Comments on: NOD32 3.0 & Smart Security Coming Monday

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 08 Nov 2007 07:32:14 +0000

I am partially wrong, they did add anti-spam into the suite.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 08 Nov 2007 07:31:20 +0000

Norton antivirus isn’t “terrible,” it has excellent detection, but it is much slower than NOD32. Actually, only Avira comes to mind if you want to be on par with the speed of NOD32. NOD32 continues to be a great product, but the ESS suite is just NOD32 with a firewall thrown in, no behavior blocker or ad blocking, or anything like that – but it is sticll good at what it does.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:18:59 +0000

Will be interesting to see if they can keep it lightweight and not make it bloated inspite of making it a “suite”.

By: yeshu

yeshu — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:28:23 +0000

uses about 30mb RAM

By: yeshu

yeshu — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:27:57 +0000

NOD32 ESET Smart Security 3.0.551.0 final

[rapidshare.com]

patch:

[rapidshare.com]
enjoy..

By: spock1982

spock1982 — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 23:42:34 +0000

I must agree with Ryan that the price is steep compared to alternatives such as Avast! It uses few resources and does not slow your system down and of course the price is right.

By: rogoisu

rogoisu — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:10:25 +0000

Definitely agree. Nod32’s lack of resource hording is awesome

By: Amak

Amak — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:06:05 +0000

I agree with Cory, and to add: Norton grinds any pc to a halt, but nod32 barely puts a dent in resources.

By: CoryC

CoryC — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:52:24 +0000

$60 for a complete suite that actually works is well worth the money and is in no way steep. Especially, when you consider that Norton charges $70.00 and their anti-virus is terrible.

It’s is more expensive than using 3 separate free utilities but $60 is still a fare price.