<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kaspersky: Oops, was that Windows Explorer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/kaspersky-oops-was-that-windows-explorer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/kaspersky-oops-was-that-windows-explorer/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:19:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/kaspersky-oops-was-that-windows-explorer/comment-page-1/#comment-127618</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 21:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/21/kaspersky-oops-was-that-windows-explorer/#comment-127618</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-127283&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;yeshu wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;kaspersky sucks..i swear by nod32

and by the way, Ryan, nod 32 3.0.621.0 version is out…hope this fixes the problem you have been having..&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
The new version of NOD32 does fix the problem I was having. They emailed me immediately upon the release of the new version, and I gave it a whirl. I was very happy to see everything working again!

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-127412&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Con wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Hey -just read your comments on this and I am sorry if any of this is causing you grief. OK, I work for Symantec, but maybe&#160;it’s time to take the Norton Challenge!&#160;Check&#160;this out –&#160;http://www.takethenortonchallenge.com. It might be time&#160;to try Norton again, there’s a&#160;money back guarantee!!&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Even if Norton was good it would be hard to get me to come back to it. They&#039;ve almost forever tarnished their reputation with me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-127283" rel="nofollow">yeshu wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>kaspersky sucks..i swear by nod32</p>
<p>and by the way, Ryan, nod 32 3.0.621.0 version is out…hope this fixes the problem you have been having..</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>The new version of NOD32 does fix the problem I was having. They emailed me immediately upon the release of the new version, and I gave it a whirl. I was very happy to see everything working again!</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-127412" rel="nofollow">Con wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Hey -just read your comments on this and I am sorry if any of this is causing you grief. OK, I work for Symantec, but maybe&nbsp;it’s time to take the Norton Challenge!&nbsp;Check&nbsp;this out –&nbsp;[<a href='http://www.takethenortonchallenge.com.' rel='nofollow'>takethenortonchallenge.com.</a>] It might be time&nbsp;to try Norton again, there’s a&nbsp;money back guarantee!!</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Even if Norton was good it would be hard to get me to come back to it. They&#8217;ve almost forever tarnished their reputation with me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Con</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/kaspersky-oops-was-that-windows-explorer/comment-page-1/#comment-127412</link>
		<dc:creator>Con</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 09:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/21/kaspersky-oops-was-that-windows-explorer/#comment-127412</guid>
		<description>Hey -just read your comments on this and I am sorry if any of this is causing you grief. OK, I work for Symantec, but maybe it&#039;s time to take the Norton Challenge! Check this out -- http://www.takethenortonchallenge.com. It might be time to try Norton again, there&#039;s a money back guarantee!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey -just read your comments on this and I am sorry if any of this is causing you grief. OK, I work for Symantec, but maybe it&#8217;s time to take the Norton Challenge! Check this out &#8211; [<a href='http://www.takethenortonchallenge.com.' rel='nofollow'>takethenortonchallenge.com.</a>] It might be time to try Norton again, there&#8217;s a money back guarantee!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/kaspersky-oops-was-that-windows-explorer/comment-page-1/#comment-127298</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 19:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/21/kaspersky-oops-was-that-windows-explorer/#comment-127298</guid>
		<description>F-Secure and Sophos are also good &quot;these days&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F-Secure and Sophos are also good &#8220;these days&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yeshu</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/kaspersky-oops-was-that-windows-explorer/comment-page-1/#comment-127283</link>
		<dc:creator>yeshu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 12:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/21/kaspersky-oops-was-that-windows-explorer/#comment-127283</guid>
		<description>kaspersky sucks..i swear by nod32

and by the way, Ryan, nod 32 3.0.621.0 version is out...hope this fixes the problem you have been having..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kaspersky sucks..i swear by nod32</p>
<p>and by the way, Ryan, nod 32 3.0.621.0 version is out&#8230;hope this fixes the problem you have been having..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
