<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mozilla Releases Thunderbird 2.0 Beta 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-releases-thunderbird-20-beta-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-releases-thunderbird-20-beta-1/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:05:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SLA</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-releases-thunderbird-20-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-52000</link>
		<dc:creator>SLA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/12/mozilla-releases-thunderbird-20-beta-1/#comment-52000</guid>
		<description>Thunderbird is definitely a MUST-HAVE replacement for Outlook Express 6.
There is proprietary software, which is better than Thunderbird 2.0:

1) The BAT!
2) Outlook (from MS Office)
3) ...?

But Thunderbird is the BEST among FREE mailers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thunderbird is definitely a MUST-HAVE replacement for Outlook Express 6.<br />
There is proprietary software, which is better than Thunderbird 2.0:</p>
<p>1) The BAT!<br />
2) Outlook (from MS Office)<br />
3) &#8230;?</p>
<p>But Thunderbird is the BEST among FREE mailers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murphy</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-releases-thunderbird-20-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-51704</link>
		<dc:creator>Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/12/mozilla-releases-thunderbird-20-beta-1/#comment-51704</guid>
		<description>Nogg, if you search the Add-Ons site for Thunderbird, you will find a &lt;a href=&quot;https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/2110/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MinimizeToTray &lt;/a&gt;extension for both Firefox and Thunderbird. Hope that helps with your frustrations.

Thanks for the heads up Ryan. I&#039;ve always loved Thunderbird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nogg, if you search the Add-Ons site for Thunderbird, you will find a [<a href='https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/2110/extension' rel='nofollow'>addons.mozilla.org</a>] for both Firefox and Thunderbird. Hope that helps with your frustrations.</p>
<p>Thanks for the heads up Ryan. I&#8217;ve always loved Thunderbird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-releases-thunderbird-20-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-51656</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/12/mozilla-releases-thunderbird-20-beta-1/#comment-51656</guid>
		<description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-51650&quot;&gt;SLA wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;This post looks OK (not screwed up) for me. I&#039;m using Firefox 2.0 at 1280x960, and any window resizing doesn&#039;t screw it up.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I think it is because the right-side image and the left-side advertisement collide when the screen is 1024x768. I&#039;ll make the image a little smaller and then those people won&#039;t have that problem. If your window is a little wider then you wouldn&#039;t notice the problem.

&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-51650&quot;&gt;SLA wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;BTW, Ryan, make a pool about which e-mail application the folks are using. :)&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Ahh, good idea. I&#039;ll add it to the list that I already want to ask. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-51650">SLA wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>This post looks OK (not screwed up) for me. I&#8217;m using Firefox 2.0 at 1280&#215;960, and any window resizing doesn&#8217;t screw it up.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I think it is because the right-side image and the left-side advertisement collide when the screen is 1024&#215;768. I&#8217;ll make the image a little smaller and then those people won&#8217;t have that problem. If your window is a little wider then you wouldn&#8217;t notice the problem.</p>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-51650">SLA wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>BTW, Ryan, make a pool about which e-mail application the folks are using. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Ahh, good idea. I&#8217;ll add it to the list that I already want to ask. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SLA</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-releases-thunderbird-20-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-51650</link>
		<dc:creator>SLA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/12/mozilla-releases-thunderbird-20-beta-1/#comment-51650</guid>
		<description>This post looks OK (not screwed up) for me. I&#039;m using Firefox 2.0 at 1280x960, and any window resizing doesn&#039;t screw it up.

And I am Thunderbird user from pre-1.0 versions. I&#039;m using &quot;version 2 beta 1&quot; nightly builds for a long-long time, and it runs perfectly. Never had a single crash! :)

BTW, Ryan, make a pool about which e-mail application the folks are using. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post looks OK (not screwed up) for me. I&#8217;m using Firefox 2.0 at 1280&#215;960, and any window resizing doesn&#8217;t screw it up.</p>
<p>And I am Thunderbird user from pre-1.0 versions. I&#8217;m using &#8220;version 2 beta 1&#8243; nightly builds for a long-long time, and it runs perfectly. Never had a single crash! <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>BTW, Ryan, make a pool about which e-mail application the folks are using. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nogg3r5</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-releases-thunderbird-20-beta-1/comment-page-1/#comment-51624</link>
		<dc:creator>nogg3r5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/12/mozilla-releases-thunderbird-20-beta-1/#comment-51624</guid>
		<description>Ryan, this post is screwed up. I don&#039;t see the beginning of the first sentence. In Firefox at 1024x768.

Thunderbird always seems to be developed a little slower then Firefox, lets face it, which would you rather develop??

I think they need to add &quot;minimize to tray&quot; or some sort of mail checker for when the program is closed.

Not that I use Thunderbird, I&#039;m a gmail addict.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan, this post is screwed up. I don&#8217;t see the beginning of the first sentence. In Firefox at 1024&#215;768.</p>
<p>Thunderbird always seems to be developed a little slower then Firefox, lets face it, which would you rather develop??</p>
<p>I think they need to add &#8220;minimize to tray&#8221; or some sort of mail checker for when the program is closed.</p>
<p>Not that I use Thunderbird, I&#8217;m a gmail addict.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
