<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Mozilla Prepares Automatic Updater For Firefox Users</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-prepares-automatic-updater-for-firefox-users/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-prepares-automatic-updater-for-firefox-users/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:40:50 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Inferno_str1ke</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-prepares-automatic-updater-for-firefox-users/#comment-24158</link> <dc:creator>Inferno_str1ke</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:02:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/22/mozilla-prepares-automatic-updater-for-firefox-users/#comment-24158</guid> <description>Yeh, 7MB, takes &lt;em&gt;hours&lt;/em&gt; :lol: I know people still on 1.0.x - it&#039;s not because they don&#039;t want the new versions, but because they don&#039;t know about them. I&#039;m very much liking the modern trend of being able to update your products - it&#039;s even better when you can set them to update in the background, because even though I wouldn&#039;t, it&#039;s good to set it when I install stuff on a person&#039;s PC that I know they&#039;ll never update.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeh, 7MB, takes <em>hours</em> <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /><br /> I know people still on 1.0.x &#8211; it&#8217;s not because they don&#8217;t want the new versions, but because they don&#8217;t know about them. I&#8217;m very much liking the modern trend of being able to update your products &#8211; it&#8217;s even better when you can set them to update in the background, because even though I wouldn&#8217;t, it&#8217;s good to set it when I install stuff on a person&#8217;s PC that I know they&#8217;ll never update.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Firefox Extension Guru's Blog</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-prepares-automatic-updater-for-firefox-users/#comment-23925</link> <dc:creator>Firefox Extension Guru's Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 16:09:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/22/mozilla-prepares-automatic-updater-for-firefox-users/#comment-23925</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Bon Echo 2.0mt2 Update...&lt;/strong&gt;Last night I was notified the next &#8216;major test&#8217; (mt) update was ready to download.  This was the full 7 MB download, not just a small update so it took a little longer.  But at least this update didn&#8217;t cause my incompatible extensions...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bon Echo 2.0mt2 Update&#8230;</strong></p><p>Last night I was notified the next &#8216;major test&#8217; (mt) update was ready to download.  This was the full 7 MB download, not just a small update so it took a little longer.  But at least this update didn&#8217;t cause my incompatible extensions&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pdedecker</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-prepares-automatic-updater-for-firefox-users/#comment-23916</link> <dc:creator>pdedecker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 07:18:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/22/mozilla-prepares-automatic-updater-for-firefox-users/#comment-23916</guid> <description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-23882&quot;&gt;Ryan wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The download is 7MB because you are essentially re-downloading ALL of Firefox...which is what people upgrading to a major version will have to do.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; What a bummer... :-(</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-23882">Ryan wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>The download is 7MB because you are essentially re-downloading ALL of Firefox&#8230;which is what people upgrading to a major version will have to do.</p></blockquote></div><p>What a bummer&#8230; <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-prepares-automatic-updater-for-firefox-users/#comment-23882</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 20:51:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/22/mozilla-prepares-automatic-updater-for-firefox-users/#comment-23882</guid> <description>The download is 7MB because you are essentially re-downloading ALL of Firefox...which is what people upgrading to a major version will have to do.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The download is 7MB because you are essentially re-downloading ALL of Firefox&#8230;which is what people upgrading to a major version will have to do.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-prepares-automatic-updater-for-firefox-users/#comment-23880</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 20:11:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/22/mozilla-prepares-automatic-updater-for-firefox-users/#comment-23880</guid> <description>I just checked for my nightly and this screen came up. The download was 7 mb!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just checked for my nightly and this screen came up. The download was 7 mb!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-prepares-automatic-updater-for-firefox-users/#comment-23879</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:56:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/22/mozilla-prepares-automatic-updater-for-firefox-users/#comment-23879</guid> <description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-23877&quot;&gt;SLA wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;What a COOL news for all system administrators! :D Now I can tell all the folks that they have to press [Get the new version] button, and they are up-to-date with their browsers all the time, forever!&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Assuming they have Firefox 1.5 installed, because Firefox 1.0.x don&#039;t have the updater.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-23877">SLA wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>What a COOL news for all system administrators! <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> Now I can tell all the folks that they have to press [Get the new version] button, and they are up-to-date with their browsers all the time, forever!</p></blockquote></div><p>Assuming they have Firefox 1.5 installed, because Firefox 1.0.x don&#8217;t have the updater.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Â¿Que miras? &#187; Archivo &#187; Actualizaciones automaticas en Firefox</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-prepares-automatic-updater-for-firefox-users/#comment-23878</link> <dc:creator>Â¿Que miras? &#187; Archivo &#187; Actualizaciones automaticas en Firefox</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:48:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/22/mozilla-prepares-automatic-updater-for-firefox-users/#comment-23878</guid> <description>[...] VÃ­a &#124; CyberNet Links relacionados [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VÃ­a | CyberNet Links relacionados [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SLA</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-prepares-automatic-updater-for-firefox-users/#comment-23877</link> <dc:creator>SLA</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:41:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/22/mozilla-prepares-automatic-updater-for-firefox-users/#comment-23877</guid> <description>What a COOL news for all system administrators! :D Now I can tell all the folks that they have to press [Get the new version] button, and they are up-to-date with their browsers all the time, forever!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a COOL news for all system administrators! <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> Now I can tell all the folks that they have to press [Get the new version] button, and they are up-to-date with their browsers all the time, forever!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-prepares-automatic-updater-for-firefox-users/#comment-23875</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:06:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/22/mozilla-prepares-automatic-updater-for-firefox-users/#comment-23875</guid> <description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-23874&quot;&gt;Nate The Great wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Now that&#039;s one license agreement i&#039;d be glad to accept! :)Also, is it just me or is it weird that only the &quot;T&quot; in NOT is underlined?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; It&#039;s a &quot;hotkey&quot; (or access key...I&#039;m having a brain cramp and can&#039;t remember what it&#039;s called). :)Just like how the &quot;c&quot; in &quot;accept&quot; is underlined.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-23874">Nate The Great wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Now that&#8217;s one license agreement i&#8217;d be glad to accept! <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Also, is it just me or is it weird that only the &#8220;T&#8221; in NOT is underlined?</p></blockquote></div><p>It&#8217;s a &#8220;hotkey&#8221; (or access key&#8230;I&#8217;m having a brain cramp and can&#8217;t remember what it&#8217;s called). <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Just like how the &#8220;c&#8221; in &#8220;accept&#8221; is underlined.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nate The Great</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-prepares-automatic-updater-for-firefox-users/#comment-23874</link> <dc:creator>Nate The Great</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:57:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/22/mozilla-prepares-automatic-updater-for-firefox-users/#comment-23874</guid> <description>Now that&#039;s one license agreement i&#039;d be glad to accept! :)Also, is it just me or is it weird that only the &quot;T&quot; in NOT is underlined?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that&#8217;s one license agreement i&#8217;d be glad to accept! <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Also, is it just me or is it weird that only the &#8220;T&#8221; in NOT is underlined?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 320/339 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-02-13 11:13:51 -->
