<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet Explorer 7 Release About The Same As Firefox 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:45:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/comment-page-1/#comment-27000</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 05:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/08/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-27000</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure about your Internet Explorer problem because I have only heard about that happening with Firefox.

To download Firefox 2 I don&#039;t believe you will receive an update. Firefox 2 will be the first version that has the &quot;major update&quot; system available which will let you upgrade from previous versions. As far as I know this is not the same as the update system that is in Firefox 1.5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure about your Internet Explorer problem because I have only heard about that happening with Firefox.</p>
<p>To download Firefox 2 I don&#8217;t believe you will receive an update. Firefox 2 will be the first version that has the &#8220;major update&#8221; system available which will let you upgrade from previous versions. As far as I know this is not the same as the update system that is in Firefox 1.5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suuuushi</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/comment-page-1/#comment-26994</link>
		<dc:creator>Suuuushi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 05:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/08/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26994</guid>
		<description>Do you know how the Firefox 2 will be availible?  :oops:   
Will you get an automatic update, or do you have to go to the Mozilla firefox main page for more infomation?   :roll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know how the Firefox 2 will be availible?  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_redface.gif' alt=':oops:' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Will you get an automatic update, or do you have to go to the Mozilla firefox main page for more infomation?   <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif' alt=':roll:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suuuushi</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/comment-page-1/#comment-26992</link>
		<dc:creator>Suuuushi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 05:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/08/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26992</guid>
		<description>Some websites I visit on Mozilla Firefox work fine however, when I use Internet Explorer it says either the program is allready running. I have downloaded and installed it completely, and i prefer using IE better, because of tabs, and it&#039;s content.  8O

Please, I really need and answer.  :mrgreen:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some websites I visit on Mozilla Firefox work fine however, when I use Internet Explorer it says either the program is allready running. I have downloaded and installed it completely, and i prefer using IE better, because of tabs, and it&#8217;s content.  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_eek.gif' alt='8O' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Please, I really need and answer.  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif' alt=':mrgreen:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox Memory Issues A Thing of The Past? &#171; Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/comment-page-1/#comment-26123</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox Memory Issues A Thing of The Past? &#171; Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/08/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26123</guid>
		<description>[...] A brief discussion regarding Firefox memory issues came about on CyberNet News in regards to the Internet Explorer 7 Release About The Same As Firefox 2 article.Â  One of the comments left by &#8216;Dave&#8217;: &#8220;In my opinion, we could see quite a few people move from Firefox to IE7. In the pre Firefox 1.5 days, there was this huge Firefox movement. But during the 1.5 builds, Iâ€™ve seen tons of people grow tired of the memory leaks and other bugs associated with Firefox such as the copy/paste bug.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A brief discussion regarding Firefox memory issues came about on CyberNet News in regards to the Internet Explorer 7 Release About The Same As Firefox 2 article.Â  One of the comments left by &#8216;Dave&#8217;: &#8220;In my opinion, we could see quite a few people move from Firefox to IE7. In the pre Firefox 1.5 days, there was this huge Firefox movement. But during the 1.5 builds, Iâ€™ve seen tons of people grow tired of the memory leaks and other bugs associated with Firefox such as the copy/paste bug.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SLA</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/comment-page-1/#comment-26077</link>
		<dc:creator>SLA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 10:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/08/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26077</guid>
		<description>IE7 is still FULL OF BUGS, and there is many software products (using embedded IE) which doesn&#039;t work well with IE7.
While Firefox 2 RC2 is, imho, production quality. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IE7 is still FULL OF BUGS, and there is many software products (using embedded IE) which doesn&#8217;t work well with IE7.<br />
While Firefox 2 RC2 is, imho, production quality. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/comment-page-1/#comment-26051</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/08/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26051</guid>
		<description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-26049&quot;&gt;ffextensionguru wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Just did a quick check and noticed Flock wiht 1 tab open is using 76MB while Firefox 2 with 3 tabs is only using 50 MB!&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Flock is still based off of Firefox 1.5.* so I am sure it will still have some memory leaks. In fact there are a few memory leaks that Flock introduced themselves which has been one of the biggest complaints. To my knowledge they have not fixed them yet.

There have been a lot of extensions getting updated which is great to see. I am sure anything helps to reduce the cause of memory leaks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-26049">ffextensionguru wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Just did a quick check and noticed Flock wiht 1 tab open is using 76MB while Firefox 2 with 3 tabs is only using 50 MB!</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Flock is still based off of Firefox 1.5.* so I am sure it will still have some memory leaks. In fact there are a few memory leaks that Flock introduced themselves which has been one of the biggest complaints. To my knowledge they have not fixed them yet.</p>
<p>There have been a lot of extensions getting updated which is great to see. I am sure anything helps to reduce the cause of memory leaks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ffextensionguru</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/comment-page-1/#comment-26050</link>
		<dc:creator>ffextensionguru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/08/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26050</guid>
		<description>Further, I noticed a huge reduction in the past couple weeks (right after RC1) which was about the time there was huge surge in extension updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further, I noticed a huge reduction in the past couple weeks (right after RC1) which was about the time there was huge surge in extension updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ffextensionguru</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/comment-page-1/#comment-26049</link>
		<dc:creator>ffextensionguru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/08/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26049</guid>
		<description>Just did a quick check and noticed Flock wiht 1 tab open is using 76MB while Firefox 2 with 3 tabs is only using 50 MB!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just did a quick check and noticed Flock wiht 1 tab open is using 76MB while Firefox 2 with 3 tabs is only using 50 MB!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/comment-page-1/#comment-26047</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/08/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26047</guid>
		<description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-26018&quot;&gt;ffextensionguru wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;In my opinion, we could see quite a few people move from Firefox to IE7. In the pre Firefox 1.5 days, there was this huge Firefox movement. But during the 1.5 builds, Iâ€™ve seen tons of people grow tired of the memory leaks and other bugs associated with Firefox such as the copy/paste bug.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, that is a negative stigma Firefox is going to have to change since these issues have been addressed and corrected in Firefox 2.  I been using Firefox 2 as well now as my primary browser and have seen a huge difference in performance and the memory leaks seem to have been plugged now as well.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I agree, memory leaks now seem to be a thing of the past for me. Running Firefox on Windows Vista for two days straight without restarting and I&#039;m at 125MB. It is still a little high because Opera hangs around 70MB but I never get up into the 300-400MB range anymore. Thank goodness!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-26018">ffextensionguru wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>
<blockquote>In my opinion, we could see quite a few people move from Firefox to IE7. In the pre Firefox 1.5 days, there was this huge Firefox movement. But during the 1.5 builds, Iâ€™ve seen tons of people grow tired of the memory leaks and other bugs associated with Firefox such as the copy/paste bug.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, that is a negative stigma Firefox is going to have to change since these issues have been addressed and corrected in Firefox 2.  I been using Firefox 2 as well now as my primary browser and have seen a huge difference in performance and the memory leaks seem to have been plugged now as well.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I agree, memory leaks now seem to be a thing of the past for me. Running Firefox on Windows Vista for two days straight without restarting and I&#8217;m at 125MB. It is still a little high because Opera hangs around 70MB but I never get up into the 300-400MB range anymore. Thank goodness!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldManDeath</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/comment-page-1/#comment-26036</link>
		<dc:creator>OldManDeath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 01:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/08/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26036</guid>
		<description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-26021&quot;&gt;fabiopsousa wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;In this moment well... i&#039;m pretty happy with FF 1.5 (0.7) and i ll eventually upgade to 2.0 when first update be realeased.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;I too was going to wait, however, I took the plunge to v2 RC2 and am glad that I did.  I really like the changes and it has run flawlessly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-26021">fabiopsousa wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>In this moment well&#8230; i&#8217;m pretty happy with FF 1.5 (0.7) and i ll eventually upgade to 2.0 when first update be realeased.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I too was going to wait, however, I took the plunge to v2 RC2 and am glad that I did.  I really like the changes and it has run flawlessly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
