<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Microsoft Fined $690 Million in Antitrust Suit</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-fined-690-million-in-antitrust-suit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-fined-690-million-in-antitrust-suit/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 02:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-fined-690-million-in-antitrust-suit/#comment-115692</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 22:14:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/17/microsoft-fined-690-million-in-antitrust-suit/#comment-115692</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-115599&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Zoltan Farkas wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Forcing monopolies to allow interoperability is nothing new&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; That&#039;s true, but to hurt a consumer&#039;s out-of-box experience by not including Windows Media Player is bad in my opinion. From what I gather they still offered the version for sale with the media player, but it&#039;s just more confusion for consumers who are picking up a copy.&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-115604&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Andrew wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Yeah but I bet with Mac you can uninstall iTunes, but with Microsoft you can’t uninstall anything just make the icon hidden.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; There is an option in the Add/Remove Programs to remove Windows components. You can even remove Internet Explorer if you wish.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-115599" rel="nofollow">Zoltan Farkas wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Forcing monopolies to allow interoperability is nothing new</p></blockquote></div><p>That&#8217;s true, but to hurt a consumer&#8217;s out-of-box experience by not including Windows Media Player is bad in my opinion. From what I gather they still offered the version for sale with the media player, but it&#8217;s just more confusion for consumers who are picking up a copy.</p><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-115604" rel="nofollow">Andrew wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Yeah but I bet with Mac you can uninstall iTunes, but with Microsoft you can’t uninstall anything just make the icon hidden.</p></blockquote></div><p>There is an option in the Add/Remove Programs to remove Windows components. You can even remove Internet Explorer if you wish.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-fined-690-million-in-antitrust-suit/#comment-115604</link> <dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:27:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/17/microsoft-fined-690-million-in-antitrust-suit/#comment-115604</guid> <description>Yeah but I bet with Mac you can uninstall iTunes, but with Microsoft you can&#039;t uninstall anything just make the icon hidden.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah but I bet with Mac you can uninstall iTunes, but with Microsoft you can&#8217;t uninstall anything just make the icon hidden.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zoltan Farkas</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-fined-690-million-in-antitrust-suit/#comment-115599</link> <dc:creator>Zoltan Farkas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:53:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/17/microsoft-fined-690-million-in-antitrust-suit/#comment-115599</guid> <description>Forcing monopolies to allow interoperability is nothing new:This is quite similar to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hush-a-Phone_v._FCC.No microsoft employee complains about that ruling against ATT. I guess it&#039;s OK to attack another monopoly.A message to the microsoft employees: Stop Whining!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forcing monopolies to allow interoperability is nothing new:</p><p>This is quite similar to [<a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hush-a-Phone_v._FCC.' rel='nofollow'>en.wikipedia.org</a>]</p><p>No microsoft employee complains about that ruling against ATT. I guess it&#8217;s OK to attack another monopoly.</p><p>A message to the microsoft employees: Stop Whining!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 221/242 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-27 07:02:38 -->
