<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Offline Version Of Google&#8217;s New Docs &amp; Spreadsheets?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/offline-version-of-googles-new-docs-spreadsheets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/offline-version-of-googles-new-docs-spreadsheets/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:26:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/offline-version-of-googles-new-docs-spreadsheets/comment-page-1/#comment-26418</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/11/offline-version-of-googles-new-docs-spreadsheets/#comment-26418</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure that they would make it upload directly to the Google Docs servers and probably even synchronize the two if you desire. The stuff that Garett often finds in the code has a high tendency to show up a little bit down the road. The only question is how far down the road. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure that they would make it upload directly to the Google Docs servers and probably even synchronize the two if you desire. The stuff that Garett often finds in the code has a high tendency to show up a little bit down the road. The only question is how far down the road. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shirizaki</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/offline-version-of-googles-new-docs-spreadsheets/comment-page-1/#comment-26417</link>
		<dc:creator>shirizaki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/11/offline-version-of-googles-new-docs-spreadsheets/#comment-26417</guid>
		<description>They might, but I&#039;d chalk this up to when people looked at the latest iTunes code and got all hard on the pants because some code said the word &quot;phone&quot; in it. Simple code that some writer put in to throw people off or as a feature that never panned out.

If they did release something like it, I don&#039;t think it would pan out (unless it could upload directly to the docs servers). There&#039;s openoffice, and that pretty much fills the needs of any MS office alternatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They might, but I&#8217;d chalk this up to when people looked at the latest iTunes code and got all hard on the pants because some code said the word &#8220;phone&#8221; in it. Simple code that some writer put in to throw people off or as a feature that never panned out.</p>
<p>If they did release something like it, I don&#8217;t think it would pan out (unless it could upload directly to the docs servers). There&#8217;s openoffice, and that pretty much fills the needs of any MS office alternatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
