<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Microsoft Announces They&#8217;re Still Interested in Yahoo</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-announces-theyre-still-interested-in-yahoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-announces-theyre-still-interested-in-yahoo/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:40:50 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Ashley</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-announces-theyre-still-interested-in-yahoo/#comment-140401</link> <dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:57:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13569#comment-140401</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-140354&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Omar Upegui wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Why is Microsoft still interested in Yahoo?  Don’t they have the human resources and know-how to compete with Google?It seems to me, Microsoft is a lot weaker in the search domain than Steve Ballmer will publicly acknowledge.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Search is definitely one area Microsoft is looking to improve on -- they just bought PowerSet and I&#039;m sure they&#039;ll continue to acquire companies they believe will help them out in this area.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-140354" rel="nofollow">Omar Upegui wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Why is Microsoft still interested in Yahoo?  Don’t they have the human resources and know-how to compete with Google?</p><p>It seems to me, Microsoft is a lot weaker in the search domain than Steve Ballmer will publicly acknowledge.</p></blockquote></div><p>Search is definitely one area Microsoft is looking to improve on &#8212; they just bought PowerSet and I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll continue to acquire companies they believe will help them out in this area.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Omar Upegui</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-announces-theyre-still-interested-in-yahoo/#comment-140354</link> <dc:creator>Omar Upegui</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:41:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13569#comment-140354</guid> <description>Why is Microsoft still interested in Yahoo?  Don&#039;t they have the human resources and know-how to compete with Google?It seems to me, Microsoft is a lot weaker in the search domain than Steve Ballmer will publicly acknowledge.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is Microsoft still interested in Yahoo?  Don&#8217;t they have the human resources and know-how to compete with Google?</p><p>It seems to me, Microsoft is a lot weaker in the search domain than Steve Ballmer will publicly acknowledge.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-announces-theyre-still-interested-in-yahoo/#comment-140340</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:52:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13569#comment-140340</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-140339&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Risk Management wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;yea if yahoo will turn away 44 billion and even 80 billion (was it?) i dont think they will ever be bought out. It appears they want too much money. Im not sure what this means for the future of both these companies but i dont think either of them will ever be able to compete with google single-handedly.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; True, and I&#039;m not very confident that merging the two companies would be the best solution for consumers either. That would leave two major players in the search industry, and I don&#039;t think that would be a good thing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-140339" rel="nofollow">Risk Management wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>yea if yahoo will turn away 44 billion and even 80 billion (was it?) i dont think they will ever be bought out. It appears they want too much money. Im not sure what this means for the future of both these companies but i dont think either of them will ever be able to compete with google single-handedly.</p></blockquote></div><p>True, and I&#8217;m not very confident that merging the two companies would be the best solution for consumers either. That would leave two major players in the search industry, and I don&#8217;t think that would be a good thing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Risk Management</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-announces-theyre-still-interested-in-yahoo/#comment-140339</link> <dc:creator>Risk Management</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:36:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13569#comment-140339</guid> <description>yea if yahoo will turn away 44 billion and even 80 billion (was it?) i dont think they will ever be bought out. It appears they want too much money. Im not sure what this means for the future of both these companies but i dont think either of them will ever be able to compete with google single-handedly. -Jerry</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yea if yahoo will turn away 44 billion and even 80 billion (was it?) i dont think they will ever be bought out. It appears they want too much money. Im not sure what this means for the future of both these companies but i dont think either of them will ever be able to compete with google single-handedly.<br /> -Jerry</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 226/245 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-02-13 11:14:55 -->
