<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Google Desktop Is Compatible With Vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/new-google-desktop-is-compatible-with-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/new-google-desktop-is-compatible-with-vista/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:18:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/new-google-desktop-is-compatible-with-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-37105</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 07:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/14/new-google-desktop-is-compatible-with-vista/#comment-37105</guid>
		<description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-36992&quot;&gt;MetaMan wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;What would be cool would be if they could make a Vista-specific version that taps into Vista&#039;s built-in search for the search component and taps into the sidebar for most of the sidebar stuff, making it more of an extension than a replacement.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
That is an amazing idea and I agree with you 100% that is what they should do. Unfortunately they would probably view that as &quot;throwing in the towel&quot; because they are using Microsoft&#039;s search. I would probably install Google&#039;s sidebar if it was integrated with Vista&#039;s search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-36992">MetaMan wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>What would be cool would be if they could make a Vista-specific version that taps into Vista&#8217;s built-in search for the search component and taps into the sidebar for most of the sidebar stuff, making it more of an extension than a replacement.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>That is an amazing idea and I agree with you 100% that is what they should do. Unfortunately they would probably view that as &#8220;throwing in the towel&#8221; because they are using Microsoft&#8217;s search. I would probably install Google&#8217;s sidebar if it was integrated with Vista&#8217;s search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/new-google-desktop-is-compatible-with-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-37068</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 04:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/14/new-google-desktop-is-compatible-with-vista/#comment-37068</guid>
		<description>I got ya! Good idea!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got ya! Good idea!  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MetaMan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/new-google-desktop-is-compatible-with-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-37024</link>
		<dc:creator>MetaMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 02:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/14/new-google-desktop-is-compatible-with-vista/#comment-37024</guid>
		<description>What I was saying was that they could use the basic framework of the sidebar, and add compatibility for Google services, Google sidebar widgets, etc.  This would make the software size smaller and possibly improve performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I was saying was that they could use the basic framework of the sidebar, and add compatibility for Google services, Google sidebar widgets, etc.  This would make the software size smaller and possibly improve performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/new-google-desktop-is-compatible-with-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-37019</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 01:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/14/new-google-desktop-is-compatible-with-vista/#comment-37019</guid>
		<description>The one good feature about the Google Sidebar is the ability to  have instant access to your Google Services (calendar, gtalk, gmail, etc.)

I haven&#039;t used Vista yet, but I&#039;m assuming you don&#039;t have access to your Google Services from their sidebar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one good feature about the Google Sidebar is the ability to  have instant access to your Google Services (calendar, gtalk, gmail, etc.)</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t used Vista yet, but I&#8217;m assuming you don&#8217;t have access to your Google Services from their sidebar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MetaMan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/new-google-desktop-is-compatible-with-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-36992</link>
		<dc:creator>MetaMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/11/14/new-google-desktop-is-compatible-with-vista/#comment-36992</guid>
		<description>What would be cool would be if they could make a Vista-specific version that taps into Vista&#039;s built-in search for the search component and taps into the sidebar for most of the sidebar stuff, making it more of an extension than a replacement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would be cool would be if they could make a Vista-specific version that taps into Vista&#8217;s built-in search for the search component and taps into the sidebar for most of the sidebar stuff, making it more of an extension than a replacement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
