<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Has A Reduced Functionality Mode In Office 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-has-a-reduced-functionality-mode-in-office-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-has-a-reduced-functionality-mode-in-office-2007/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:53:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-has-a-reduced-functionality-mode-in-office-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-40710</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/20/microsoft-has-a-reduced-functionality-mode-in-office-2007/#comment-40710</guid>
		<description>I agree that the older versions of Office still do everything that most people will require but Office 2007 looks so pretty. :)

I have been using the beta of Office 2007 for quite some time now and I have become very accustomed to it. Unfortunately I think it would be hard for me to go back to using any other Office Suite. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the older versions of Office still do everything that most people will require but Office 2007 looks so pretty. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I have been using the beta of Office 2007 for quite some time now and I have become very accustomed to it. Unfortunately I think it would be hard for me to go back to using any other Office Suite. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MetaMan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-has-a-reduced-functionality-mode-in-office-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-40703</link>
		<dc:creator>MetaMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/20/microsoft-has-a-reduced-functionality-mode-in-office-2007/#comment-40703</guid>
		<description>Classic MS.  Only seeing the job halfway through, and way too late.  I&#039;m not going to upgrade either, though.  Office 2003 is good enough for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Classic MS.  Only seeing the job halfway through, and way too late.  I&#8217;m not going to upgrade either, though.  Office 2003 is good enough for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheSlasher</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-has-a-reduced-functionality-mode-in-office-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-40681</link>
		<dc:creator>TheSlasher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/20/microsoft-has-a-reduced-functionality-mode-in-office-2007/#comment-40681</guid>
		<description>Just stick with Office 2000 - still has the basic features for 90% of the population.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just stick with Office 2000 &#8211; still has the basic features for 90% of the population.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
