stock fan buzzes like mad.</p>
<p>Oh AMD will be back, thats for sure. Watch out, C2D  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif' alt=':twisted:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr.defeatable</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/intels-core-2-duo-pushing-amd-into-the-red/comment-page-1/#comment-94587</link>
		<dc:creator>mr.defeatable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 23:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/20/intes-core-2-duo-pushing-amd-into-the-red/#comment-94587</guid>
		<description>I also am an AMD fan and am looking forward to their future processors the X4 and X8 I believe.  Another reason AMD tends to lag behind from time to time is that they do a lot more testing internally before releasing products than what Intel does.  If memory recalls they tested the original 64bit cores for more than 3 years before releasing them.  I personally would rather have a proc that has gone through good R&amp;D as well as testing before release.  I remember the early PIII problems.

I will openly admit I am biased and have been called an AMD fanboy so take it as you will</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also am an AMD fan and am looking forward to their future processors the X4 and X8 I believe.  Another reason AMD tends to lag behind from time to time is that they do a lot more testing internally before releasing products than what Intel does.  If memory recalls they tested the original 64bit cores for more than 3 years before releasing them.  I personally would rather have a proc that has gone through good R&amp;D as well as testing before release.  I remember the early PIII problems.</p>
<p>I will openly admit I am biased and have been called an AMD fanboy so take it as you will</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoryC</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/intels-core-2-duo-pushing-amd-into-the-red/comment-page-1/#comment-94577</link>
		<dc:creator>CoryC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/20/intes-core-2-duo-pushing-amd-into-the-red/#comment-94577</guid>
		<description>AMD has always been slow to get the jump on Intel but once they do they usually enjoy the lead for a couple of years.

It takes time and lots of money to create a great processor so while Intel enjoys top honors today it won&#039;t last forever.  I believe within a year AMD will be back on top with true quad-code and 8-core processors build on 45 NM technology.  This will put AMD at the top again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMD has always been slow to get the jump on Intel but once they do they usually enjoy the lead for a couple of years.</p>
<p>It takes time and lots of money to create a great processor so while Intel enjoys top honors today it won&#8217;t last forever.  I believe within a year AMD will be back on top with true quad-code and 8-core processors build on 45 NM technology.  This will put AMD at the top again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
