<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Mozilla Releases Thunderbird 2.0 Beta 1</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-releases-thunderbird-20-beta-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-releases-thunderbird-20-beta-1/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 02:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: SLA</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-releases-thunderbird-20-beta-1/#comment-52000</link> <dc:creator>SLA</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:13:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/12/mozilla-releases-thunderbird-20-beta-1/#comment-52000</guid> <description>Thunderbird is definitely a MUST-HAVE replacement for Outlook Express 6. There is proprietary software, which is better than Thunderbird 2.0:1) The BAT! 2) Outlook (from MS Office) 3) ...?But Thunderbird is the BEST among FREE mailers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thunderbird is definitely a MUST-HAVE replacement for Outlook Express 6.<br /> There is proprietary software, which is better than Thunderbird 2.0:</p><p>1) The BAT!<br /> 2) Outlook (from MS Office)<br /> 3) &#8230;?</p><p>But Thunderbird is the BEST among FREE mailers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Murphy</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-releases-thunderbird-20-beta-1/#comment-51704</link> <dc:creator>Murphy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:53:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/12/mozilla-releases-thunderbird-20-beta-1/#comment-51704</guid> <description>Nogg, if you search the Add-Ons site for Thunderbird, you will find a &lt;a href=&quot;https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/2110/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MinimizeToTray &lt;/a&gt;extension for both Firefox and Thunderbird. Hope that helps with your frustrations.Thanks for the heads up Ryan. I&#039;ve always loved Thunderbird.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nogg, if you search the Add-Ons site for Thunderbird, you will find a [<a href='https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/2110/extension' rel='nofollow'>addons.mozilla.org</a>] for both Firefox and Thunderbird. Hope that helps with your frustrations.</p><p>Thanks for the heads up Ryan. I&#8217;ve always loved Thunderbird.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-releases-thunderbird-20-beta-1/#comment-51656</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:43:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/12/mozilla-releases-thunderbird-20-beta-1/#comment-51656</guid> <description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-51650&quot;&gt;SLA wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;This post looks OK (not screwed up) for me. I&#039;m using Firefox 2.0 at 1280x960, and any window resizing doesn&#039;t screw it up.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; I think it is because the right-side image and the left-side advertisement collide when the screen is 1024x768. I&#039;ll make the image a little smaller and then those people won&#039;t have that problem. If your window is a little wider then you wouldn&#039;t notice the problem.&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-51650&quot;&gt;SLA wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;BTW, Ryan, make a pool about which e-mail application the folks are using. :)&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Ahh, good idea. I&#039;ll add it to the list that I already want to ask. ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-51650">SLA wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>This post looks OK (not screwed up) for me. I&#8217;m using Firefox 2.0 at 1280&#215;960, and any window resizing doesn&#8217;t screw it up.</p></blockquote></div><p>I think it is because the right-side image and the left-side advertisement collide when the screen is 1024&#215;768. I&#8217;ll make the image a little smaller and then those people won&#8217;t have that problem. If your window is a little wider then you wouldn&#8217;t notice the problem.</p><div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-51650">SLA wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>BTW, Ryan, make a pool about which e-mail application the folks are using. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p></blockquote></div><p>Ahh, good idea. I&#8217;ll add it to the list that I already want to ask. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SLA</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-releases-thunderbird-20-beta-1/#comment-51650</link> <dc:creator>SLA</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:50:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/12/mozilla-releases-thunderbird-20-beta-1/#comment-51650</guid> <description>This post looks OK (not screwed up) for me. I&#039;m using Firefox 2.0 at 1280x960, and any window resizing doesn&#039;t screw it up.And I am Thunderbird user from pre-1.0 versions. I&#039;m using &quot;version 2 beta 1&quot; nightly builds for a long-long time, and it runs perfectly. Never had a single crash! :)BTW, Ryan, make a pool about which e-mail application the folks are using. :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post looks OK (not screwed up) for me. I&#8217;m using Firefox 2.0 at 1280&#215;960, and any window resizing doesn&#8217;t screw it up.</p><p>And I am Thunderbird user from pre-1.0 versions. I&#8217;m using &#8220;version 2 beta 1&#8243; nightly builds for a long-long time, and it runs perfectly. Never had a single crash! <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>BTW, Ryan, make a pool about which e-mail application the folks are using. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nogg3r5</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/mozilla-releases-thunderbird-20-beta-1/#comment-51624</link> <dc:creator>nogg3r5</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:45:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/12/12/mozilla-releases-thunderbird-20-beta-1/#comment-51624</guid> <description>Ryan, this post is screwed up. I don&#039;t see the beginning of the first sentence. In Firefox at 1024x768.Thunderbird always seems to be developed a little slower then Firefox, lets face it, which would you rather develop??I think they need to add &quot;minimize to tray&quot; or some sort of mail checker for when the program is closed.Not that I use Thunderbird, I&#039;m a gmail addict.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan, this post is screwed up. I don&#8217;t see the beginning of the first sentence. In Firefox at 1024&#215;768.</p><p>Thunderbird always seems to be developed a little slower then Firefox, lets face it, which would you rather develop??</p><p>I think they need to add &#8220;minimize to tray&#8221; or some sort of mail checker for when the program is closed.</p><p>Not that I use Thunderbird, I&#8217;m a gmail addict.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 259/280 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-27 04:20:16 -->
