<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online Version Of Microsoft Works?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/online-version-of-microsoft-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/online-version-of-microsoft-works/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:26:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ffextensionguru</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/online-version-of-microsoft-works/comment-page-1/#comment-24261</link>
		<dc:creator>ffextensionguru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 02:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/22/online-version-of-microsoft-works/#comment-24261</guid>
		<description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-24221&quot;&gt;Ryan wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I have always wondered why people would use Works over OpenOffice. I think that it is just a lack of publicity and maybe Google needs to team up with them like they did with Mozilla.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

Well, before OpenOffice it was a &#039;cheap&#039; alternative to MS Office, but now with broadband so widely available people can easily get OpenOffice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-24221">Ryan wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I have always wondered why people would use Works over OpenOffice. I think that it is just a lack of publicity and maybe Google needs to team up with them like they did with Mozilla.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Well, before OpenOffice it was a &#8216;cheap&#8217; alternative to MS Office, but now with broadband so widely available people can easily get OpenOffice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/online-version-of-microsoft-works/comment-page-1/#comment-24221</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/22/online-version-of-microsoft-works/#comment-24221</guid>
		<description>I have always wondered why people would use Works over OpenOffice. I think that it is just a lack of publicity and maybe Google needs to team up with them like they did with Mozilla.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always wondered why people would use Works over OpenOffice. I think that it is just a lack of publicity and maybe Google needs to team up with them like they did with Mozilla.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inferno_str1ke</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/online-version-of-microsoft-works/comment-page-1/#comment-24160</link>
		<dc:creator>Inferno_str1ke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/22/online-version-of-microsoft-works/#comment-24160</guid>
		<description>They stopped developing it because the large PC-dumb home and business market wouldn&#039;t buy it off them :P

I&#039;ve never seen the point of Works - it&#039;s like a crap version of Office to put on cheap new PCs or schools or stuff like that. If you want cheap, get Open Office, if you want an online one then go to Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They stopped developing it because the large PC-dumb home and business market wouldn&#8217;t buy it off them <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never seen the point of Works &#8211; it&#8217;s like a crap version of Office to put on cheap new PCs or schools or stuff like that. If you want cheap, get Open Office, if you want an online one then go to Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/online-version-of-microsoft-works/comment-page-1/#comment-23907</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 03:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/22/online-version-of-microsoft-works/#comment-23907</guid>
		<description>I know, I have always wondered why Microsoft stopped developing that because look at how popular Unix still is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know, I have always wondered why Microsoft stopped developing that because look at how popular Unix still is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ffextensionguru</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/online-version-of-microsoft-works/comment-page-1/#comment-23904</link>
		<dc:creator>ffextensionguru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 02:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/22/online-version-of-microsoft-works/#comment-23904</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;DOS? Isnâ€™t that the Denial-Of-Service operating system? ;)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hey now, it was/is a heck of a lot more stable than windoze.  :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>DOS? Isnâ€™t that the Denial-Of-Service operating system? <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p></blockquote>
<p>Hey now, it was/is a heck of a lot more stable than windoze.  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/online-version-of-microsoft-works/comment-page-1/#comment-23902</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 01:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/22/online-version-of-microsoft-works/#comment-23902</guid>
		<description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-23895&quot;&gt;ffextensionguru wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I used MS Works (ain&#039;t that an oxymoron?) a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away...Okay, make that early 90&#039;s back when it ran on...DOS! (okay for you people that are too young to know about DOS look it up on Wikipedia)!&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
DOS? Isn&#039;t that the Denial-Of-Service operating system? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-23895">ffextensionguru wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I used MS Works (ain&#8217;t that an oxymoron?) a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away&#8230;Okay, make that early 90&#8217;s back when it ran on&#8230;DOS! (okay for you people that are too young to know about DOS look it up on Wikipedia)!</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>DOS? Isn&#8217;t that the Denial-Of-Service operating system? <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ffextensionguru</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/online-version-of-microsoft-works/comment-page-1/#comment-23895</link>
		<dc:creator>ffextensionguru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 00:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/22/online-version-of-microsoft-works/#comment-23895</guid>
		<description>I used MS Works (ain&#039;t that an oxymoron?) a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away...Okay, make that early 90&#039;s back when it ran on...DOS! (okay for you people that are too young to know about DOS look it up on Wikipedia)!  It&#039;s time back then it was a nice program and not the space/resource hog that Office is.  HOWEVER, today&#039;s versions are worth it considering you can use OpenOffice which does everything Works does much better (mainly it is not Microsoft application).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used MS Works (ain&#8217;t that an oxymoron?) a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away&#8230;Okay, make that early 90&#8217;s back when it ran on&#8230;DOS! (okay for you people that are too young to know about DOS look it up on Wikipedia)!  It&#8217;s time back then it was a nice program and not the space/resource hog that Office is.  HOWEVER, today&#8217;s versions are worth it considering you can use OpenOffice which does everything Works does much better (mainly it is not Microsoft application).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/online-version-of-microsoft-works/comment-page-1/#comment-23883</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 20:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/22/online-version-of-microsoft-works/#comment-23883</guid>
		<description>I never actually tried Microsoft Works. The program that came with my laptop, and later my PC was Wordperfect. That program was truly bad. That&#039;s why I use OpenOffice.org now and MS Office 2007 (for now). 

I will definitely give this product a try if it does make it to the web. It would probably require an ActiveX control though so no Firefox user would be able to play with it. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never actually tried Microsoft Works. The program that came with my laptop, and later my PC was Wordperfect. That program was truly bad. That&#8217;s why I use OpenOffice.org now and MS Office 2007 (for now). </p>
<p>I will definitely give this product a try if it does make it to the web. It would probably require an ActiveX control though so no Firefox user would be able to play with it. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
