<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft and Yahoo Part Ways for Good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-and-yahoo-part-ways-for-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-and-yahoo-part-ways-for-good/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:45:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-and-yahoo-part-ways-for-good/comment-page-1/#comment-139163</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13100#comment-139163</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-139156&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lashiec wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I never really understood Yahoo deal with Google, considering that they also have their own ad system, it’s like going against your own business in a certain way. Oh well, if they gain a good avenue of revenue to stay around, I guess they can’t complain. Not to mention nobody liked the idea of Microhoo (or whatever you want to call it :D)&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
It&#039;s estimated to bring in an extra few hundred million a year for Yahoo, so it makes sense teaming up with Google from that standpoint. Although it does have to make some advertisers on Yahoo&#039;s network question why they are advertising there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-139156" rel="nofollow">Lashiec wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I never really understood Yahoo deal with Google, considering that they also have their own ad system, it’s like going against your own business in a certain way. Oh well, if they gain a good avenue of revenue to stay around, I guess they can’t complain. Not to mention nobody liked the idea of Microhoo (or whatever you want to call it <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>It&#8217;s estimated to bring in an extra few hundred million a year for Yahoo, so it makes sense teaming up with Google from that standpoint. Although it does have to make some advertisers on Yahoo&#8217;s network question why they are advertising there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lashiec</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-and-yahoo-part-ways-for-good/comment-page-1/#comment-139156</link>
		<dc:creator>Lashiec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13100#comment-139156</guid>
		<description>I never really understood Yahoo deal with Google, considering that they also have their own ad system, it&#039;s like going against your own business in a certain way. Oh well, if they gain a good avenue of revenue to stay around, I guess they can&#039;t complain. Not to mention nobody liked the idea of Microhoo (or whatever you want to call it :D)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never really understood Yahoo deal with Google, considering that they also have their own ad system, it&#8217;s like going against your own business in a certain way. Oh well, if they gain a good avenue of revenue to stay around, I guess they can&#8217;t complain. Not to mention nobody liked the idea of Microhoo (or whatever you want to call it <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
