<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Automatically Schedules Defragmentation In Vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-automatically-schedules-defragmentation-in-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-automatically-schedules-defragmentation-in-vista/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:19:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Inferno_str1ke</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-automatically-schedules-defragmentation-in-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-14976</link>
		<dc:creator>Inferno_str1ke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/07/18/microsoft-automatically-schedules-defragmentation-in-vista/#comment-14976</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve rarely deferagmented a drive, and speaking as one who (as you may have noticed) is rather into computers I don&#039;t think this is that great a feature. For a start with the size of drives these days a defragment could take a whole hour to complete, which isn&#039;t what you want hogging your processor on boot. Secondly I&#039;ve never actually seen a performance benefit from a defragment. Maybe on a slow machine with not enough memory (anything less than 1GB) it would be a problem, but not on a decent specced PC. I may try a standard XP defrag at some point and see if I notice a difference, but I shan&#039;t hold my breath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve rarely deferagmented a drive, and speaking as one who (as you may have noticed) is rather into computers I don&#8217;t think this is that great a feature. For a start with the size of drives these days a defragment could take a whole hour to complete, which isn&#8217;t what you want hogging your processor on boot. Secondly I&#8217;ve never actually seen a performance benefit from a defragment. Maybe on a slow machine with not enough memory (anything less than 1GB) it would be a problem, but not on a decent specced PC. I may try a standard XP defrag at some point and see if I notice a difference, but I shan&#8217;t hold my breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrÃ©</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-automatically-schedules-defragmentation-in-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-14930</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrÃ©</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/07/18/microsoft-automatically-schedules-defragmentation-in-vista/#comment-14930</guid>
		<description>Hi!

Ehm, this is kind of stone age, right? I mean, Diskeeper (http://www.diskeeper.com/defrag.asp) does this since years, and even smarter: It automatically defrags when your PC is idle, and stops when you continue to work. I have my old version 7 running on XP, and it runs smoothly without any issues.

I still think MS is far behind.

Just my 5 cents.

AndrÃ©</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!</p>
<p>Ehm, this is kind of stone age, right? I mean, Diskeeper ([<a href='http://www.diskeeper.com/defrag.asp' rel='nofollow'>diskeeper.com</a>]) does this since years, and even smarter: It automatically defrags when your PC is idle, and stops when you continue to work. I have my old version 7 running on XP, and it runs smoothly without any issues.</p>
<p>I still think MS is far behind.</p>
<p>Just my 5 cents.</p>
<p>AndrÃ©</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-automatically-schedules-defragmentation-in-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-6989</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/07/18/microsoft-automatically-schedules-defragmentation-in-vista/#comment-6989</guid>
		<description>5669</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5669</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
