<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mozilla Lighting To Put Outlook In Its Grave?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-lighting-to-put-outlook-in-its-grave/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-lighting-to-put-outlook-in-its-grave/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:29:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-lighting-to-put-outlook-in-its-grave/comment-page-1/#comment-117400</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cybernetnews.com/?p=398#comment-117400</guid>
		<description>You may not think that the comparison is completely accurate, but I know several people that have switched from Outlook to using Lightning on Thunderbird. If users switch from one program to another it is inevitable that comparisons will be made, just like with Internet Explorer and Firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may not think that the comparison is completely accurate, but I know several people that have switched from Outlook to using Lightning on Thunderbird. If users switch from one program to another it is inevitable that comparisons will be made, just like with Internet Explorer and Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snane</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-lighting-to-put-outlook-in-its-grave/comment-page-1/#comment-117285</link>
		<dc:creator>Snane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 21:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cybernetnews.com/?p=398#comment-117285</guid>
		<description>What a ridiculous concept -- comparing Thunderbird + Lightning to Outlook.  What next: A comparison of MS Paint to Photoshop?!  They&#039;re world&#039;s apart -- not even intended for the same use!

Thunderbird is great, but, even with Lightning (which provides only really basic calendar integration at the moment), it&#039;s not a PIM.  Actually, that&#039;s exactly why I like it -- I don&#039;t need my email attached to my calendar, to-do list, notes, ...or anything else for that matter!  I just need my email.

If you want to do a realistic comparison, why not start with Thunderbird vs. Outlook Express, or the new (and actually very nice) WindowsMail (in Vista).  Then, for round 2, you could compare Sunbird to WindowsCalendar, or Rainlendar, or whatever other scheduling program you like.  

Let&#039;s keep it apples to apples.  That would be useful.

Snane</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a ridiculous concept &#8212; comparing Thunderbird + Lightning to Outlook.  What next: A comparison of MS Paint to Photoshop?!  They&#8217;re world&#8217;s apart &#8212; not even intended for the same use!</p>
<p>Thunderbird is great, but, even with Lightning (which provides only really basic calendar integration at the moment), it&#8217;s not a PIM.  Actually, that&#8217;s exactly why I like it &#8212; I don&#8217;t need my email attached to my calendar, to-do list, notes, &#8230;or anything else for that matter!  I just need my email.</p>
<p>If you want to do a realistic comparison, why not start with Thunderbird vs. Outlook Express, or the new (and actually very nice) WindowsMail (in Vista).  Then, for round 2, you could compare Sunbird to WindowsCalendar, or Rainlendar, or whatever other scheduling program you like.  </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s keep it apples to apples.  That would be useful.</p>
<p>Snane</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-lighting-to-put-outlook-in-its-grave/comment-page-1/#comment-95875</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 15:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cybernetnews.com/?p=398#comment-95875</guid>
		<description>Um, okay?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, okay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-lighting-to-put-outlook-in-its-grave/comment-page-1/#comment-95858</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 03:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cybernetnews.com/?p=398#comment-95858</guid>
		<description>Hey moron! This does not work on Exchange, therefore absolutely worthless in the real world!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey moron! This does not work on Exchange, therefore absolutely worthless in the real world!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
