<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Latest Firefox 3 Nightly Passes The Acid 2 Test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/latest-firefox-3-nightly-passes-the-acid-2-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/latest-firefox-3-nightly-passes-the-acid-2-test/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:45:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog Fx Year In Review &#171;</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/latest-firefox-3-nightly-passes-the-acid-2-test/comment-page-1/#comment-89292</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog Fx Year In Review &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 23:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/09/latest-firefox-3-nightly-passes-the-acid-2-test/#comment-89292</guid>
		<description>[...] Only a couple items that I am aware of so far in this release. The new about:config warning, Acid 2 compliance and anti-alias (smoother and rounder) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Only a couple items that I am aware of so far in this release. The new about:config warning, Acid 2 compliance and anti-alias (smoother and rounder) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOOOMKULTUS</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/latest-firefox-3-nightly-passes-the-acid-2-test/comment-page-1/#comment-54321</link>
		<dc:creator>DOOOMKULTUS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 13:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/09/latest-firefox-3-nightly-passes-the-acid-2-test/#comment-54321</guid>
		<description>Its a illusion that a product will remain perfect always,it in itself is a contradiction.Such was the thought pattern of MS towards IE (thats its the best and will always be)So better avoid such thinking man.
By google i meant that they were the darling of net community some time back now they going momopolist kind of way,which is totally understandable since they have to survive in this bussiness,Same will happen to FF coz other companies with go for their heads once they r on top and they will do things which majority like u will disagree(proof is  this happens all the time).Infact wasn&#039;t there some controversy over some rights issue of feeds button logo which mozila was prohibitting to others or something(sorry for being not specific),but eventually got resolved,just the nature of things to come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a illusion that a product will remain perfect always,it in itself is a contradiction.Such was the thought pattern of MS towards IE (thats its the best and will always be)So better avoid such thinking man.<br />
By google i meant that they were the darling of net community some time back now they going momopolist kind of way,which is totally understandable since they have to survive in this bussiness,Same will happen to FF coz other companies with go for their heads once they r on top and they will do things which majority like u will disagree(proof is  this happens all the time).Infact wasn&#8217;t there some controversy over some rights issue of feeds button logo which mozila was prohibitting to others or something(sorry for being not specific),but eventually got resolved,just the nature of things to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SLA</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/latest-firefox-3-nightly-passes-the-acid-2-test/comment-page-1/#comment-52932</link>
		<dc:creator>SLA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/09/latest-firefox-3-nightly-passes-the-acid-2-test/#comment-52932</guid>
		<description>What I was talking about, is that Firefox will be CONSTANTLY on development.
For example, Microsoft dropped its IE development for some years, and now their browser is the WORST on the market.
Firefox is different, it soon will become the BEST browser in the planet. I&#039;m 100% sure.

Also, Firefox will ALWAYS remain free. Just because it is released under Mozilla License. If Mozilla will decide to do something terribly wrong with Firefox (I&#039;m sure, they will NOT), for example, make it closed-source, or shareware, or adware, or spyware, then they will have to change the license. What will happen? Free developers will get the source code of previous version of Firefox (which is still under Mozilla License), and they will start developing NEW browser. In fact, browser&#039;s name will be changed from &quot;Firefox&quot; to something another, but it will be the SAME free and good browser. We have some such examples now, take a look at &quot;Flock&quot; browser.

Also Mozilla is an organization of FREE developers, and THOSE PEOPLE will decide, which way Firefox will go tomorrow. Not Google. Not Yahoo. Mozilla depends on those people, thats why THEY will decide.

That&#039;s why Firefox will ALWAYS remain the same (open-source, free, modern, constantly developed, perfect) browser. It is just the ONLY right way of its evolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I was talking about, is that Firefox will be CONSTANTLY on development.<br />
For example, Microsoft dropped its IE development for some years, and now their browser is the WORST on the market.<br />
Firefox is different, it soon will become the BEST browser in the planet. I&#8217;m 100% sure.</p>
<p>Also, Firefox will ALWAYS remain free. Just because it is released under Mozilla License. If Mozilla will decide to do something terribly wrong with Firefox (I&#8217;m sure, they will NOT), for example, make it closed-source, or shareware, or adware, or spyware, then they will have to change the license. What will happen? Free developers will get the source code of previous version of Firefox (which is still under Mozilla License), and they will start developing NEW browser. In fact, browser&#8217;s name will be changed from &#8220;Firefox&#8221; to something another, but it will be the SAME free and good browser. We have some such examples now, take a look at &#8220;Flock&#8221; browser.</p>
<p>Also Mozilla is an organization of FREE developers, and THOSE PEOPLE will decide, which way Firefox will go tomorrow. Not Google. Not Yahoo. Mozilla depends on those people, thats why THEY will decide.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why Firefox will ALWAYS remain the same (open-source, free, modern, constantly developed, perfect) browser. It is just the ONLY right way of its evolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOOOMKULTUS</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/latest-firefox-3-nightly-passes-the-acid-2-test/comment-page-1/#comment-52242</link>
		<dc:creator>DOOOMKULTUS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/09/latest-firefox-3-nightly-passes-the-acid-2-test/#comment-52242</guid>
		<description>Just coz some software is closed ware doesnt make it worse look at utorrrent compared to azureus.
Its a bussiness my friend who ever wants to survive will have to be cut throat,So will FF in order to maintain its dominance and understanding the super senstive internet community towards change,it will definetly pay.
Look at google going the WE know Best way,Youtube selling out,digg on the verge of it,its a bussines and FF will folow suite.Its a fact u just dont want to admit it i guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just coz some software is closed ware doesnt make it worse look at utorrrent compared to azureus.<br />
Its a bussiness my friend who ever wants to survive will have to be cut throat,So will FF in order to maintain its dominance and understanding the super senstive internet community towards change,it will definetly pay.<br />
Look at google going the WE know Best way,Youtube selling out,digg on the verge of it,its a bussines and FF will folow suite.Its a fact u just dont want to admit it i guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Acid2 Timeline &#124; K-Squared Ramblings</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/latest-firefox-3-nightly-passes-the-acid-2-test/comment-page-1/#comment-52231</link>
		<dc:creator>Acid2 Timeline &#124; K-Squared Ramblings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/09/latest-firefox-3-nightly-passes-the-acid-2-test/#comment-52231</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: December 9, 2006: Development builds of Firefox pass [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: December 9, 2006: Development builds of Firefox pass [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SLA</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/latest-firefox-3-nightly-passes-the-acid-2-test/comment-page-1/#comment-51666</link>
		<dc:creator>SLA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/09/latest-firefox-3-nightly-passes-the-acid-2-test/#comment-51666</guid>
		<description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-51551&quot;&gt;DOOOMKULTUS wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Firefox going MS way u&#039;ll see dude just as they jump 50 %&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

You are definitely wrong. IE is developed by COMMERCIAL CORPORATION, and Firefox is developed by FREE COMMUNITY.

You can&#039;t order MS to develop IE, but with Firefox it is different - you yourself can participate in development process at any time! There are thousands volunteers, who will continue developing Firefox forever.

BTW, Opera is closed-source browser. Just like IE. Understand the difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-51551">DOOOMKULTUS wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Firefox going MS way u&#8217;ll see dude just as they jump 50 %</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>You are definitely wrong. IE is developed by COMMERCIAL CORPORATION, and Firefox is developed by FREE COMMUNITY.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t order MS to develop IE, but with Firefox it is different &#8211; you yourself can participate in development process at any time! There are thousands volunteers, who will continue developing Firefox forever.</p>
<p>BTW, Opera is closed-source browser. Just like IE. Understand the difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOOOMKULTUS</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/latest-firefox-3-nightly-passes-the-acid-2-test/comment-page-1/#comment-51551</link>
		<dc:creator>DOOOMKULTUS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/09/latest-firefox-3-nightly-passes-the-acid-2-test/#comment-51551</guid>
		<description>To the Anonymous Firefox fanboy Arguing doesn&#039;t make a browser compliant,
Safari u say man ur retarted or something it doesnt even work in anything other than mac.

&lt;blockquote&gt;So Opera is technologically BACKWARD also because is passes the Adid?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
What is Adid?
and since acid 2 was passed by opera earlier than firefox make ur statement null and void.
Where is u&#039;r logic man.
Firefox going MS way u&#039;ll see dude just as they jump 50 %</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the Anonymous Firefox fanboy Arguing doesn&#8217;t make a browser compliant,<br />
Safari u say man ur retarted or something it doesnt even work in anything other than mac.</p>
<blockquote><p>So Opera is technologically BACKWARD also because is passes the Adid?</p></blockquote>
<p>What is Adid?<br />
and since acid 2 was passed by opera earlier than firefox make ur statement null and void.<br />
Where is u&#8217;r logic man.<br />
Firefox going MS way u&#8217;ll see dude just as they jump 50 %</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/latest-firefox-3-nightly-passes-the-acid-2-test/comment-page-1/#comment-51007</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/09/latest-firefox-3-nightly-passes-the-acid-2-test/#comment-51007</guid>
		<description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-50796&quot;&gt;DOOOMKULTUS wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Blah blah blah so FF passes acid big deal,this is what i call technologically BACKWARD.
Opera is the most standards complaiant browser on the internet and irony is its not used by many for the excuse that it doesnt display certain pages correctly (which is the fault of webdesigners not OPERA)&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

To the Opera fanboy, Opera is NOT the most standards compliant browser...

One could argue it is
1)Firefox
2)Safari
3)Opera
4)Konqueror
5)Internet Explorer 5 for Mac

So Opera is technologically BACKWARD also because is passes the Adid?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-50796">DOOOMKULTUS wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Blah blah blah so FF passes acid big deal,this is what i call technologically BACKWARD.<br />
Opera is the most standards complaiant browser on the internet and irony is its not used by many for the excuse that it doesnt display certain pages correctly (which is the fault of webdesigners not OPERA)</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>To the Opera fanboy, Opera is NOT the most standards compliant browser&#8230;</p>
<p>One could argue it is<br />
1)Firefox<br />
2)Safari<br />
3)Opera<br />
4)Konqueror<br />
5)Internet Explorer 5 for Mac</p>
<p>So Opera is technologically BACKWARD also because is passes the Adid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firefoXtensions, el blog de las extensiones para Firefox :: Torpedeando Firefox 3 :: December :: 2006</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/latest-firefox-3-nightly-passes-the-acid-2-test/comment-page-1/#comment-50829</link>
		<dc:creator>firefoXtensions, el blog de las extensiones para Firefox :: Torpedeando Firefox 3 :: December :: 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/09/latest-firefox-3-nightly-passes-the-acid-2-test/#comment-50829</guid>
		<description>[...] antes de que se pueda sacar algo en claro de esta nueva versiÃ³n.   Guardado en Firefox Reloaded URI para Trackbacks    RSS paraposts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] antes de que se pueda sacar algo en claro de esta nueva versiÃ³n.   Guardado en Firefox Reloaded URI para Trackbacks    RSS paraposts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Ãºltima versiÃ³n de desarrollo de Firefox 3 pasa el Acid Test 2</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/latest-firefox-3-nightly-passes-the-acid-2-test/comment-page-1/#comment-50811</link>
		<dc:creator>La Ãºltima versiÃ³n de desarrollo de Firefox 3 pasa el Acid Test 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/09/latest-firefox-3-nightly-passes-the-acid-2-test/#comment-50811</guid>
		<description>[...] VÃ­a &#124; Cybernet Enlace &#124; Portable Firefox 3 Acid test 2 Enlace &#124; Acid2 Test [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VÃ­a | Cybernet Enlace | Portable Firefox 3 Acid test 2 Enlace | Acid2 Test [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
