<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Internet Explorer 7 Release About The Same As Firefox 2</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 02:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-27000</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 05:10:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/08/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-27000</guid> <description>I&#039;m not sure about your Internet Explorer problem because I have only heard about that happening with Firefox.To download Firefox 2 I don&#039;t believe you will receive an update. Firefox 2 will be the first version that has the &quot;major update&quot; system available which will let you upgrade from previous versions. As far as I know this is not the same as the update system that is in Firefox 1.5</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure about your Internet Explorer problem because I have only heard about that happening with Firefox.</p><p>To download Firefox 2 I don&#8217;t believe you will receive an update. Firefox 2 will be the first version that has the &#8220;major update&#8221; system available which will let you upgrade from previous versions. As far as I know this is not the same as the update system that is in Firefox 1.5</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Suuuushi</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26994</link> <dc:creator>Suuuushi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 05:03:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/08/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26994</guid> <description>Do you know how the Firefox 2 will be availible?  :oops: Will you get an automatic update, or do you have to go to the Mozilla firefox main page for more infomation?   :roll:</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know how the Firefox 2 will be availible? <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_redface.gif' alt=':oops:' class='wp-smiley' /><br /> Will you get an automatic update, or do you have to go to the Mozilla firefox main page for more infomation? <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif' alt=':roll:' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Suuuushi</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26992</link> <dc:creator>Suuuushi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 05:00:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/08/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26992</guid> <description>Some websites I visit on Mozilla Firefox work fine however, when I use Internet Explorer it says either the program is allready running. I have downloaded and installed it completely, and i prefer using IE better, because of tabs, and it&#039;s content.  8OPlease, I really need and answer.  :mrgreen:</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some websites I visit on Mozilla Firefox work fine however, when I use Internet Explorer it says either the program is allready running. I have downloaded and installed it completely, and i prefer using IE better, because of tabs, and it&#8217;s content. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_eek.gif' alt='8O' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Please, I really need and answer. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif' alt=':mrgreen:' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Firefox Memory Issues A Thing of The Past? &#171; Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26123</link> <dc:creator>Firefox Memory Issues A Thing of The Past? &#171; Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:32:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/08/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26123</guid> <description>[...] A brief discussion regarding Firefox memory issues came about on CyberNet News in regards to the Internet Explorer 7 Release About The Same As Firefox 2 article.Â  One of the comments left by &#8216;Dave&#8217;: &#8220;In my opinion, we could see quite a few people move from Firefox to IE7. In the pre Firefox 1.5 days, there was this huge Firefox movement. But during the 1.5 builds, Iâ€™ve seen tons of people grow tired of the memory leaks and other bugs associated with Firefox such as the copy/paste bug.&#8221; [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A brief discussion regarding Firefox memory issues came about on CyberNet News in regards to the Internet Explorer 7 Release About The Same As Firefox 2 article.Â  One of the comments left by &#8216;Dave&#8217;: &#8220;In my opinion, we could see quite a few people move from Firefox to IE7. In the pre Firefox 1.5 days, there was this huge Firefox movement. But during the 1.5 builds, Iâ€™ve seen tons of people grow tired of the memory leaks and other bugs associated with Firefox such as the copy/paste bug.&#8221; [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SLA</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26077</link> <dc:creator>SLA</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 10:51:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/08/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26077</guid> <description>IE7 is still FULL OF BUGS, and there is many software products (using embedded IE) which doesn&#039;t work well with IE7. While Firefox 2 RC2 is, imho, production quality. :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IE7 is still FULL OF BUGS, and there is many software products (using embedded IE) which doesn&#8217;t work well with IE7.<br /> While Firefox 2 RC2 is, imho, production quality. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26051</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:44:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/08/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26051</guid> <description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-26049&quot;&gt;ffextensionguru wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Just did a quick check and noticed Flock wiht 1 tab open is using 76MB while Firefox 2 with 3 tabs is only using 50 MB!&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Flock is still based off of Firefox 1.5.* so I am sure it will still have some memory leaks. In fact there are a few memory leaks that Flock introduced themselves which has been one of the biggest complaints. To my knowledge they have not fixed them yet.There have been a lot of extensions getting updated which is great to see. I am sure anything helps to reduce the cause of memory leaks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-26049">ffextensionguru wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Just did a quick check and noticed Flock wiht 1 tab open is using 76MB while Firefox 2 with 3 tabs is only using 50 MB!</p></blockquote></div><p>Flock is still based off of Firefox 1.5.* so I am sure it will still have some memory leaks. In fact there are a few memory leaks that Flock introduced themselves which has been one of the biggest complaints. To my knowledge they have not fixed them yet.</p><p>There have been a lot of extensions getting updated which is great to see. I am sure anything helps to reduce the cause of memory leaks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ffextensionguru</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26050</link> <dc:creator>ffextensionguru</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:33:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/08/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26050</guid> <description>Further, I noticed a huge reduction in the past couple weeks (right after RC1) which was about the time there was huge surge in extension updates.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further, I noticed a huge reduction in the past couple weeks (right after RC1) which was about the time there was huge surge in extension updates.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ffextensionguru</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26049</link> <dc:creator>ffextensionguru</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:27:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/08/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26049</guid> <description>Just did a quick check and noticed Flock wiht 1 tab open is using 76MB while Firefox 2 with 3 tabs is only using 50 MB!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just did a quick check and noticed Flock wiht 1 tab open is using 76MB while Firefox 2 with 3 tabs is only using 50 MB!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26047</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:06:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/08/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26047</guid> <description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-26018&quot;&gt;ffextensionguru wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;In my opinion, we could see quite a few people move from Firefox to IE7. In the pre Firefox 1.5 days, there was this huge Firefox movement. But during the 1.5 builds, Iâ€™ve seen tons of people grow tired of the memory leaks and other bugs associated with Firefox such as the copy/paste bug.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Well, that is a negative stigma Firefox is going to have to change since these issues have been addressed and corrected in Firefox 2.  I been using Firefox 2 as well now as my primary browser and have seen a huge difference in performance and the memory leaks seem to have been plugged now as well.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; I agree, memory leaks now seem to be a thing of the past for me. Running Firefox on Windows Vista for two days straight without restarting and I&#039;m at 125MB. It is still a little high because Opera hangs around 70MB but I never get up into the 300-400MB range anymore. Thank goodness!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-26018">ffextensionguru wrote:</a><br /><blockquote><blockquote>In my opinion, we could see quite a few people move from Firefox to IE7. In the pre Firefox 1.5 days, there was this huge Firefox movement. But during the 1.5 builds, Iâ€™ve seen tons of people grow tired of the memory leaks and other bugs associated with Firefox such as the copy/paste bug.</p></blockquote><p>Well, that is a negative stigma Firefox is going to have to change since these issues have been addressed and corrected in Firefox 2.  I been using Firefox 2 as well now as my primary browser and have seen a huge difference in performance and the memory leaks seem to have been plugged now as well.</p></blockquote></div><p>I agree, memory leaks now seem to be a thing of the past for me. Running Firefox on Windows Vista for two days straight without restarting and I&#8217;m at 125MB. It is still a little high because Opera hangs around 70MB but I never get up into the 300-400MB range anymore. Thank goodness!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: OldManDeath</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26036</link> <dc:creator>OldManDeath</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 01:58:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/08/internet-explorer-7-release-about-the-same-as-firefox-2/#comment-26036</guid> <description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-26021&quot;&gt;fabiopsousa wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;In this moment well... i&#039;m pretty happy with FF 1.5 (0.7) and i ll eventually upgade to 2.0 when first update be realeased.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;I too was going to wait, however, I took the plunge to v2 RC2 and am glad that I did.  I really like the changes and it has run flawlessly.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-26021">fabiopsousa wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>In this moment well&#8230; i&#8217;m pretty happy with FF 1.5 (0.7) and i ll eventually upgade to 2.0 when first update be realeased.</p></blockquote></div><p>I too was going to wait, however, I took the plunge to v2 RC2 and am glad that I did.  I really like the changes and it has run flawlessly.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 318/339 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-27 04:46:12 -->
