<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online Photoshop Express Image Editor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/online-photoshop-express-image-editor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/online-photoshop-express-image-editor/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:45:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/online-photoshop-express-image-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-114987</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 20:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/07/online-photoshop-express-image-editor/#comment-114987</guid>
		<description>That tool is not bad, but it doesn&#039;t include layers either. In my opinion layers are very much a necessity for editing photos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That tool is not bad, but it doesn&#8217;t include layers either. In my opinion layers are very much a necessity for editing photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/online-photoshop-express-image-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-114985</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 20:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/07/online-photoshop-express-image-editor/#comment-114985</guid>
		<description>This looks like a watered-down product -- too little, too late.

I prefer FotoFlexer http://fotoflexer.com/

In my opinion FotoFlexer is the best online image editor.  Many features, lots of fun tools and smooth integration with other sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks like a watered-down product &#8212; too little, too late.</p>
<p>I prefer FotoFlexer [<a href='http://fotoflexer.com/' rel='nofollow'>fotoflexer.com</a>]</p>
<p>In my opinion FotoFlexer is the best online image editor.  Many features, lots of fun tools and smooth integration with other sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
