<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Feature For Google Talk: Offline Messages!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:26:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-31534</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 13:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/01/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31534</guid>
		<description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-31442&quot;&gt;netster007x wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;BTW did you notice Gmail&#039;s dead?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Gmail typically only goes down for a specific set of accounts at one time. For instance, if I have troubles accessing my email my friends probably won&#039;t. It is probably all dependent at what data center your email account is located at. The outages normally don&#039;t last more than 15 minutes from what I have experienced, but it always happens when you need it. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-31442">netster007x wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>BTW did you notice Gmail&#8217;s dead?</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Gmail typically only goes down for a specific set of accounts at one time. For instance, if I have troubles accessing my email my friends probably won&#8217;t. It is probably all dependent at what data center your email account is located at. The outages normally don&#8217;t last more than 15 minutes from what I have experienced, but it always happens when you need it. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: netster007x</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-31442</link>
		<dc:creator>netster007x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 07:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/01/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31442</guid>
		<description>Yahoo! Messenger has had this for years!!!

In Y!, when someone is offline just IM as if they&#039;re there and when they return they&#039;ll see &quot;Offline Messages&quot; (even if message archiving is turned off).  If you&#039;ve got a mic, you can even call and leave free voice-mail.

Why Y! messenger is largely ignored, I have yet to figure out.  For me, Yahoo! has the best everything.


RE the cross-compatibility between Google talk, aim, and Y!...  Yahoo! is compatible with Windows Live msgr, so it&#039;s certainly a possible feature if the co&#039;s work together on it.

BTW did you notice Gmail&#039;s dead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo! Messenger has had this for years!!!</p>
<p>In Y!, when someone is offline just IM as if they&#8217;re there and when they return they&#8217;ll see &#8220;Offline Messages&#8221; (even if message archiving is turned off).  If you&#8217;ve got a mic, you can even call and leave free voice-mail.</p>
<p>Why Y! messenger is largely ignored, I have yet to figure out.  For me, Yahoo! has the best everything.</p>
<p>RE the cross-compatibility between Google talk, aim, and Y!&#8230;  Yahoo! is compatible with Windows Live msgr, so it&#8217;s certainly a possible feature if the co&#8217;s work together on it.</p>
<p>BTW did you notice Gmail&#8217;s dead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-31288</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 21:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/01/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31288</guid>
		<description>I am sure that is a feature they are actively working on, since they say they are &lt;a href=&quot;http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/08/22/google-starts-working-on-new-google-talk-features/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;working on the top requested features&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sure that is a feature they are actively working on, since they say they are [<a href='http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/08/22/google-starts-working-on-new-google-talk-features/.' rel='nofollow'>tech.cybernetnews.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.yunar.com</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-31286</link>
		<dc:creator>www.yunar.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 21:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/01/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31286</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google Talk rolling out a new feature: Offline Messages...&lt;/strong&gt;

Google has apparently added the ability to send offline messages to Google Talk users....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google Talk rolling out a new feature: Offline Messages&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Google has apparently added the ability to send offline messages to Google Talk users&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-31263</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 21:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/01/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31263</guid>
		<description>when will it be able to connect to aim, yahoo, etc???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when will it be able to connect to aim, yahoo, etc???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-31211</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/01/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31211</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t know about Skype and ICQ, but I could have sworn that WLM didn&#039;t have the offline messaging feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know about Skype and ICQ, but I could have sworn that WLM didn&#8217;t have the offline messaging feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-31206</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/01/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31206</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen the offline message feature in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skype.com/intl/en-gb/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Skype&lt;/a&gt; too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen the offline message feature in [<a href='http://www.skype.com/intl/en-gb/' rel='nofollow'>skype.com</a>] too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marlun</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-31187</link>
		<dc:creator>Marlun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 16:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/01/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31187</guid>
		<description>ICQ have had this feature for as long as I can remember.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ICQ have had this feature for as long as I can remember.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wipeout140</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-31186</link>
		<dc:creator>wipeout140</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 16:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/01/new-feature-for-google-talk-offline-messages/#comment-31186</guid>
		<description>I know windows live messenger haves had off-line Messaging for along time and I think it was put WLM 8.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know windows live messenger haves had off-line Messaging for along time and I think it was put WLM 8.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
