<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Need an iPhone Relocker for your iBrick?</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/need-an-iphone-relocker-for-your-ibrick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/need-an-iphone-relocker-for-your-ibrick/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:03:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/need-an-iphone-relocker-for-your-ibrick/#comment-116485</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 03:31:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/28/need-an-iphone-relocker-for-your-ibrick/#comment-116485</guid> <description>I heard that some of the iPhone unlockers were unaffected by the upgrades, so I don&#039;t think everyone got screwed *this* time around.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard that some of the iPhone unlockers were unaffected by the upgrades, so I don&#8217;t think everyone got screwed *this* time around.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Inferno_str1ke</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/need-an-iphone-relocker-for-your-ibrick/#comment-116470</link> <dc:creator>Inferno_str1ke</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:05:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/28/need-an-iphone-relocker-for-your-ibrick/#comment-116470</guid> <description>Apple said that the updates weren&#039;t intended to be malicious against those that had unlocked, yet people who haven&#039;t have reported it breaking their phones - so basically they&#039;ve gone and been malicious to the point of over stepping the boundaries and killing lots of phones at the same time. Petty tbh.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple said that the updates weren&#8217;t intended to be malicious against those that had unlocked, yet people who haven&#8217;t have reported it breaking their phones &#8211; so basically they&#8217;ve gone and been malicious to the point of over stepping the boundaries and killing lots of phones at the same time. Petty tbh.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ashley</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/need-an-iphone-relocker-for-your-ibrick/#comment-116432</link> <dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:13:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/28/need-an-iphone-relocker-for-your-ibrick/#comment-116432</guid> <description>I&#039;m sure that&#039;s ultimately the goal of those who created the software to unlock the phones originally - but at this point, I&#039;m not sure. If anybody knows, feel free to chime in...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure that&#8217;s ultimately the goal of those who created the software to unlock the phones originally &#8211; but at this point, I&#8217;m not sure. If anybody knows, feel free to chime in&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CoryC</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/need-an-iphone-relocker-for-your-ibrick/#comment-116423</link> <dc:creator>CoryC</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 16:45:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/28/need-an-iphone-relocker-for-your-ibrick/#comment-116423</guid> <description>So will users be able to re-lock, update, then unlock again?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So will users be able to re-lock, update, then unlock again?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 226/245 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-02-13 06:21:19 -->
