<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Is your Spam Box Lighter today? Here&#8217;s Why&#8230;</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/is-your-spam-box-lighter-today-heres-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/is-your-spam-box-lighter-today-heres-why/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 02:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Juicy Links of the Week: June 1, 2007 : Exclusive Concepts Blog</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/is-your-spam-box-lighter-today-heres-why/#comment-102350</link> <dc:creator>Juicy Links of the Week: June 1, 2007 : Exclusive Concepts Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:37:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/05/31/is-your-spam-box-lighter-today-heres-why/#comment-102350</guid> <description>[...] CyberNet rejoices [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CyberNet rejoices [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/is-your-spam-box-lighter-today-heres-why/#comment-97456</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 19:36:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/05/31/is-your-spam-box-lighter-today-heres-why/#comment-97456</guid> <description>I still get 50 to 100 a day, but luckily Gmail nabs them all before they hit my Inbox!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still get 50 to 100 a day, but luckily Gmail nabs them all before they hit my Inbox!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dean</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/is-your-spam-box-lighter-today-heres-why/#comment-97439</link> <dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 18:28:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/05/31/is-your-spam-box-lighter-today-heres-why/#comment-97439</guid> <description>I&#039;ve seen a huge drop in spam reaching my gmail account over recent weeks.  Normally at any one time I would have between 100 and 200 messages sitting in my spam folder.  I let Google delete any  spam messages that are more than 30 days old.  Today I have only 7 messages in my spam folder  :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen a huge drop in spam reaching my gmail account over recent weeks.  Normally at any one time I would have between 100 and 200 messages sitting in my spam folder.  I let Google delete any  spam messages that are more than 30 days old.  Today I have only 7 messages in my spam folder <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Slasher</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/is-your-spam-box-lighter-today-heres-why/#comment-97239</link> <dc:creator>The Slasher</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 04:21:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/05/31/is-your-spam-box-lighter-today-heres-why/#comment-97239</guid> <description>I recommend SpamBayes for Outlook users. It&#039;s great. Train it up and spam is almost a distant memory.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recommend SpamBayes for Outlook users. It&#8217;s great. Train it up and spam is almost a distant memory.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 236/257 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-27 05:42:53 -->
