<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mozilla Gets Places Back in Firefox 3, Prepares for Tagging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-gets-places-back-in-firefox-3-prepares-for-tagging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-gets-places-back-in-firefox-3-prepares-for-tagging/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:26:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-gets-places-back-in-firefox-3-prepares-for-tagging/comment-page-1/#comment-96569</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 22:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/05/22/mozilla-gets-places-back-in-firefox-3-prepares-for-tagging/#comment-96569</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I just saw the post by Mozilla that said that. I don&#039;t think I would have noticed those changes though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I just saw the post by Mozilla that said that. I don&#8217;t think I would have noticed those changes though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: natmaster</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-gets-places-back-in-firefox-3-prepares-for-tagging/comment-page-1/#comment-96516</link>
		<dc:creator>natmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 02:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/05/22/mozilla-gets-places-back-in-firefox-3-prepares-for-tagging/#comment-96516</guid>
		<description>Actually, there are a few UI changes already, albeit minimal.

More here: http://wiki.mozilla.org/Places:List_of_UI_differences</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, there are a few UI changes already, albeit minimal.</p>
<p>More here: [<a href='http://wiki.mozilla.org/Places:List_of_UI_differences' rel='nofollow'>wiki.mozilla.org</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-gets-places-back-in-firefox-3-prepares-for-tagging/comment-page-1/#comment-96479</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 19:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/05/22/mozilla-gets-places-back-in-firefox-3-prepares-for-tagging/#comment-96479</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@xpgeek:&lt;/strong&gt; Tagging would mostly look like a folder system much like how &lt;a href=&quot;http://del.icio.us/help/firefox/extensionnew&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Del.icio.us handles it&lt;/a&gt; in the browser. The main benefit is that you can place the same bookmark under multiple tags, so that finding them is much easier later on. To do the same thing with bookmarks you would need to bookmark a site multiple times.

&lt;strong&gt;@Motang:&lt;/strong&gt; I guess Epiphany is based on the Gecko rendering that Firefox uses so that is understandable...kind of. :)

&lt;strong&gt;@nester007x:&lt;/strong&gt; No, the interface isn&#039;t back yet which is something I was expecting to see when trying it out. At first I didn&#039;t even think that it was running. Of course, they need to start somewhere and logically the backend makes sense.

As far as the duplicate bookmark checker goes, I don&#039;t think we&#039;ll see that feature included because that is more of something they would expect an extension to cover.

&lt;strong&gt;@Oropher:&lt;/strong&gt; It is definitely good to see Places starting to make its way back in. And you have thousands of bookmarks!?! Wow!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@xpgeek:</strong> Tagging would mostly look like a folder system much like how [<a href='http://del.icio.us/help/firefox/extensionnew' rel='nofollow'>del.icio.us</a>] in the browser. The main benefit is that you can place the same bookmark under multiple tags, so that finding them is much easier later on. To do the same thing with bookmarks you would need to bookmark a site multiple times.</p>
<p><strong>@Motang:</strong> I guess Epiphany is based on the Gecko rendering that Firefox uses so that is understandable&#8230;kind of. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><strong>@nester007x:</strong> No, the interface isn&#8217;t back yet which is something I was expecting to see when trying it out. At first I didn&#8217;t even think that it was running. Of course, they need to start somewhere and logically the backend makes sense.</p>
<p>As far as the duplicate bookmark checker goes, I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ll see that feature included because that is more of something they would expect an extension to cover.</p>
<p><strong>@Oropher:</strong> It is definitely good to see Places starting to make its way back in. And you have thousands of bookmarks!?! Wow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oropher</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-gets-places-back-in-firefox-3-prepares-for-tagging/comment-page-1/#comment-96466</link>
		<dc:creator>Oropher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 14:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/05/22/mozilla-gets-places-back-in-firefox-3-prepares-for-tagging/#comment-96466</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes! :D Fx3 just keeps getting better and better!&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s good to see Places starting to take shape, and on schedule, too - looks like they might actually be able to keep up with the schedule. :) &lt;br /&gt;
Won&#039;t be long before I have to sort my bookmarks out... I keep putting off going through several thousand of the things until I can use tags to replace all those folders and duplicates...&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding duplicate checking - with the move to SQLite, it does sound like something that ought to be under Tools-&gt;Options. But if not, there&#039;s always the &lt;a href=&quot;https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1553&quot;&gt;Bookmark Duplicate Detector&lt;/a&gt; extension, which should get more efficient under SQLite too.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  Fx3 just keeps getting better and better!<br />
It&#8217;s good to see Places starting to take shape, and on schedule, too &#8211; looks like they might actually be able to keep up with the schedule. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  <br />
Won&#8217;t be long before I have to sort my bookmarks out&#8230; I keep putting off going through several thousand of the things until I can use tags to replace all those folders and duplicates&#8230;<br />
Regarding duplicate checking &#8211; with the move to SQLite, it does sound like something that ought to be under Tools-&gt;Options. But if not, there&#8217;s always the [<a href='https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1553' rel='nofollow'>addons.mozilla.org</a>] extension, which should get more efficient under SQLite too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asroone &#187; Ø§Ù…Ø±ÙˆØ² Ø¯Ù†ÛŒØ§ÛŒ Ø§ÛŒÙ†ØªØ±Ù†Øª</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-gets-places-back-in-firefox-3-prepares-for-tagging/comment-page-1/#comment-96464</link>
		<dc:creator>Asroone &#187; Ø§Ù…Ø±ÙˆØ² Ø¯Ù†ÛŒØ§ÛŒ Ø§ÛŒÙ†ØªØ±Ù†Øª</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 13:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/05/22/mozilla-gets-places-back-in-firefox-3-prepares-for-tagging/#comment-96464</guid>
		<description>[...] Ù†Ú¯Ø§Ù‡ÙŠ Ø¨Ù‡ Ù†Ø³Ø®Ù‡ Ø§Ø¨ØªØ¯Ø§ÙŠÙŠ ÙØ§ÙŠØ±ÙØ§Ú©Ø³ Û³ Ø¢Ù„ÙØ§ Û¶ ( + [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ù†Ú¯Ø§Ù‡ÙŠ Ø¨Ù‡ Ù†Ø³Ø®Ù‡ Ø§Ø¨ØªØ¯Ø§ÙŠÙŠ ÙØ§ÙŠØ±ÙØ§Ú©Ø³ Û³ Ø¢Ù„ÙØ§ Û¶ ( + [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Motang</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-gets-places-back-in-firefox-3-prepares-for-tagging/comment-page-1/#comment-96449</link>
		<dc:creator>Motang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 02:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/05/22/mozilla-gets-places-back-in-firefox-3-prepares-for-tagging/#comment-96449</guid>
		<description>Oh I forgot to mention that the Places in FF3.0 seems very simialr to the one that is avaible in &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epiphany_(web_browser)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Epiphany browser&lt;/a&gt;.   :mrgreen:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I forgot to mention that the Places in FF3.0 seems very simialr to the one that is avaible in [<a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epiphany_' rel='nofollow'>en.wikipedia.org</a>](web_browser).   <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif' alt=':mrgreen:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: netster007x</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-gets-places-back-in-firefox-3-prepares-for-tagging/comment-page-1/#comment-96441</link>
		<dc:creator>netster007x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 22:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/05/22/mozilla-gets-places-back-in-firefox-3-prepares-for-tagging/#comment-96441</guid>
		<description>At first I though the real interface was back.  Reading on showed it&#039;s just background file changes.  Let me know when places is really back in it (although then it&#039;ll just be a feature limited UI at first).  I don&#039;t think tagging is all that great.  I like the last option best, because it doesn&#039;t add unnecessary clicks.  Also, that page drop-down menu from the URL bar looks pretty cool.  I like that more than tags.  Also, is Places going to have duplicate bookmark checking?  That would be very helpful.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first I though the real interface was back.  Reading on showed it&#8217;s just background file changes.  Let me know when places is really back in it (although then it&#8217;ll just be a feature limited UI at first).  I don&#8217;t think tagging is all that great.  I like the last option best, because it doesn&#8217;t add unnecessary clicks.  Also, that page drop-down menu from the URL bar looks pretty cool.  I like that more than tags.  Also, is Places going to have duplicate bookmark checking?  That would be very helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Motang</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-gets-places-back-in-firefox-3-prepares-for-tagging/comment-page-1/#comment-96431</link>
		<dc:creator>Motang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 20:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/05/22/mozilla-gets-places-back-in-firefox-3-prepares-for-tagging/#comment-96431</guid>
		<description>I am looking forward to this, hopefully it would be put in the final version.  As I know in FF 2.0 it was taken out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am looking forward to this, hopefully it would be put in the final version.  As I know in FF 2.0 it was taken out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xpgeek</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-gets-places-back-in-firefox-3-prepares-for-tagging/comment-page-1/#comment-96428</link>
		<dc:creator>xpgeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 20:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/05/22/mozilla-gets-places-back-in-firefox-3-prepares-for-tagging/#comment-96428</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure I &#039;get it&#039;. Is it like, tagging in Gmail?, where all mail is stored in one place essentially, tagged, n then you view the tags. Er, is it a total replacement to folders that works in the same way? If so, what benefit does it provide over the current folder system? Smaller bookmarks file size, faster, what? If none, then this just seems like yet another not very necessary extra feature to bloat it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I &#8216;get it&#8217;. Is it like, tagging in Gmail?, where all mail is stored in one place essentially, tagged, n then you view the tags. Er, is it a total replacement to folders that works in the same way? If so, what benefit does it provide over the current folder system? Smaller bookmarks file size, faster, what? If none, then this just seems like yet another not very necessary extra feature to bloat it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
