<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joost Getting Ready For the Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/joost-getting-ready-for-the-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/joost-getting-ready-for-the-web/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:19:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/joost-getting-ready-for-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-143300</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 02:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15206#comment-143300</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-143119&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pieter wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I predict that Joost will go out of business in a few years. Hulu is miles ahead of them in North American territories when it comes to content and user-friendliness. They better step up their game before Europe and Asia lose interest in Joost too.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I&#039;m totally with you there. I definitely think that Joost isn&#039;t doing as well as the founders probably anticipated that it would originally be doing. For me it&#039;s just that the content on there isn&#039;t appealing to my tastes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-143119" rel="nofollow">Pieter wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I predict that Joost will go out of business in a few years. Hulu is miles ahead of them in North American territories when it comes to content and user-friendliness. They better step up their game before Europe and Asia lose interest in Joost too.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I&#8217;m totally with you there. I definitely think that Joost isn&#8217;t doing as well as the founders probably anticipated that it would originally be doing. For me it&#8217;s just that the content on there isn&#8217;t appealing to my tastes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daivd</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/joost-getting-ready-for-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-143139</link>
		<dc:creator>Daivd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 04:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15206#comment-143139</guid>
		<description>I live in England and it&#039;s not that I don&#039;t want a desktop application to download and watch tv shows on, it&#039;s just that every channel wants me to install their own application. I did once install the iplayer, until I found out the damn thing was starting up with my computer even when I had told it not to, but I prefer to get things online now. I&#039;ve never really been that interested with Joost, what with the iplayer and &lt;a href=&quot;http://tv.blinkx.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a growing selection from other channels&lt;/a&gt;, but if it goes online I might try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in England and it&#8217;s not that I don&#8217;t want a desktop application to download and watch tv shows on, it&#8217;s just that every channel wants me to install their own application. I did once install the iplayer, until I found out the damn thing was starting up with my computer even when I had told it not to, but I prefer to get things online now. I&#8217;ve never really been that interested with Joost, what with the iplayer and [<a href='http://tv.blinkx.com/,' rel='nofollow'>tv.blinkx.com</a>] but if it goes online I might try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leland</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/joost-getting-ready-for-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-143127</link>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15206#comment-143127</guid>
		<description>I rather like Joost in some ways better than Hulu.  Hulu is nice in some ways, but seems to be way more congested at the times I want to use it.  I have a plenty fast connection so I do not understand that.  I think both have their place and much of what is offered is different enough I think they both have a place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rather like Joost in some ways better than Hulu.  Hulu is nice in some ways, but seems to be way more congested at the times I want to use it.  I have a plenty fast connection so I do not understand that.  I think both have their place and much of what is offered is different enough I think they both have a place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pieter</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/joost-getting-ready-for-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-143119</link>
		<dc:creator>Pieter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 09:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15206#comment-143119</guid>
		<description>I predict that Joost will go out of business in a few years. Hulu is miles ahead of them in North American territories when it comes to content and user-friendliness. They better step up their game before Europe and Asia lose interest in Joost too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I predict that Joost will go out of business in a few years. Hulu is miles ahead of them in North American territories when it comes to content and user-friendliness. They better step up their game before Europe and Asia lose interest in Joost too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
