<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenOffice.org Redesigns Website, Launches Version 2.4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/openofficeorg-redesigns-website-launches-version-24/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/openofficeorg-redesigns-website-launches-version-24/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:26:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/openofficeorg-redesigns-website-launches-version-24/comment-page-1/#comment-134260</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/27/openofficeorg-redesigns-website-launches-version-24/#comment-134260</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-134169&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;leland wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;No it won’t bypass, that’s why I went to the trouble to find the version without JRE.  I made the mistake to download OO 2.3.1 with JRE and was constantly having to uninstall an old JRE after installing it due to the fact that it got reinstalled during the installation.  If they had a routine in the installer to detect it and bypass I would not care about the extra bandwidth because then one size really would fit all.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Huh, that&#039;s a bit disappointing then. That should be something that they look into. I can&#039;t imagine that it&#039;s too difficult to compare the version of Java installed with the one they are distributing. I&#039;ve seen other programs do it before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-134169" rel="nofollow">leland wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>No it won’t bypass, that’s why I went to the trouble to find the version without JRE.  I made the mistake to download OO 2.3.1 with JRE and was constantly having to uninstall an old JRE after installing it due to the fact that it got reinstalled during the installation.  If they had a routine in the installer to detect it and bypass I would not care about the extra bandwidth because then one size really would fit all.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Huh, that&#8217;s a bit disappointing then. That should be something that they look into. I can&#8217;t imagine that it&#8217;s too difficult to compare the version of Java installed with the one they are distributing. I&#8217;ve seen other programs do it before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leland</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/openofficeorg-redesigns-website-launches-version-24/comment-page-1/#comment-134169</link>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/27/openofficeorg-redesigns-website-launches-version-24/#comment-134169</guid>
		<description>No it won&#039;t bypass, that&#039;s why I went to the trouble to find the version without JRE.  I made the mistake to download OO 2.3.1 with JRE and was constantly having to uninstall an old JRE after installing it due to the fact that it got reinstalled during the installation.  If they had a routine in the installer to detect it and bypass I would not care about the extra bandwidth because then one size really would fit all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No it won&#8217;t bypass, that&#8217;s why I went to the trouble to find the version without JRE.  I made the mistake to download OO 2.3.1 with JRE and was constantly having to uninstall an old JRE after installing it due to the fact that it got reinstalled during the installation.  If they had a routine in the installer to detect it and bypass I would not care about the extra bandwidth because then one size really would fit all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/openofficeorg-redesigns-website-launches-version-24/comment-page-1/#comment-134095</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/27/openofficeorg-redesigns-website-launches-version-24/#comment-134095</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-133939&quot;&gt;leland wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I noticed the new interface when I went to download 2.4 yesterday.  It definitely looks nice, but they made it much harder to find the version without JRE to download.  I always have the latest JRE already installed and sometimes the version they include is older than the current version which can create issues.  My only hope would be they would rectify this situation so I don’t have to hunt through the mirrors to find what I want.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
That&#039;s definitely a good point, and the only reason they would probably do this is to prevent any confusion among their users who have no idea what Java is. I assume if you try to install the OpenOffice version that includes JRE it will just bypass the installation instead of reinstalling it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-133939">leland wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I noticed the new interface when I went to download 2.4 yesterday.  It definitely looks nice, but they made it much harder to find the version without JRE to download.  I always have the latest JRE already installed and sometimes the version they include is older than the current version which can create issues.  My only hope would be they would rectify this situation so I don’t have to hunt through the mirrors to find what I want.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>That&#8217;s definitely a good point, and the only reason they would probably do this is to prevent any confusion among their users who have no idea what Java is. I assume if you try to install the OpenOffice version that includes JRE it will just bypass the installation instead of reinstalling it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leland</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/openofficeorg-redesigns-website-launches-version-24/comment-page-1/#comment-133939</link>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/27/openofficeorg-redesigns-website-launches-version-24/#comment-133939</guid>
		<description>I noticed the new interface when I went to download 2.4 yesterday.  It definitely looks nice, but they made it much harder to find the version without JRE to download.  I always have the latest JRE already installed and sometimes the version they include is older than the current version which can create issues.  My only hope would be they would rectify this situation so I don&#039;t have to hunt through the mirrors to find what I want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed the new interface when I went to download 2.4 yesterday.  It definitely looks nice, but they made it much harder to find the version without JRE to download.  I always have the latest JRE already installed and sometimes the version they include is older than the current version which can create issues.  My only hope would be they would rectify this situation so I don&#8217;t have to hunt through the mirrors to find what I want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/openofficeorg-redesigns-website-launches-version-24/comment-page-1/#comment-133927</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/27/openofficeorg-redesigns-website-launches-version-24/#comment-133927</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-133884&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Michael Dobrofsky wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;How’s the interface for this new version? Spruced up yet? I wish OO was a bit more modern looking. You know, like…this decade. The last version I used look like it went with Win 3.1.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Nope, they even have OpenOffice.org 3.0 on the horizon (launching in September) and I don&#039;t think they have a new interface planned for that either. It would be nice to see it refreshed though.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-133917&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tinhed wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I am desperately waiting for ubuntu to update openoffice. I ve checked the screenshots and there does not seem to be any drastic changes in the UI, still very reminiscent of Office XP, but i bet there will be a lot of improvements under  the hood.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
There are quite a few improvements going on underneath it all. I wonder how long it will take Ubuntu to update it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-133884" rel="nofollow">Michael Dobrofsky wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>How’s the interface for this new version? Spruced up yet? I wish OO was a bit more modern looking. You know, like…this decade. The last version I used look like it went with Win 3.1.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Nope, they even have OpenOffice.org 3.0 on the horizon (launching in September) and I don&#8217;t think they have a new interface planned for that either. It would be nice to see it refreshed though.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-133917" rel="nofollow">Tinhed wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I am desperately waiting for ubuntu to update openoffice. I ve checked the screenshots and there does not seem to be any drastic changes in the UI, still very reminiscent of Office XP, but i bet there will be a lot of improvements under  the hood.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>There are quite a few improvements going on underneath it all. I wonder how long it will take Ubuntu to update it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tinhed</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/openofficeorg-redesigns-website-launches-version-24/comment-page-1/#comment-133917</link>
		<dc:creator>Tinhed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/27/openofficeorg-redesigns-website-launches-version-24/#comment-133917</guid>
		<description>I am desperately waiting for ubuntu to update openoffice. I ve checked the screenshots and there does not seem to be any drastic changes in the UI, still very reminiscent of Office XP, but i bet there will be a lot of improvements under  the hood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am desperately waiting for ubuntu to update openoffice. I ve checked the screenshots and there does not seem to be any drastic changes in the UI, still very reminiscent of Office XP, but i bet there will be a lot of improvements under  the hood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/openofficeorg-redesigns-website-launches-version-24/comment-page-1/#comment-133915</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/27/openofficeorg-redesigns-website-launches-version-24/#comment-133915</guid>
		<description>2.4 seems to be a solid improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2.4 seems to be a solid improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar Upegui</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/openofficeorg-redesigns-website-launches-version-24/comment-page-1/#comment-133907</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar Upegui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/27/openofficeorg-redesigns-website-launches-version-24/#comment-133907</guid>
		<description>Ryan:

Absolutely!  This is what I call a A+ website design.  The soft colors used are a treat to the eyes.

Good Day!

Omar.-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan:</p>
<p>Absolutely!  This is what I call a A+ website design.  The soft colors used are a treat to the eyes.</p>
<p>Good Day!</p>
<p>Omar.-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pieter</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/openofficeorg-redesigns-website-launches-version-24/comment-page-1/#comment-133901</link>
		<dc:creator>Pieter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/27/openofficeorg-redesigns-website-launches-version-24/#comment-133901</guid>
		<description>Wow... their site definitely looks nice!

Update: the guy who made the new design is apparently Dutch or Belgian... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; their site definitely looks nice!</p>
<p>Update: the guy who made the new design is apparently Dutch or Belgian&#8230; <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pieter</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/openofficeorg-redesigns-website-launches-version-24/comment-page-1/#comment-133900</link>
		<dc:creator>Pieter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/27/openofficeorg-redesigns-website-launches-version-24/#comment-133900</guid>
		<description>Wow... their site definitely looks nice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; their site definitely looks nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
