<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft says &#8220;not so fast&#8221; on DoubleClick Deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-says-not-so-fast-on-doubleclick-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-says-not-so-fast-on-doubleclick-deal/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:29:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Accusing Google of Antitrust! &#171; Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-says-not-so-fast-on-doubleclick-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-94422</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Accusing Google of Antitrust! &#171; Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/16/microsoft-says-not-so-fast-on-doubleclick-deal/#comment-94422</guid>
		<description>[...] Granted Microsoft has plenty of experience with antitrust suits, except they are usually the one&#8217;s being accused. Seems Google has a bit of a problem with all this money burning holes in their pockets. They&#8217;ve been involved in several mergers over the past few months including YouTube back in October.  News Source: CyberNet News  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Granted Microsoft has plenty of experience with antitrust suits, except they are usually the one&#8217;s being accused. Seems Google has a bit of a problem with all this money burning holes in their pockets. They&#8217;ve been involved in several mergers over the past few months including YouTube back in October.  News Source: CyberNet News  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fx Extension Guru</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-says-not-so-fast-on-doubleclick-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-94271</link>
		<dc:creator>Fx Extension Guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/16/microsoft-says-not-so-fast-on-doubleclick-deal/#comment-94271</guid>
		<description>What the heck!  Since when is Microsoft on the accusing end of an anti-trust suit :?:  Granted Google does seem to have a lot of money to burn latley, but still.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the heck!  Since when is Microsoft on the accusing end of an anti-trust suit <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_question.gif' alt=':?:' class='wp-smiley' />   Granted Google does seem to have a lot of money to burn latley, but still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-says-not-so-fast-on-doubleclick-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-94264</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/16/microsoft-says-not-so-fast-on-doubleclick-deal/#comment-94264</guid>
		<description>Wow, this is really ridiculous. Google was already an authority in the advertising industry and now they are just trying to expand their offering. Last I heard Microsoft had 90% of the OS market so I think they are just digging themselves into a hole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this is really ridiculous. Google was already an authority in the advertising industry and now they are just trying to expand their offering. Last I heard Microsoft had 90% of the OS market so I think they are just digging themselves into a hole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-says-not-so-fast-on-doubleclick-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-94263</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/16/microsoft-says-not-so-fast-on-doubleclick-deal/#comment-94263</guid>
		<description>Mr. Pot, meet Mr. Kettle.

Oh, the irony. Microsoft gets its clock cleaned by Google yet again, and immediately whines to the Feds. 

A pox on Ballmer&#039;s house. With yet another instance of Microsoft&#039;s inadequacies, it is no wonder that the stock price has been essentially flat for five years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Pot, meet Mr. Kettle.</p>
<p>Oh, the irony. Microsoft gets its clock cleaned by Google yet again, and immediately whines to the Feds. </p>
<p>A pox on Ballmer&#8217;s house. With yet another instance of Microsoft&#8217;s inadequacies, it is no wonder that the stock price has been essentially flat for five years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Fights against the Google-DoubleClick Deal</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-says-not-so-fast-on-doubleclick-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-94261</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Fights against the Google-DoubleClick Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/16/microsoft-says-not-so-fast-on-doubleclick-deal/#comment-94261</guid>
		<description>[...] Source: Cybernetnews [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: Cybernetnews [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: natmaster</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/microsoft-says-not-so-fast-on-doubleclick-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-94259</link>
		<dc:creator>natmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/16/microsoft-says-not-so-fast-on-doubleclick-deal/#comment-94259</guid>
		<description>How does at&amp;t have the authority to accuse ANYONE of anti-trust? They&#039;re the largest monopoly actively corrupting our governments with their dirty bribes.

And if having 85% market share of something is considered monopolistic, I guess we&#039;ll finally get to rid ourselves of Microsoft and Apple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does at&amp;t have the authority to accuse ANYONE of anti-trust? They&#8217;re the largest monopoly actively corrupting our governments with their dirty bribes.</p>
<p>And if having 85% market share of something is considered monopolistic, I guess we&#8217;ll finally get to rid ourselves of Microsoft and Apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
