<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Need an iPhone Relocker for your iBrick?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/need-an-iphone-relocker-for-your-ibrick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/need-an-iphone-relocker-for-your-ibrick/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:26:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/need-an-iphone-relocker-for-your-ibrick/comment-page-1/#comment-116485</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 03:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/28/need-an-iphone-relocker-for-your-ibrick/#comment-116485</guid>
		<description>I heard that some of the iPhone unlockers were unaffected by the upgrades, so I don&#039;t think everyone got screwed *this* time around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard that some of the iPhone unlockers were unaffected by the upgrades, so I don&#8217;t think everyone got screwed *this* time around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inferno_str1ke</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/need-an-iphone-relocker-for-your-ibrick/comment-page-1/#comment-116470</link>
		<dc:creator>Inferno_str1ke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/28/need-an-iphone-relocker-for-your-ibrick/#comment-116470</guid>
		<description>Apple said that the updates weren&#039;t intended to be malicious against those that had unlocked, yet people who haven&#039;t have reported it breaking their phones - so basically they&#039;ve gone and been malicious to the point of over stepping the boundaries and killing lots of phones at the same time. Petty tbh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple said that the updates weren&#8217;t intended to be malicious against those that had unlocked, yet people who haven&#8217;t have reported it breaking their phones &#8211; so basically they&#8217;ve gone and been malicious to the point of over stepping the boundaries and killing lots of phones at the same time. Petty tbh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/need-an-iphone-relocker-for-your-ibrick/comment-page-1/#comment-116432</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/28/need-an-iphone-relocker-for-your-ibrick/#comment-116432</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure that&#039;s ultimately the goal of those who created the software to unlock the phones originally - but at this point, I&#039;m not sure. If anybody knows, feel free to chime in...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure that&#8217;s ultimately the goal of those who created the software to unlock the phones originally &#8211; but at this point, I&#8217;m not sure. If anybody knows, feel free to chime in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoryC</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/need-an-iphone-relocker-for-your-ibrick/comment-page-1/#comment-116423</link>
		<dc:creator>CoryC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 16:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/28/need-an-iphone-relocker-for-your-ibrick/#comment-116423</guid>
		<description>So will users be able to re-lock, update, then unlock again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So will users be able to re-lock, update, then unlock again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
