<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Joost Getting Ready For the Web</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/joost-getting-ready-for-the-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/joost-getting-ready-for-the-web/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 02:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/joost-getting-ready-for-the-web/#comment-143300</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 02:29:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15206#comment-143300</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-143119&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pieter wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I predict that Joost will go out of business in a few years. Hulu is miles ahead of them in North American territories when it comes to content and user-friendliness. They better step up their game before Europe and Asia lose interest in Joost too.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; I&#039;m totally with you there. I definitely think that Joost isn&#039;t doing as well as the founders probably anticipated that it would originally be doing. For me it&#039;s just that the content on there isn&#039;t appealing to my tastes.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-143119" rel="nofollow">Pieter wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>I predict that Joost will go out of business in a few years. Hulu is miles ahead of them in North American territories when it comes to content and user-friendliness. They better step up their game before Europe and Asia lose interest in Joost too.</p></blockquote></div><p>I&#8217;m totally with you there. I definitely think that Joost isn&#8217;t doing as well as the founders probably anticipated that it would originally be doing. For me it&#8217;s just that the content on there isn&#8217;t appealing to my tastes.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Daivd</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/joost-getting-ready-for-the-web/#comment-143139</link> <dc:creator>Daivd</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 04:24:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15206#comment-143139</guid> <description>I live in England and it&#039;s not that I don&#039;t want a desktop application to download and watch tv shows on, it&#039;s just that every channel wants me to install their own application. I did once install the iplayer, until I found out the damn thing was starting up with my computer even when I had told it not to, but I prefer to get things online now. I&#039;ve never really been that interested with Joost, what with the iplayer and &lt;a href=&quot;http://tv.blinkx.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a growing selection from other channels&lt;/a&gt;, but if it goes online I might try.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in England and it&#8217;s not that I don&#8217;t want a desktop application to download and watch tv shows on, it&#8217;s just that every channel wants me to install their own application. I did once install the iplayer, until I found out the damn thing was starting up with my computer even when I had told it not to, but I prefer to get things online now. I&#8217;ve never really been that interested with Joost, what with the iplayer and [<a href='http://tv.blinkx.com/,' rel='nofollow'>tv.blinkx.com</a>] but if it goes online I might try.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: leland</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/joost-getting-ready-for-the-web/#comment-143127</link> <dc:creator>leland</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:56:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15206#comment-143127</guid> <description>I rather like Joost in some ways better than Hulu.  Hulu is nice in some ways, but seems to be way more congested at the times I want to use it.  I have a plenty fast connection so I do not understand that.  I think both have their place and much of what is offered is different enough I think they both have a place.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rather like Joost in some ways better than Hulu.  Hulu is nice in some ways, but seems to be way more congested at the times I want to use it.  I have a plenty fast connection so I do not understand that.  I think both have their place and much of what is offered is different enough I think they both have a place.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pieter</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/joost-getting-ready-for-the-web/#comment-143119</link> <dc:creator>Pieter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 09:21:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15206#comment-143119</guid> <description>I predict that Joost will go out of business in a few years. Hulu is miles ahead of them in North American territories when it comes to content and user-friendliness. They better step up their game before Europe and Asia lose interest in Joost too.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I predict that Joost will go out of business in a few years. Hulu is miles ahead of them in North American territories when it comes to content and user-friendliness. They better step up their game before Europe and Asia lose interest in Joost too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 232/253 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-27 05:49:56 -->
