<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Microsoft Automatically Schedules Defragmentation In Vista</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-automatically-schedules-defragmentation-in-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-automatically-schedules-defragmentation-in-vista/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 02:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Inferno_str1ke</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-automatically-schedules-defragmentation-in-vista/#comment-14976</link> <dc:creator>Inferno_str1ke</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:22:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/07/18/microsoft-automatically-schedules-defragmentation-in-vista/#comment-14976</guid> <description>I&#039;ve rarely deferagmented a drive, and speaking as one who (as you may have noticed) is rather into computers I don&#039;t think this is that great a feature. For a start with the size of drives these days a defragment could take a whole hour to complete, which isn&#039;t what you want hogging your processor on boot. Secondly I&#039;ve never actually seen a performance benefit from a defragment. Maybe on a slow machine with not enough memory (anything less than 1GB) it would be a problem, but not on a decent specced PC. I may try a standard XP defrag at some point and see if I notice a difference, but I shan&#039;t hold my breath.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve rarely deferagmented a drive, and speaking as one who (as you may have noticed) is rather into computers I don&#8217;t think this is that great a feature. For a start with the size of drives these days a defragment could take a whole hour to complete, which isn&#8217;t what you want hogging your processor on boot. Secondly I&#8217;ve never actually seen a performance benefit from a defragment. Maybe on a slow machine with not enough memory (anything less than 1GB) it would be a problem, but not on a decent specced PC. I may try a standard XP defrag at some point and see if I notice a difference, but I shan&#8217;t hold my breath.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: AndrÃ©</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-automatically-schedules-defragmentation-in-vista/#comment-14930</link> <dc:creator>AndrÃ©</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:20:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/07/18/microsoft-automatically-schedules-defragmentation-in-vista/#comment-14930</guid> <description>Hi!Ehm, this is kind of stone age, right? I mean, Diskeeper (http://www.diskeeper.com/defrag.asp) does this since years, and even smarter: It automatically defrags when your PC is idle, and stops when you continue to work. I have my old version 7 running on XP, and it runs smoothly without any issues.I still think MS is far behind.Just my 5 cents.AndrÃ©</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!</p><p>Ehm, this is kind of stone age, right? I mean, Diskeeper ([<a href='http://www.diskeeper.com/defrag.asp' rel='nofollow'>diskeeper.com</a>]) does this since years, and even smarter: It automatically defrags when your PC is idle, and stops when you continue to work. I have my old version 7 running on XP, and it runs smoothly without any issues.</p><p>I still think MS is far behind.</p><p>Just my 5 cents.</p><p>AndrÃ©</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bill</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-automatically-schedules-defragmentation-in-vista/#comment-6989</link> <dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:22:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/07/18/microsoft-automatically-schedules-defragmentation-in-vista/#comment-6989</guid> <description>5669</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5669</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 221/242 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-27 03:18:51 -->
