<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Office 2003 and Office 2007 Toolbar/Ribbon Size Comparison</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/office-2003-and-office-2007-toolbarribbon-size-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/office-2003-and-office-2007-toolbarribbon-size-comparison/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:40:50 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Staci</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/office-2003-and-office-2007-toolbarribbon-size-comparison/#comment-152250</link> <dc:creator>Staci</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 16:00:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/25/office-2003-and-office-2007-toolbarribbon-size-comparison/#comment-152250</guid> <description>I would love for the Ribbon to be SMALLER.  It&#039;s huge and makes me feel like I have less working space.  I like your idea!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love for the Ribbon to be SMALLER.  It&#8217;s huge and makes me feel like I have less working space.  I like your idea!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/office-2003-and-office-2007-toolbarribbon-size-comparison/#comment-149178</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:05:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/25/office-2003-and-office-2007-toolbarribbon-size-comparison/#comment-149178</guid> <description>For one it&#039;s simple for users, and two no spam bots have tried to take advantage of it. Until that day comes I&#039;ll stick with this solution.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For one it&#8217;s simple for users, and two no spam bots have tried to take advantage of it. Until that day comes I&#8217;ll stick with this solution.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chaim</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/office-2003-and-office-2007-toolbarribbon-size-comparison/#comment-149165</link> <dc:creator>Chaim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:47:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/25/office-2003-and-office-2007-toolbarribbon-size-comparison/#comment-149165</guid> <description>By the way, the spam box on this comment form doesn&#039;t seem very useful because besides being easy to read for any computer, its text and written in the source code. Whats the point of it?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, the spam box on this comment form doesn&#8217;t seem very useful because besides being easy to read for any computer, its text and written in the source code. Whats the point of it?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chaim</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/office-2003-and-office-2007-toolbarribbon-size-comparison/#comment-149164</link> <dc:creator>Chaim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:44:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/25/office-2003-and-office-2007-toolbarribbon-size-comparison/#comment-149164</guid> <description>Now that people are beginning to purchase Netbooks, screen size is once again becoming a issue. Maybe soon they will develop a laptop that&#039;s small and light but has a big screen?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that people are beginning to purchase Netbooks, screen size is once again becoming a issue. Maybe soon they will develop a laptop that&#8217;s small and light but has a big screen?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/office-2003-and-office-2007-toolbarribbon-size-comparison/#comment-147603</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:54:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/25/office-2003-and-office-2007-toolbarribbon-size-comparison/#comment-147603</guid> <description>Hi allIs there any way in which the Tabs/buttons on the 2007 Ribbon can be changed to bigger/bolder size? Like in Office 2003 the toolbar could be enlarged through Windows XP. Is it possible to do the same to the Ribbons through Vista, or is there another way?Thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all</p><p>Is there any way in which the Tabs/buttons on the 2007 Ribbon can be changed to bigger/bolder size?<br /> Like in Office 2003 the toolbar could be enlarged through Windows XP.<br /> Is it possible to do the same to the Ribbons through Vista, or is there another way?</p><p>Thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/office-2003-and-office-2007-toolbarribbon-size-comparison/#comment-25631</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 04:46:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/25/office-2003-and-office-2007-toolbarribbon-size-comparison/#comment-25631</guid> <description>The massive menu bar (aka &quot;ribbon bar&quot;) is for Ads and things like a &quot;live&quot; search box.Efficiently speaking, only when the screen is larger than 1024x768 does a massive menu bar make sense - but NOT at the top of the screen.  On 19&quot; LCD and larger there is always more room on the left or right side - that is where a massive menu bar should be located - closer to where you are working on the screen.  But the massive menu bar is not moveable!So why does M$ not allow the massive bar to be moved?  Be cause M$ wants the eyeball space at the top of the screen for ads, plain and simple.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The massive menu bar (aka &#8220;ribbon bar&#8221;) is for Ads and things like a &#8220;live&#8221; search box.</p><p>Efficiently speaking, only when the screen is larger than 1024&#215;768 does a massive menu bar make sense &#8211; but NOT at the top of the screen.  On 19&#8243; LCD and larger there is always more room on the left or right side &#8211; that is where a massive menu bar should be located &#8211; closer to where you are working on the screen.  But the massive menu bar is not moveable!</p><p>So why does M$ not allow the massive bar to be moved?  Be cause M$ wants the eyeball space at the top of the screen for ads, plain and simple.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Radu Capan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/office-2003-and-office-2007-toolbarribbon-size-comparison/#comment-24384</link> <dc:creator>Radu Capan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:10:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/25/office-2003-and-office-2007-toolbarribbon-size-comparison/#comment-24384</guid> <description>I think the size issue is relevant only for computers with small resolution. In my case, I have plenty of space, even with a double-size ribbon. Sooner or later, 99% of computer will have higher resolution that 1024x768, so ribbon will be no problem at all.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the size issue is relevant only for computers with small resolution. In my case, I have plenty of space, even with a double-size ribbon. Sooner or later, 99% of computer will have higher resolution that 1024&#215;768, so ribbon will be no problem at all.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: OldManDeath</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/office-2003-and-office-2007-toolbarribbon-size-comparison/#comment-24381</link> <dc:creator>OldManDeath</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:02:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/25/office-2003-and-office-2007-toolbarribbon-size-comparison/#comment-24381</guid> <description>I think it is awesome as well.  The UI differences are big, but better.  Will take a little time for me to find where everything is now.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is awesome as well.  The UI differences are big, but better.  Will take a little time for me to find where everything is now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Daniel</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/office-2003-and-office-2007-toolbarribbon-size-comparison/#comment-24372</link> <dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:40:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/25/office-2003-and-office-2007-toolbarribbon-size-comparison/#comment-24372</guid> <description>I personally love the new ribbon and would never conisder  going back.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally love the new ribbon and would never conisder  going back.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 281/300 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-02-13 11:07:03 -->
