<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Multiple IM Support Coming to Google?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/multiple-im-support-coming-to-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/multiple-im-support-coming-to-google/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:57:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/multiple-im-support-coming-to-google/comment-page-1/#comment-121206</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/31/multiple-im-support-coming-to-google/#comment-121206</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-121105&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lashiec wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Actually, as Google Talk uses Jabber, I always wondered why they didn’t add support for transports in the first release. Well, at least it was possible to use GMail addresses in MSN Messenger :)&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Google Talk&#039;s market share has been so extremely small that they almost have to add support for other networks if they want it to be successful. This will surely help.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-121107&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tinhed wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;This was a much needed feature after the integration of yahoo and windows IM. let us see how long does it take to be fully implemented.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Normally when we see features like this in the code it means the new things are right around the corner. I would give it two or three weeks and I&#039;m sure we&#039;ll see some sort of announcement.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-121160&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;yeshu wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&lt;/a&gt;

u can click on the link i have given and u will be logging on to the new gmail 2.0

it worked for me…&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I&#039;ve tried that, and unfortunately it doesn&#039;t work for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-121105" rel="nofollow">Lashiec wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Actually, as Google Talk uses Jabber, I always wondered why they didn’t add support for transports in the first release. Well, at least it was possible to use GMail addresses in MSN Messenger <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Google Talk&#8217;s market share has been so extremely small that they almost have to add support for other networks if they want it to be successful. This will surely help.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-121107" rel="nofollow">Tinhed wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>This was a much needed feature after the integration of yahoo and windows IM. let us see how long does it take to be fully implemented.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Normally when we see features like this in the code it means the new things are right around the corner. I would give it two or three weeks and I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll see some sort of announcement.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-121160" rel="nofollow">yeshu wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>[<a href='https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2' rel='nofollow'>mail.google.com</a>]</p>
<p>u can click on the link i have given and u will be logging on to the new gmail 2.0</p>
<p>it worked for me…</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried that, and unfortunately it doesn&#8217;t work for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yeshu</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/multiple-im-support-coming-to-google/comment-page-1/#comment-121160</link>
		<dc:creator>yeshu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 08:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/31/multiple-im-support-coming-to-google/#comment-121160</guid>
		<description>https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2

u can click on the link i have given and u will be logging on to the new gmail 2.0

it worked for me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[<a href='https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2' rel='nofollow'>mail.google.com</a>]</p>
<p>u can click on the link i have given and u will be logging on to the new gmail 2.0</p>
<p>it worked for me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: netster007x</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/multiple-im-support-coming-to-google/comment-page-1/#comment-121136</link>
		<dc:creator>netster007x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/31/multiple-im-support-coming-to-google/#comment-121136</guid>
		<description>I want that for Y!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want that for Y!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tinhed</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/multiple-im-support-coming-to-google/comment-page-1/#comment-121107</link>
		<dc:creator>Tinhed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/31/multiple-im-support-coming-to-google/#comment-121107</guid>
		<description>This was a much needed feature after the integration of yahoo and windows IM. let us see how long does it take to be fully implemented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a much needed feature after the integration of yahoo and windows IM. let us see how long does it take to be fully implemented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lashiec</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/multiple-im-support-coming-to-google/comment-page-1/#comment-121105</link>
		<dc:creator>Lashiec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/31/multiple-im-support-coming-to-google/#comment-121105</guid>
		<description>Actually, as Google Talk uses Jabber, I always wondered why they didn&#039;t add support for transports in the first release. Well, at least it was possible to use GMail addresses in MSN Messenger :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, as Google Talk uses Jabber, I always wondered why they didn&#8217;t add support for transports in the first release. Well, at least it was possible to use GMail addresses in MSN Messenger <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
