<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: New Feature For Google Talk: Offline Messages!</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 02:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31534</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 13:00:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/01/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31534</guid> <description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-31442&quot;&gt;netster007x wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;BTW did you notice Gmail&#039;s dead?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Gmail typically only goes down for a specific set of accounts at one time. For instance, if I have troubles accessing my email my friends probably won&#039;t. It is probably all dependent at what data center your email account is located at. The outages normally don&#039;t last more than 15 minutes from what I have experienced, but it always happens when you need it. :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-31442">netster007x wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>BTW did you notice Gmail&#8217;s dead?</p></blockquote></div><p>Gmail typically only goes down for a specific set of accounts at one time. For instance, if I have troubles accessing my email my friends probably won&#8217;t. It is probably all dependent at what data center your email account is located at. The outages normally don&#8217;t last more than 15 minutes from what I have experienced, but it always happens when you need it. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: netster007x</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31442</link> <dc:creator>netster007x</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 07:24:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/01/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31442</guid> <description>Yahoo! Messenger has had this for years!!!In Y!, when someone is offline just IM as if they&#039;re there and when they return they&#039;ll see &quot;Offline Messages&quot; (even if message archiving is turned off).  If you&#039;ve got a mic, you can even call and leave free voice-mail.Why Y! messenger is largely ignored, I have yet to figure out.  For me, Yahoo! has the best everything.RE the cross-compatibility between Google talk, aim, and Y!...  Yahoo! is compatible with Windows Live msgr, so it&#039;s certainly a possible feature if the co&#039;s work together on it.BTW did you notice Gmail&#039;s dead?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo! Messenger has had this for years!!!</p><p>In Y!, when someone is offline just IM as if they&#8217;re there and when they return they&#8217;ll see &#8220;Offline Messages&#8221; (even if message archiving is turned off).  If you&#8217;ve got a mic, you can even call and leave free voice-mail.</p><p>Why Y! messenger is largely ignored, I have yet to figure out.  For me, Yahoo! has the best everything.</p><p>RE the cross-compatibility between Google talk, aim, and Y!&#8230;  Yahoo! is compatible with Windows Live msgr, so it&#8217;s certainly a possible feature if the co&#8217;s work together on it.</p><p>BTW did you notice Gmail&#8217;s dead?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31288</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 21:55:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/01/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31288</guid> <description>I am sure that is a feature they are actively working on, since they say they are &lt;a href=&quot;http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/08/22/google-starts-working-on-new-google-talk-features/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;working on the top requested features&lt;/a&gt;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sure that is a feature they are actively working on, since they say they are [<a href='http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/08/22/google-starts-working-on-new-google-talk-features/.' rel='nofollow'>tech.cybernetnews.com</a>]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: www.yunar.com</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31286</link> <dc:creator>www.yunar.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 21:54:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/01/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31286</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Google Talk rolling out a new feature: Offline Messages...&lt;/strong&gt;Google has apparently added the ability to send offline messages to Google Talk users....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google Talk rolling out a new feature: Offline Messages&#8230;</strong></p><p>Google has apparently added the ability to send offline messages to Google Talk users&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31263</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 21:13:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/01/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31263</guid> <description>when will it be able to connect to aim, yahoo, etc???</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when will it be able to connect to aim, yahoo, etc???</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31211</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:20:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/01/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31211</guid> <description>I didn&#039;t know about Skype and ICQ, but I could have sworn that WLM didn&#039;t have the offline messaging feature.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know about Skype and ICQ, but I could have sworn that WLM didn&#8217;t have the offline messaging feature.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dean</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31206</link> <dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:01:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/01/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31206</guid> <description>I&#039;ve seen the offline message feature in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skype.com/intl/en-gb/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Skype&lt;/a&gt; too.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen the offline message feature in [<a href='http://www.skype.com/intl/en-gb/' rel='nofollow'>skype.com</a>] too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marlun</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31187</link> <dc:creator>Marlun</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 16:37:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/01/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31187</guid> <description>ICQ have had this feature for as long as I can remember.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ICQ have had this feature for as long as I can remember.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: wipeout140</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31186</link> <dc:creator>wipeout140</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 16:34:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/01/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31186</guid> <description>I know windows live messenger haves had off-line Messaging for along time and I think it was put WLM 8.0</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know windows live messenger haves had off-line Messaging for along time and I think it was put WLM 8.0</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 291/312 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-27 03:31:41 -->
